Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When w campaigned, did anyone ask if he was qualified to be president?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:30 AM
Original message
When w campaigned, did anyone ask if he was qualified to be president?
Like they are now asking about Hillary and Obama? That's the question today on cspan.

If I remember my ancient history, his so called political experience was being the governor of Texas, and the word was that he was merely a statue governor, and he once owned a baseball team and sold it for a monstrous profit, and he had once run an oil company that couldn't find oil in Texas and went bankrupt, while he made humongous profits, and oh yeah, he did tons of cocaine and drank rivers of Jack Daniels.

And he was a shitty student and he went AWOL from the TANG.

If bush can be president, a fucking dead armadillo can be too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. an armadillo would have done less damage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. The first test for any want-to-be Prez.
You gotta be able to say the word "nuclear" correctly. If you can't do that, then you shouldn't be running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes - but the media always raised then quickly dismissed both
the experience - and the "gravitas" issues - telling the public that those things really weren't important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. They said it didn't matter that Bush was dumb.
Because he had a "dream team" of experienced hands - you know, guys like Cheney and Rumsfeld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shadrach Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. I remember someone gave him a quiz on the spot
asking him about names of world leaders and he did really poorly and that was news for a couple of days. It was obvious that he was an idiot and he lost the election. The supreme court decided that election. Not the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Welcome Shadrach, nice to have you aboard
The story you refer to was that someone had the audacity to ask a man who wanted to be president questions he should have known the answer to. Obviously the questioner was an evil liberal plant trying to confuse the christian and ever wonderful george bush, patron saint of pretty fucking worthless shitty politicians (all of whom are republican.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. You are 100% correct
Welcome to DU,Shadrach

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/11/05/bush.popquiz/

Bush fails reporter's pop quiz on international leaders
November 5, 1999

Web posted at: 3:29 p.m. EST (2029 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Texas Gov. George W. Bush is enduring sharp criticism for being unable to name the leaders of four current world hot spots, but President Bill Clinton says Bush "should, and probably will, pick up" those names.

The front-runner for the 2000 Republican presidential nomination faltered Thursday in an international affairs pop quiz posed by Andy Hiller, a political reporter for WHDH-TV in Boston.
Hiller asked Bush to name the leaders of Chechnya, Taiwan, India and Pakistan. Bush was only able to give a partial response to the query on the leader of Taiwan, referring to Taiwanese President Lee Teng-hui simply as "Lee." He could not name the others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. He also did his father's dirty work I read.
I think we need to put in a 'type' not how long he has been in any office. Bush's history in every thing shows he was not a man of good values and never a man with an open mind. That is not a man to put in as a President of this country. Obama seems to have a open mind to all problems and is of course smart enough to be able to think in an open way and see many sides. I do not know but do not think he thinks he is always right. Bush seems to think he is right about every thing and I am sure believes in divine rule which really is a scary thing to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Experience Was A Bad Thing In 2000
The corporate media told us so!

They kept building up boooshie as a "fresh new face"...a new generation...an outsider, blah blah blah. Experience? That was a bad thing. Like the time the reporter asked him to name leaders of foreign countries and boooshie couldn't do it...one of those he was asked about was Musharaf! The media thought the asking him this question was over the line...the first of many, many passes this boy has had. On the otherhand Gore couldn't get a break. The most experienced man we've had running for President in our lifetimes was pummeled for his wardrobe, if he was an "alfa-male", if he had invented the internet and so on.

The corporate game is to build 'em up and knock 'em down. Now we're seeing some of that finally going boooshie's way, since he's lost a lot of his political popularity...and be assured they'll be going after any and all Democrats. They've already done a number on Hillary and have used Obama to be the anti-Hillary...if there's no Hillary around, then he gets all their scorn.

As we've been told over and over again here, the corporate media is not our friend. Count on them to spin things in a Repugnican light as that's where their interests truly lie. Look at the pass St. McCain has been getting on his extreme positions and support of very unpopular positions...yet he's still there darling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Ever since the Fairness Doctrine was ignored by Raygun
we have had the corporate elite shoving their opinion down our throats. Most people just open wide and swallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Nobody asked anything.
He's a Bush. That's what qualifies him. And half of this cargo van full of idiots fell for it.

It's amazing that the same Americans calling for the end of England's royals have no problem genuflecting face down to our own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. His daddy was president 41, the total fuckup, it'll be great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. The media hyped that he was the first MBA President(hopeful)
obviously ignoring the fact that he never had anything to do with a business venture that made a profit ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. The money "qualified" him, remember? That's all they talked about.
"he had the money to win"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. & unfortunately it IS the number one qualifier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
16. He was the man that most voters wanted to sit down and...
have a beer with. That was his qualifier. Plus, his daddy's friends paid good money to get him there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yep. "Entertaining Drunkard" is now a qualification for high office.
John Tower would be proud. (hic!) :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. We didn't have to
The M$M told us he was immensely qualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, and the US "media" felt that Cheney the Dick would be the guiding hand,
the responsible grown-up, who would gently teach & guide bush.

Of course that's the same US "media" who helped the bush regime lie 72% of Americans into believing Iraq did 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R for one of those eternal questions n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. No one asked. And they should have. And that's my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Nobody seriously asked and he was a failure at everything he did prior
to being Governor of TX, which is a constitutionally weak Governor's office. The Lt. Gov. has more power on budgetary matters for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC