Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gonzales Blames Legal Challenges For Five Year Delay In Bringing Gitmo Detainees To Trial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:54 AM
Original message
Gonzales Blames Legal Challenges For Five Year Delay In Bringing Gitmo Detainees To Trial
Darn that pesky Bill of Rights :grr:

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/16/gonzales-gitmo/

The track record of the Guantanamo detention program “can be summed up quite simply: five years, zero convictions.” More than 770 captives have been held there and just 10 have been charged with crimes.

But in an interview today with the Associated Press, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales “blamed delays in trying terror detainees at Guantanamo Bay on legal challenges filed by their lawyers“:

“It’s not for lack of trying,” Gonzales said, when asked about the legal fate of detainees who have been held at the military facility, in some cases for five years. “We are challenged every step of the way.”

“We are trying as hard as we can to bring these individuals to justice,” he said.

The administration has been challenged because they have been operating under a shadow system of justice. During past hearings, the government “called no witnesses, withheld evidence from detainees and usually reached a decision within a day as it determined that hundreds of men…were ‘enemy combatants.’” The Supreme Court rejected these tribunals because they “were neither authorized by federal law nor required by military necessity, and ran afoul of the Geneva Conventions.”

If President Bush had simply followed the law, these trials could have happened years ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. They would have happened, yes - but they would have been *fair* and *legal* trials
not the kangaroo-court trials ending in sentences of execution on a "we assume you are guilty since you are here" basis.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's true.. he would have hung them all years ago. . . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Then they would have been hanged.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. So he's pretending the lawyers stopped him from charging the detainees
with a crime?!? Not likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder35 Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Look where Bush is from
What he has done to people in texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Welcome to DU
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. So it's all the fault of those individuals who insist on holding the
government responsible for obeying the law. What kind of twisted logic is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's complete BS
The "not for a lack of trying" is just sad. They are pleading effort now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. If bush* and gonzooles had their way, they hang till their heads popped off.
No trial, none of that legal mumbo jumbo from the courts.

Sadistic bastards. Watch how bush* clings to the law and the scores of lawyers he'll have to bring to court should he ever have to bear responsibility for his killing fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC