Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

don't you hate when things make sense?........

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 09:34 PM
Original message
don't you hate when things make sense?........
Edited on Sat Jan-06-07 10:05 PM by stillcool47
Max Fuller
"For Iraq, the 'Salvador Option’ becomes Reality
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/FUL506A.html
"In Iraq the war comes in two phases. The first phase is complete: the destruction of the existing state, which did not comply with the interests of British and American capital. The second phase consists of building a new state tied to those interests and smashing every dissenting sector of society. Openly, this involves applying the same sort of economic shock therapy that has done so much damage in swathes of the Third World and Eastern Europe. Covertly, it means intimidating, kidnapping and murdering opposition voices................
What we do know, however, is that hundreds of Iraqis are being murdered and that paramilitary hit squads of the proxy government organized by US trainers with a fulsome pedigree in state terrorism are increasingly being associated with them." The objective of the death squads is not simply to target one particular group or ethnicity, but to direct the violence outwards creating as much fear as possible in order to pacify the population.

Crying Wolf: Media Disinformation and Death Squads in Occupied Iraq
By Max Fuller
November 10, 2006
The phenomenon of death squads operating in Iraq has become generally accepted over recent
months. However, in its treatment of the issue, the mainstream media has zealously followed
a line of attributing extrajudicial killings to unaccountable Shia militias who have risen to prominence with the electoral victory of Ibramhim Jafaari’s Shia-led government in January. The following article examines both the way in which the information has been widely presented and whether that presentation has any actual basis in fact. Concluding that the attribution to Shia militias is unsustainable, the article considers who the intellectual authors of these crimes against humanity are and what purpose they serve in the context of the ongoing occupation of the country.
............................................
False Flags, Semiotics and Vulgar Marxists
The French theorist Jean Baudrillard famously once stated that the first Gulf War did not take place. By this he did not mean that nothing happened, but that its presentation in the media consisted of an overwhelming barrage of the signs of War, which bore essentially no relationship to the annihilation of a Third World army by the most advanced military power
in history. In short it was a simulation of war. This was perhaps the most extreme example
of what Baudrilliard referred to as the ‘ecstacy of communication’, that in our Information
Age, concepts spin at such a rate that their outlines become lost and their original
meanings are replaced with empty alternative.
............................
Whether such tactics succeed in provoking further, autonomous acts of violence directed against the civilian population is much less significant than the impact they are able to
exert within the media.
This Anglo-American intelligence operation acts as a factory
churning out the signs of Civil War: a ‘wave of tit-for-tat sectarian violence’ and the
consequent ethnic cleansing. The signs are produced to be picked up by the media and spun
and spun until nothing is left but a nebulous Civil War with no internal logic or structure,
with the occupying forces as powerless to intervene as they were in the Balkans while Iraq
splits into Rubiae’s desired four to six autonomous provinces. Those few journalists, like
Yasser Salihee and Steven Vincent, who break the mould and start to investigate the actual
authorship of extrajudicial killings themselves become victims.

.......................................................................
To penetrate the media smokescreen of spontaneous, uncontrollable violence and understand
the role of intelligence operations in the creation of a beholden, occupied client state or
series of statelets is fundamental to understanding the processes in Iraq today. It is also
fundamental to recognising that the presence of Anglo-American forces in Iraq does not merely exacerbate the present violence; in Iraq we are the violence.
Max Fuller is the author of ‘For Iraq, the Salvador Option Become Reality’ published by the
Centre for Research on Globalisation. He can be contacted at Max.Fuller@talktalk.net.


Uncovering the Roots of American Terrorism in Iraq
Mike Whitney
December 2, 2005
The immense media disinformation campaign is designed to shift blame away from its American
roots and promote the idea of massive sectarian unrest. This feeds the notion of an incipient civil war, which in turn achieves the American policy objective of Balkanizing the country to control its resources. The one reporter who diverged from these fabrications was Yasser Salihee, reporter for Knight-Ridder news. Salihee had uncovered critical information about the weaponry, vehicles and origins of the death squads, and was expected to file reports on those topics. His coverage, however, was cut short when he was assassinated in a gangland style hit at a checkpoint outside Baghdad by an American sniper. With just one precision shot to the forehead, another unembedded journalist was removed from covering
Bush’s folly.
...............................................................
Fuller’s research exposes the Interior Ministry as the hub of the clandestine death squad activity. The assumption that the ministry is manned exclusively by theocratic Shiites is just more misleading media gibberish. In fact, one of the more brutal counterinsurgency groups, the Sunni-led Special Police Commandos, is headed by a former officer in Saddam’s Baath Party. (The Commandos were founded by the son of the former Iraqi Chief of Staff Falah al-Naqib, who many believed to be a CIA asset.) The connections of Interior Ministry chieftains to their CIA managers are deep and confusing but, as Fuller notes, "the Police Commandos were formed under the experienced tutelage and oversight of veteran US counterinsurgency fighters, and from the outset conducted joint-force operations with elite and highly secretive US special-forces units." (Reuters, National Review Online)


Death Squad Democracy
Mike Whitney
March 19, 2006
The notion that Iraq is now consumed by civil war depends on a number of assumptions that
are inherently false. First of all, it assumes that the Pentagon is ignoring the fundamental
principle which underscores all wars: "Know your enemy". In this case, there’s no doubt
about who the enemy is; it is the 87% of the Iraqi people who want to see an immediate end
to the American occupation. Therefore, the greatest threat to American objectives of permanent bases and occupation is the camaraderie that that manifests itself in the form of Arab solidarity or Iraqi nationalism. To this end, the Pentagon, through its surrogates in the media, has created a "self-fulfilling" narrative that civil war is already under way. Most of the war coverage now makes it appear as though the violence is generated from ethnic tensions and sectarian hatred. But is it? Some of the more astute observers have noticed that other parts of the propaganda war, (like references to the "imaginary" al-Zarqawi) have vanished from the newspapers, as government spin-doctors are now devoting all their time to promoting their latest product-line; civil war.
.........................................................
In a larger sense, the "alleged" sectarian violence is consistent with what we have seen in
previous CIA-run operations in El Salvador and Nicaragua. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Negroponte
are alumna of those conflicts (which, according to Cheney, succeeded quite admirably) so it’s probable that they would apply what they have learned about counterinsurgency to the ongoing war in Iraq. The El Salvador-experiment proved that the masses can eventually be terrorized into compliance
.....................................
Death Squad Democracy Video footage of a massacre outside of Nahrwan, east of Baghdad, has appeared on the Internet showing the bodies of Shiite laborers who were allegedly killed by Sunni death squads. Journalist Paul McGeough was given the tapes and is planning to report on their content in the "Sydney Morning Herald". http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12376.htm
In one incident, four adults were pulled from their vehicle and either shot or stabbed to death in front of a 5 year old boy whose father was one of the victims. When the townspeople came to investigate the scene, they discovered the bodies of 48 men and women who had been dumped in a ditch. The corpses showed the signs of having been "systematically murdered. Most were shot but some appear to have been stabbed and mutilated". It is the "stabbed and mutilated" part that should interest us. After all, the intention of the Iraqi resistance is to gather greater support for their cause, not to alienate ordinary Iraqis through gratuitous acts of murder. If, however, this was the work of American-backed death squads, then the alternate goal of "governing through terror" has been achieved.....................
www.uruknet.info?p=21713

What is Covert Action?
J.V. Grady, ICH
September 21, 2005
There are many types of Covert Action operations, not all of them violent. For example, if a government wishes to influence the politics of another country’s government, the government may secretly fund an opposition party in that country in order to influence that country’s elections. Another method is to employ foreign newspaper reporters to write articles that give the version of events, the propaganda, that you want people to believe, even if it is the furthest thing from the truth. Or perhaps the owners or editors of a newspaper or media service can be bought or won over to allow articles or news stories created by the Intelligence organization for propaganda purposes to be planted in the newspaper or media service. A slant can then be given to influence public perceptions. For example, mercenaries can be referred to as “contractors”, thus making people believe that casualties among the mercenaries are innocent civilian construction workers who were unjustly victimized.

The main thing about Covert Action is that it must be deniable. There is a term called “plausible deniability”. When a government authorizes a covert action operation, the operation must be done in such a way that the government can claim that it knows nothing about it; in other words, the operation must not be attributable to the government that authorized it.

Covert Action operations are often Disinformation Operations, which are conducted in such a way as to discredit the opposition or the enemy. This is done, for example, by doing a violent action, such as a bombing, but making it look like the forces of another country or group did it. Such operations are sometimes called False-Flag Operations, meaning that the operation is conducted to make it look like it was done by people serving under another flag, preferably the enemy’s flag. If the operation succeeds as designed, people will blame the action on the wrong party (the enemy). Thus, public opinion will be won over to the side that actually did the killing. Such false-flag, covert action operations are often referred to as Dirty Tricks.

The British regularly employed Covert Action operations in Ireland, with the result that it is likely that the IRA often took the blame for violent actions with which they had no involvement, although they were hardly innocent players in the general mayhem. Many people suspect that the Northern Irish bank robbery that occurred some time back was actually a British Covert Action operation designed to make the IRA take the blame, so that people would believe that the IRA was not honouring the Good Friday Agreement. Incidentally, most of the British Northern Irish bank notes taken were worthless old notes, so they were no skin off anyone’s teeth.
................................................................................
So, who is behind many of the bombings against the Shi’ia and Sunni populations? It is quite possible, even probable, that many of them are being carried out by American, British, and even Israeli Covert Action operatives. So, when you watch the news, think more deeply about what you’re seeing; and when you read your newspapers, try reading between the lines or wonder about the source or the writer behind the article. Has the article been planted? Is the writer in the pay of an intelligence service?
J.V. Grady is a former member of US Military Intelligence
informationclearinghouse.info/article10356.htm

The BRussells Tribunal:http://www.brusselstribunal.org/
Questioning the New Imperial World Order












Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll recommend this for broader discussion. There are too many
unanswered questions that these articles touch on to just dismiss them, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Baudrilliard is overrated.
I understand his argument, but it is unnacceptable to me because it rejects the idea of any facticity in communication, and as such a notion that there can be a truthful interpretation of complex chains of events. My belief is that there must be a truth that can be learned, otherwise we would have all perished already, and there would be no society and no Baudrilliard. So yes, mass media is parasitic, but it does have its uses. His position prejudges the nature of events in such a way that rather then demonstrating his understanding, he reveals that he does not care one bit about understanding, and is much more concerned with the rhetoric than the substance. To judge is to open the possibility of further judgements for better or worse. People are dying...

There is a reason people still write books and thus circumvent the media of television: case in point "Jarhead" by Anthony Swofford, or in the case of the new war "The Last True Story I'll Ever Tell" by John Crawford. I look forward to the emergence of Iraqi literature on these atrocities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. wow...I must have screwed up...
that was the last thing I wanted to emphasize in this post. Do you read further, or give it up when you saw the name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No, just having some fun with theory...
I'm just not a fan of semiotics, sorry, but you did bold it.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. ..that I did...
semiotics...who knew? Not I. I was going for the 1+1=2 type of deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Kant, huh?
OK. But, many are over-rated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yes. In particular,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique_of_Judgement

Although, I do have a few differences.

Many are over-rated, but that doesn't mean they aren't significant.

Also, I thoroughly believe that the United States have a willing hand in some of the death squads in Iraq and that the functional purpose of these groups is described spot on in:"The objective of the death squads is not simply to target one particular group or ethnicity, but to direct the violence outwards creating as much fear as possible in order to pacify the population." To generate a position of power...However that is not to deny that there is also a stong aspect of identity politics in what goes on, there are dual purposes at work.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone who has ever studied the US involvement in Latin America
or even read Noam Chomsky should not hear about the death squads or the insurgents activity and not suspect the US to have a hand in it. Even in the sixties under Johnson, the School of the Americans was turning out death squads that were employed in places like Dominican Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It is sublimely depressing, especially so this evening.
Makes me wonder just how complacent our fellow citizens are about death squads, torture, economic slavery, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. if no one talks about the 'problem'..
how can there be a solution? I did read one article today...forget who...that included solutions...which were basically to un-legislate all the laws that keep the top 2% as major owners of we and ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. I would love for Helen Thomas to ask Tony Snow about this...
‘The Salvador Option’
The Pentagon may put Special-Forces-led assassination or kidnapping teams in Iraq


AP
Nuns pray over the bodies of four American sisters killed by the military in El Salvador in 1980

WEB EXCLUSIVE
By Michael Hirsh and John Barry
Newsweek
Updated: 5:59 p.m. PT Jan 14, 2005

Jan. 8 - What to do about the deepening quagmire of Iraq? The Pentagon’s latest approach is being called "the Salvador option"—and the fact that it is being discussed at all is a measure of just how worried Donald Rumsfeld really is. "What everyone agrees is that we can’t just go on as we are," one senior military officer told NEWSWEEK. "We have to find a way to take the offensive against the insurgents. Right now, we are playing defense. And we are losing." Last November’s operation in Fallujah, most analysts agree, succeeded less in breaking "the back" of the insurgency—as Marine Gen. John Sattler optimistically declared at the time—than in spreading it out.

Now, NEWSWEEK has learned, the Pentagon is intensively debating an option that dates back to a still-secret strategy in the Reagan administration’s battle against the leftist guerrilla insurgency in El Salvador in the early 1980s. Then, faced with a losing war against Salvadoran rebels, the U.S. government funded or supported "nationalist" forces that allegedly included so-called death squads directed to hunt down and kill rebel leaders and sympathizers. Eventually the insurgency was quelled, and many U.S. conservatives consider the policy to have been a success—despite the deaths of innocent civilians and the subsequent Iran-Contra arms-for-hostages scandal. (Among the current administration officials who dealt with Central America back then is John Negroponte, who is today the U.S. ambassador to Iraq. Under Reagan, he was ambassador to Honduras. There is no evidence, however, that Negroponte knew anything about the Salvadoran death squads or the Iran-Contra scandal at the time. The Iraq ambassador, in a phone call to NEWSWEEK on Jan. 10, said he was not involved in military strategy in Iraq. He called the insertion of his name into this report "utterly gratuitous.")

Following that model, one Pentagon proposal would send Special Forces teams to advise, support and possibly train Iraqi squads, most likely hand-picked Kurdish Peshmerga fighters and Shiite militiamen, to target Sunni insurgents and their sympathizers, even across the border into Syria, according to military insiders familiar with the discussions. It remains unclear, however, whether this would be a policy of assassination or so-called "snatch" operations, in which the targets are sent to secret facilities for interrogation. The current thinking is that while U.S. Special Forces would lead operations in, say, Syria, activities inside Iraq itself would be carried out by Iraqi paramilitaries, officials tell NEWSWEEK.

~more @ link~
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6802629/site/newsweek



I strongly recommend reading the entire article.


k&r for an excellent post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. it sickens
just sickens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Recommended for wider viewing
This cabal has ignored advice from our military and diplomatic experts for six years now and again with this salvador option as its called (as though time and place has stood still) don't seem to realize Iraq is not Central America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Here's some ideas for solutions..
Hysteria Over Iran and a New Cold War with Russia: Peak Oil, Petrocurrencies and the Emerging Multi-Polar World
Review Article (pdf)

by William Clark

Global Research, January 6, 2007
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20070106&articleId=4357

http://globalresearch.ca/articles/williamclarkrussia.pdf

To save the American experiment and stop our slide toward an authoritarian state, we must create a divided government following the 2006 mid-term elections and elect an enlightened president in 2008. Nothing less than revolutionary changes are needed of the political landscape, including a federal mandate requiring voter-verified, auditable paper records of balloting in our elections. Information Security experts are unanimous in their analysis that the unauditable “e-voting” machines used in the US are easily compromised and represent a profound risk to our democracy. <153>
Regrettably, the two major parties have become different factions representing the same richest two percent of the population, and both espouse an imperial agenda. Their prime constituency is the elite that funds their political campaigns, which is of course the powerful and unaccountable military–industrial–petroleum–banking conglomerate. This is the natural result of a structurally flawed campaign finance system that renders much of Congress and the president incapable of voicing the concerns and interests of the other 98 percent of Americans. Just as President Eisenhower warned us 45 years ago about what might happen; our government now embodies the essence of a protofascist political system that is operating contrary to the welfare of the general citizenry.There is no easy way out, and I do not envy the arduous journey that awaits the 44th president,who will likely face a combined economic and energy crisis. Global monetary reform, including a compromise with the EU regarding the world reserve/petrocurrency issues, implies that the US will have to forfeit its superpower status and revert to being one nation among equals. Many Americans do not want to hear this message, but unless this bitter pill is swallowed, the US economy may experience a disorderly decline, inducing far more pain than would be experienced via multilateral compromises for controlled contraction. Regardless, we may not have the luxury of choice for much longer, as the dictates of the global economy and physics will soon come to the forefront.
The only solution is international cooperation, real leadership, implementation of a phrased
strategy to adjust to oil and gas depletion, reform of the global monetary system, and behavioral changes to reduce our gluttonous addictions to oil and debt. The five US media conglomerates that control 90% of the information flow in the US are not serving the public’s interest and should be broken up by anti-trust legislation. Comprehensive campaign finance reform and the rejection of ‘corporate personhood’ may be the only way for the US to enact the required energy reforms.
To save the American experiment from the shared destiny of all empires — military overextension and subsequent economic decline — I recommend the following six measures.

1. Disavow the Preventive War Doctrine.
2. Launch International Energy Projects.
3. Implement the Oil Depletion Protocol.
4. Restore Fiscal Discipline.
5. Revitalize the US Manufacturing Base with Energy Reconfiguration.
6. Reform the Global Monetary System.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I don't think creating a divided government
Is in our best interest at all just bring about a change in a new direction with all parties involved via the truth is all we need to accomplish what is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. our government is supposed to be divided...
the legislature, judiciary, and executive branches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Potatoes ,carrots, and celery
Makes for a great soup, agreed. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-06-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Agreed, Indeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC