Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting article in NY times about Saddam's last hours

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
RedTail Wolf Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 03:38 AM
Original message
Interesting article in NY times about Saddam's last hours
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/07/world/middleeast/07ticktock.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5094&en=b0246e2cd77524e9&hp&ex=1168232400&partner=homepage The two country's can't agree on anything...What a helluva mess the Chimp has gotten us into

RedTail Wolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. How very sad for our country
This administration does NOT represent the will, the thoughts, and the morals of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kindof ironic is this paragraph.

"“We said, ‘You have to do it by international law, you have to do it in accordance with international standards of decorum, you have to establish yourselves as a nation under law,’ ” an American official recounted. When Mr. Maliki said the Americans should respect Iraq’s right to decide matters for itself, American officials said, one of the Americans said: “Forget about us. You’re in front of the international community here. People will be watching this.”"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pettypace Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That message is tragic
In that it applies ironically to the invasion itself, and the negative light it has shown on the US/Bush.

I mean, what the hell, the US Military commanders were upset in handing over Saddam, when HE was the reason this whole sorry afair was undertaken for! It boggles the mind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. "Forget about us."
IOW, those "international standards of decorum" the American official referred to aren't the ones set by the US on how to treat detainees.

What a shame Maliki didn't listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. You know, just like we do.
We said, ‘You have to do it by international law, you have to do it in accordance with international standards of decorum, you have to establish yourselves as a nation under law,’ ” an American official recounted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. You have to do it by international law
Edited on Sun Jan-07-07 07:19 AM by malaise
Someone should have told that to Bush when he led to the world and invaded Iraq. Chirac knew that.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/05/news/france.php

add link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. less concern for justice than revenge
"Aides said American commanders were deeply upset by the way they were forced to hand Mr. Hussein over, a sequence commanders saw as motivated less by a concern for justice than for revenge."

That's the real truth of this hanging. When you take away all the rationalizations and decorum, the death penalty is just uncivilized ugly business. It's no different here than there. That was a clue as to what we were electing in Bush too. I just don't think you can preside over the taking of 100 human lives and not have it fuck up your head, unless you're head was fucked up to start with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-07-07 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Revenge is the reason we're in Iraq at this very moment.
"He tried to kill my Daddy". Bush had it out for Saddam from the very beginning. He wanted revenge. Add to that the fact that Saddam, their own creation, had cut the strings from his puppet masters and struck out on his own, well......our government doesn't take kindly to people that wander off the course dictated by them. We created this monster and we had no more use for him, he'd outlived his intended purpose and became a thorn in America's side. And, as usual, they had to take him out. This type of American "diplomacy" has been repeated many times in the course of history.

Our government is so full of hypocrisy it boggles the mind. "They hate us for our freedoms". :rofl: No, Mr. Bush, they hate us because we're the most meddlesome, hypocritical, selfish and dishonest country on the planet. Our "freedoms" (disappearing at a pace even faster than the Antarctic ice-shelf) have nothing to do with it. We use and discard people and countries at an alarming pace and it does not go unnoticed by others in the world. THAT, Mr. Bush, is the reason they hate us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC