Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Firefighter paid while 'away' in Iraq arrested

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:10 PM
Original message
Firefighter paid while 'away' in Iraq arrested
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/195183,CST-NWS-orland03.article

BY ISAAC WOLF Daily Southtown

Last Friday, fellow firefighters praised Lt. Lawrence T. Masa as a warrior, describing his fortitude in Iraq and his bravery for serving multiple tours of duty in the war-torn region. On Tuesday, Orland Park police arrested Masa at fire district headquarters.

For almost two years Masa received his salary while his co-workers and employer, the Orland Fire Protection District, thought he was in the military fighting the war on terror.

'It was a big surprise'

Police accuse Masa, 42, of Morris, of stealing more than $100,000. The state's attorney's office expects to charge him today, Orland Park police spokesman Chuck Doll said.

"The suspect said he had been called up to service when, in fact, he had not," Doll said. "He was paid by the fire department while he was away."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
datadiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. This guy's sentence should be served in Irag. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't know if I would have wanted someone like him for me to maybe have to depend on
I know I wouldn't want to if I had a child in Iraq so I say throw his sorry ass in jail where he belongs, leave the military men and their lives out of it, they didn't do anything to deserve it. As a Soldier one must be honest first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. As much as I oppose the war, I have to agree
In lieu of repayment, make his lies reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. That takes serious balls.
During Vietnam they used to give arrestees the option of doing time or going. I'm not sure this guy should GET an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. How much you wanna bet he was a pro-war blowhard Republican too? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Considering the state of the Illinois GOP
They might just run this guy for governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. They didn't ASK to see his orders?
If I claimed to have been called up, my employer would insist on seeing some type of documentation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't get it, why would they still be paying him?
If they thought he was with the military, not the national guard, are they required to pay him while he's getting paid by the military too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-03-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Lots of employers do continue to pay.
Mostly government agencies, but there are many employers who will continue to pay for X number of months while an employee is actively deployed. This is usually done because military pay is shite, and many of those deployed still have rent, mortgages, and bills to pay, along with spouses and children to feed. Other employers do "partial pays". When my brother-in-law was in Iraq, his employer not only held his job for him for two years, they paid a $1000 a month "deployment salary" to him and everyone else deployed. It's not a huge amount of money, but it helped to close the gap between his regular pay and what the military paid him. Without that extra check, my sister and niece would have been ruined financially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC