Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There are 40,000 Police to keep the peace in NYC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:30 AM
Original message
There are 40,000 Police to keep the peace in NYC
We are trying to keep the peace in SEVERAL CITIES IN A LARGE COUNTRY with less than FOUR TIMES that.

If Bush really wants to secure the peace in Iraq, he needs to FOLLOW GENERAL SHINSHEKI'S ORIGINAL PLAN, which was to use 500,000 troops IN COOPERATION WITH THE IRAQI ARMY after the war to secure Iraq.

You can't do it with a force with a size of just FOUR NYC POLICE DEPARTMENTS.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. And the citizenry isn't openly attacking the NYPD
Hopeless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Shinsheki was part of the old school of US military. He believed
that if you invaded a country you had better be prepared to subdue the population with overwhelming force. Unfortunately this invasion was "planned" by a few intellectuals who mostly got in charge because of cronyism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Calling these criminals "intellectuals" is giving them way too much credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. At best , people like Wolfowitz & Perle were considered intellectuals
without any exposure to the military, at the time. Those two, along with Rumsfeld apparently called the all the shots. A war crimes trial is probably needed to sort these guys out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rumsfeld told Franks 'smaller'
The operations part of this nightmare lies squarely on the shoulders of those two. It's all in Woodward's book that came out a few years ago. They needed a small force so they could sneak them into Kuwait while telling the American people they weren't planning war, they just needed American unity in front of the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think it's too late for Shinseki's plan
this whole thing is probably the greatest fuckup in the history of American foreign policy. There is simply no good solution. We are all collectively to blame for letting this idiot start something we knew he couldn't finish and I especially blame the Dems who voted for the original Iraq resolution. Shit, even a dummy like me knew it was all bullshit. WTF is wrong with our supposedly wise and informed legislators?

Let's review our alternatives:

1. Stay the course - even * admits it's a failed strategy.
2. Leave now - fucked Iraq for all time. $10 per gallon gas after Iran takes control.
3. "Surge" - see "Stay the course". Same shit, differrent name.
4. Shinseki plan - even 500,000 not enough now. Besides where would they come from?
5. Bomb Iran - World War III.

The only thing common to all these alternatives is the total loss of respect for America among the global community. And the end of the myth of American omnipotence.

Good job, asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobendorfer Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. By way of comparison
When Germany surrendered in May 1945, the United States had forty-three -- yes, forty-three! -- divisions of troops in Germany. The British had fifteen divisions there. That's a total of fifty-eight divisions to occupy a hostile power ... and that doesn't even count what the Soviets brought to the party, which was probably larger than the combined Anglo-American force.

So here's Bush, trying to occupy a Iraq with a force that is roughly 1/15th of what the Allies deployed to defeat and (at least initially) occupy Germany.

And we're surprised it doesn't work?

J.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Great way to illumine the problem; source:
Authority always helps; found this at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_Police_Department :

"NYPD members are frequently referred to by the nickname New York's Finest. The NYPD is headquartered at One Police Plaza, located on Park Row across the street from City Hall.
The size of the force has fluctuated, depending on crime rates, politics, and available funding. The overall trend, however, shows that the number of sworn officers is decreasing. In June 2004, there were about 40,000 sworn officers plus several thousand support staff; In June 2005, that number dropped to 35,000. The NYPD's current authorized uniformed strength is 37,038, which is scheduled to increase to 37,838 in January 2007 (<1>)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-11-07 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. i think what is coming is an open campaign of brutality
that will of course be blamed on the iraqis themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC