Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plame Case: Fitzgerald is Getting Nifonged - Mother Jones

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 09:55 PM
Original message
Plame Case: Fitzgerald is Getting Nifonged - Mother Jones
Washington Dispatch: As the Scooter Libby trial begins in D.C., conservatives in the media are trying to undercut the credibility of the prosecution's case by comparing Patrick Fitzgerald to embattled Duke case prosecutor Mike Nifong.

By Daniel Schulman

January 17, 2007

What do Patrick Fitzgerald and Mike Nifong share in common? Not much, beyond the fact that both are prosecutors who have pursued politically fraught cases. But don't tell that to Investor's Business Daily, which published an editorial today calling for "all the rogue prosecutors" to be reigned in. The paper's prime examples of prosecutorial zealotry are Nifong, who recused himself last week from the Duke sexual assault case, and Fitzgerald, whose perjury and obstruction of justice case against Lewis "Scooter" Libby began in D.C. district court on Tuesday. "Like the Duke lacrosse players, Scooter Libby faces jail for alleged involvement in a crime that was never committed, pursued by a vindictive prosecutor," the editorial reasons. "And also like the Duke case, it's a national disgrace."

In lumping Fitzgerald with Nifong, whose case against the Duke lacrosse players appears at best deeply flawed and potentially politically motivated, Investor's Business Daily is only the latest to deploy this disingenuous bait and switch. Making a similar argument in an op-ed last summer, columnist Jack Kelly cast the Plame and Duke cases as part of the same cautionary tale. "This should remind us the greater threat to our civil liberties comes not from the measures the Bush administration has taken to protect us from terrorists, but from prosecutors who abuse their power for political purposes." More recently the columnist posed this question to his readers: "Is to 'fitzgerald' a synonym for to 'nifong?'"

http://www.motherjones.com/washington_dispatch/2007/01/nifong_fitzgerald.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, they must be so hopeful.
Like Fitzgerald gives a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fitzgeralds reputation speaks for itself. Won't stick.
Nor do I think he really cares what the wingers say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. it'll only make him dig his heals in a bit more. methinks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. No problem here! Fitz has had lots of stuff said about him before,
and I'm sure will in future cases too! I suspect he'd tell you it comes with the territory. Fitz can take care of himself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. what a moronic argument
They aren't even remotely alike, and Nifong is 1/100th of the Prosecutor that Fitzgerald is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. So, let's see...
Edited on Fri Jan-19-07 10:07 PM by jayctravis
"...Scooter Libby faces jail for alleged involvement in a crime that was never committed, pursued by a vindictive prosecutor,"

With Clinton, what they finally nailed him on was a charge that would not have occurred had he not been prosecuted by a vindictive prosecutor. Ken Starr started on Clinton for one thing and ended up going around the world and back again after something completely different, and finally only got him on the ground that he "lied" during the questioning.

Hey, does this mean we can impeach Libby somehow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. I smell desperation.
How dare they compare Fitzgerald to Nifong? Nifong and Starr maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. I still believe the original case is still alive
Edited on Fri Jan-19-07 10:08 PM by jaysunb
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, let's see...maybe I'LL liken Fitz to Vince Bugliosi! That whole
"put them all away" kind of success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. How about this scenario --
Scooter is Super Jesus, and Fitz is Gay Hitler.

That should work just as well.

--p!
You don't fuck with The Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fitzgerald isn't Ken Starr no matter how the rw tries to make that so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. See for Fitz to be Nifonged, he'd have to prosecute someone for political reasons...
totally unrelated to the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. Investor's Business Daily is your typical right wing rag
Here's more of their claptrap:


http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=241744137262638

Did Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald Lie?
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

Posted 8/29/2006

Plamegate: Patrick Fitzgerald's three-year manhunt to track down who blew Valerie Plame's CIA "cover" has been exposed as a costly sham. He apparently knew all along that his man was not Scooter Libby.

When Fitzgerald, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, was assigned the Plame case, he was hailed as a paragon of integrity. He'd helped convict Mafia boss John Gotti, the 1993 World Trade Center bombers and former Illinois Republican Gov. George Ryan, who'll be sentenced next month on 22 counts of bribery and racketeering.

But it's hard to see anything but politics as the motivation for Fitzgerald's handling of the Plame affair. The facts indicate that Fitzgerald knew early on that the original leaker was State Department official Richard Armitage. So why did Fitzgerald let a cloud hang over White House adviser Karl Rove's head for so long? And why is Fitzgerald continuing to hound Libby, the former vice presidential chief of staff?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC