Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CAPTION: Unka Dick with Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 03:42 AM
Original message
CAPTION: Unka Dick with Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like to know just what is being said.
I would probably be disappointed. Bill looks like he is speaking his mind, and cheney looks like he is just wishing he could slither away. Kennedy doesn't look too happy either, but cheney has a more pleasant look on his face to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. What has happened to the side of Ted's face?
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Looks like busted blood vessels.
Maybe from exposure to sun and wind. Happens sometimes. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I hope he's being treated for sun damage, because after treatment it should look better
The tabloids like to print pix of Kennedy and claim his blemishes are gin blossoms due to his drinking, but it's not necessarily so.

If he is being treated for sun damage (aka precancerous lesions) he would probably have been prescribed a cream like Effudex; by the time you've used up the tube, your face and neck look a lot like that. The more bad stuff there is to kill, the worse you look. It's almost as unpleasant as it looks.

He could also have rosacea, which can afflict fair-skinned people.

In any case, if a dermatologist did this to him, he'll get better in a month or two. Right now he certainly doesn't photograph well.

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. I like this body language
I wish I could see Clinton's face. I would hate to be on the receiving end, because I have a feeling it is his penetrating stare. We've all seen it before. Clinton has a formidible intellect and Satan is on the receiving end. If you look on the bottom half of Hillary's face, you will see that is not a smile: it is a smirk. Kick yo' ass.

Satan Cheney is not having a good time in either photograph.

In the second one, he is actually leaning back--away from Ted Kennedy, who is expressing something about which he feels strongly.



Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Look at Bill's finger
It is pointing squarly at cheney, and that is something he was very careful about when he was pres. Remember the three finger point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. no he's not. If you saw the full video clip they were smiling and laughing
Edited on Fri Jan-05-07 05:44 AM by still_one
and bill clinton patted cheney on the shoulder like they were good buds

I don't trust any of them, especially after what we have been through the last six years when the Democrats practically rubber-stamped everything this administration threw at them, including Supreme Court justices

They have the majority now, lets see if they do their job


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Oh my goodness! Bill Clinton displays good manners in public!
What a shock to the nervous system. Have you ever, under any circumstances or any kind of pressure, seen him display BAD manners?

What are you going to scream when you see Pelosi bantering with Republicans?

I'm much too suspicious, I guess. When I see someone spreading disinformation about Democrats, I have ugly thoughts. TWO threads to condemn the Clintons. And Hillary a potential presidential candidate unless someone can make her seem like, say, she's betraying her own party? Yes, these have been difficult years and I am way too suspicious.

Honey, I may have been born yesterday, but I've been in town all morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. No, I don't expect him to display bad manners, but practically embracing the bastard
is not called for, and overdoing it.

To answer you first question have I ever seen him diplay BAD manners? YES, when he betrayed the Democratic party for a blow job.

The SOB was warned by staff that the right wing neocons were out to get us, and to stop screwing around with the intern, and he instead flipped us the byrd. He continued reagan's policies with the communication act which no longer required equal time for opposing points of view, and enabled media mergers which have helped bring us to the state of journalism that we are in now. I am sure many our happy with the wonderful trade agreements his administration negotiated also, which gave all the benefits to corporations, and internaltional interests, and very little to the workers here. Fair trade Mr. Clinton, NOT FREE TRADE, at our expense.

In the last six years VERY FEW DEMOCRATS in Congress stood up for Democratic principles. The IWR and the patriot are the best examples of that, and because of the actions of the Congressional Democrats, NOT only is a woman's right to choose is in jeparody, but so is basic civil rights and privacy issues.

There was only ONE SENATOR WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PATRIOT ACT and that was Russ Feingold.

You and I are both entitled to our respective opinions, but yes, I DO FEEL we have been betrayed, and NOT only by the Clintons

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. The Democrats didn't have the numbers to stop Bush on anything
especially after 2004. Te votes were often split on party lines - with VERY few Republiacans jumping ship on anything.

About the only thing we could have doen that we didn't was stop Alito - but the party leadership really didn't want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Actually during the Dascille Congress they DID HAVE THE NUMBERS
but were AFRAID to stand up

As far as the Supreme court appointments, that wonderful threat where they compromised NOT TO FILIBUSTER because the republicans said they would disallow filibuster if the Democrats did it, with an up or down vote was a disgrace. The Democrats SHOULD HAVE CALLED THEIR BLUFF, let them get rid of the filibuster. What goes around comes around.

Sometime you stand up for what is right, win or lose. Russ Feingold WAS THE ONLY SENATOR WHO VOTED AGAINST THE PARTRIOT ACT because it was the right thing to do, and he read it.

What is your view on investigation of this administration? What if abuse of power or illegal activities, which led us to war in Iraq is found, should impeachment be used? Or should the Democrats just stand down?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. is there something wrong with darth vader's neck? he can't seem to hold his head straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's doin' "The Squirm"
I feel good.

I knew that I would.



Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. All of the awful secrets in there
keep his head tilted like the bad guy's hangouts in Batman TV shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubeskin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here's mine:
Clinton/Cheney:
Clinton: Now I don't want you trying anything funny with her, ya hear? That Lewinsky thing is in the past, and I don't want you making up for it with Hil here.

Kennedy:
I can't think of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. it disturbs me that they are so friendly with that Rat Bastard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bill and Hil... hearts and minds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. very clever of you to do that
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. I take my greatest pleasure in
the swearing in of Sen. Bernie Sanders and Jay Rockefeller being chair of Senate Intelligence and Henry Waxman taking on Bush's many lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. They are a bunch of whores playing us for suckers /nt
The Democrats have two years to grow a backbone and do their job, something they haven't been doing for the last six years


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. No, they don't have 2 years. They have 2 days
tops.

Or the press and GOP will eat them for lunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. My solution
I am presently wearing a t shirt. Says, "Kucinich,'A Democrat with Backbone." The t shirt I take my greatest pride in wearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. You should be proud. People like Dennis will also keep focus on the REAL ISSUES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. I tend to agree, but I do realize that it is the only game in town
which is why change in the Democratic party needs to take place within, and get rid of those who our out for there own self-interest



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-05-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
23. I hate to disillusion some of you, but my guess is that neither Clinton or Kennedy
are confronting Cheney in anyway but actually joshing with him in that Washington insider way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC