Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The thing that Ford was MOST proud of is the biggest stain on democracy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 04:13 AM
Original message
The thing that Ford was MOST proud of is the biggest stain on democracy
Edited on Wed Dec-27-06 04:15 AM by SoCalDem
Every time he was interviewed, he bragged about how he "calmed" the nation.

Well Gerry, sometimes "calm" is not what's needed.

Just as a pregnant woman has to endure a LOT of unpleasantness in order to push that baby out, it still HAS to be done.... matted hair, sweat, blood, husband's shredded hands, trembling legs and curses galore..

Our country had a "back alley abortion" when Nixon was pardoned and allowed to skulk away into history.

When ordinary people screw up, they get a FULL dose of justice, no matter how "unpleasant" it is for the family or the community.

Tonight on Larry King's retrospective of him, one person said "You can't imagine how it was back then, Larry... People were in front of the White house with signs that said 'Honk if you think he's guilty'..and the horns honked all day...It was a desperate time, and Ford brought it all to a halt"..

That fact is this.. We had a RIGHT to be angry and we had a RIGHT to see him face justice.
What he did was WRONG, and with a swipe of a pen, it was all just "over".

Just as in Abu Grahib, some underlings went to jail, but the ones at the top more or less escaped unscathed, and some are in our mis-administration today.. they went on to remain in government, wrote books, and profited from the shenanigans.

A guy who steals lunch meat and cigarettes from 7-11 gets more legal problems than people who can get us all killed with a few words on paper.

Ford did not get re-elected because he took the toady way out. He did not stand up for our constitution and see the process through to the end..no matter how "messy" it would have been.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Indeed.
It literally terrifies me to see liberals here saying he was a decent man.

I mean, Jesus, are Americans really THAT short-sighted? He pardoned a criminal, hello!

Days like this, I don't wonder why this country's sinking - I know. Lack of historical knowledge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. How About This Liberal?
Remarks by Senator Edward M. Kennedy

I'm honored to be here today with President Gerald R. Ford, the winner of this year’s Profile in Courage Award, and Congressman John Lewis, the recipient of the Profile in Courage Lifetime Achievement Award.

In his book, President Kennedy told the stories of courageous political leaders who faced crucial decisions and made them under great pressure, and often at great risk to their own careers. I believe my brother would be especially pleased with our winners this year. He would feel that their stories of courage would have made outstanding new chapters in his book.

At a time of national turmoil, America was fortunate that it was Gerald Ford who took the helm of the storm-tossed ship of state. Unlike many of us at the time, President Ford recognized that the nation had to move forward, and could not do so if there was a continuing effort to prosecute former President Nixon. So President Ford made a courageous decision, one that historians now say cost him his office, and he pardoned Richard Nixon.

I was one of those who spoke out against his action then. But time has a way of clarifying past events, and now we see that President Ford was right. His courage and dedication to our country made it possible for us to begin the process of healing and put the tragedy of Watergate behind us. He eminently deserves this award, and we are proud of his achievement.

http://www.jfklibrary.org/Education+and+Public+Programs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. yes, that liberal too.
kennedy's opinion changes nothing. it would have been nice to see kennedy speak out against clinton's faliure to pardon leonard peltier. funny how these highly placed liberals don't go the other way (to the left). no matter how "liberal" kennedy is, he's part of the power structure that could not afford to expose the real workings of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. Then Ted Was Wrong, Too!
Sorry, but i don't buy the "healing" argument. I was there. I think the closure america needed was one of criminals being brought to justice. We did not get closure by a presidential decree that it was "over".

He bought the presidency with a deal to pardon a felon. No respect there. And if Ted says otherwise, it proves he's human and can be wrong.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. He's wrong. Persuing justice is far more important than letting criminals escape justice.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. I agree, willful ignorance?
This is clip of the documentary "Massacre: the Story of East Timor" that I produced with journalist Alan Nairn.

* Excerpt of "Massacre: the Story of East Timor.”

* Brad Simpson. Research Fellow at the National Security Archives.

* Alan Nairn. Investigative Journalist.

RUSH TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...

AMY GOODMAN: An excerpt of the documentary Massacre: The Story of East Timor which I produced with journalist Alan Nairn who’ll be joining us in a minute. But first to talk more about President Ford's legacy and his role in East Timor, we are joined by Brad Simpson. Brad Simpson works for the National Security Archives and is a Professor at the University of Maryland. Brad, welcome to Democracy Now!.

BRAD SIMPSON: Thank you, very much, for having me on.

AMY GOODMAN: Brad, you recently got documents declassified about President Ford and his role in 1975, in meeting with the long reigning dictator of Indonesia, Suharto. Can you explain what you learned?

BRAD SIMPSON: Yes. Gerald Ford actually met twice with Suharto, first in July of 1975 when Suharto came to the United States. And later in December of 1975, of course, on the eve of his invasion of East Timor. And we now know that for more than a year Indonesia had been planning its armed takeover of East Timor, and the United States had of course been aware of Indonesian military plans. In July of 1975, the National Security Council first informed Henry Kissinger and Gerald Ford of Indonesia’s plans to take over East Timor by force. And Suharto of course raised this with Gerald Ford in July when he met with Gerald Ford at Camp David on a trip to the United States. And then in December of 1975 on a trip through Southeast Asia, Gerald Ford met again with Suharto on the eve of the invasion, more than two weeks after the National Security Council, CIA, other intelligence agencies had concluded that an Indonesian invasion was eminent. And that the only thing delaying the invasion was the fear that US disapproval might lead to a cut-off of weapons and military supplies to the regime.

AMY GOODMAN: How knowledgeable was President Ford at the time of the situation?

BRAD SIMPSON: Well, Ford was very much aware. He was receiving hourly briefings, as was Henry Kissinger, as his plane lifted off from Indonesia, as the invasion indeed commenced. And immediately afterwards Gerald Ford flew to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, or to Guam—excuse me, where he gave a speech saying that never again should the United States allow another nation to strike in the middle of the night, to attack another defenseless nation. This was on Pearl Harbor Day, of course. Realizing full well that another day of infamy was unfolding in Dili, East Timor. As thousands of Indonesian paratroopers, trained by the United States, using US supplied weapons, indeed jumping from United States supplied airplanes, were descending upon the capital city of Dili and massacring literally thousands of people in the hours and days after December 7, 1975.

AMY GOODMAN: Brad, how difficult was it to get this declassified? The memos that you got? And how long were these memos about Ford and Kissinger's meeting with the long reigning Suharto? How long were they kept classified?

BRAD SIMPSON: Well, they are kept classified until the fall of 2002. We now know, actually, that a Congressman from Minnesota, Donald Fraser, had actually attempted to declassify the memo, the so-called Smoking Gun Memo, the transcript of General Suharto’s conversation with Gerald Ford, in December of 1975. Congressman Fraser actually tried to declassify this in document in 1978 during the Suharto adm--or during the Carter years and Carter's National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, realizing full well the explosive nature of this cable would show that the United States had been an accomplice in an international act of aggression, recommended that the State Department refuse to declassify the memo, a mere three years after the invasion.

And it took another 25 years after this episode before the cables were finally declassified and of course much more has come out. And I think it's incontrovertible that the United States played the crucial role in enabling the Indonesian invasion of East Timor. And I think it's wrong to say that Gerald Ford was completely unconcerned with the aftermath of the invasion. We now know that just a few days after the invasion Gerald Ford sent a telegram to the State Department asking that an emergency diplomatic cable be sent to General Suharto, in response to his recent visit. And inside the cable, which was sent by diplomatic pouch from the US Embassy, was a set of golf balls from Gerald Ford.

AMY GOODMAN: As we wrap up, the--you have a large body of declassified documents surrounding Indonesia and East Timor, of which this is a part, at the National Security Archive. If people want to look, where do they go online, Brad Simpson?

BRAD SIMPSON: They can go to www.nsarchive.org. And there is a link to the Indonesia and East Timor document case and project on that website.

AMY GOODMAN: Brad Simpson, I want to thank you for being with us. Of the National Security Archive and Professor of History at the University of Maryland, College Park.

-break-

AMY GOODMAN: : To talk more about President Ford’s legacy and his role in Indonesia and East Timor, joined by colleague and Independent Journalist Allen Nairn, who Co-produced the Documentary Massacre: The Story Of East Timor. Alan, welcome to Democracy Now!

ALLAN NAIRN: : Thanks.

AMY GOODMAN: : We just talked to Professor Brad Simpson who got the document declassified on the National Security Archive website, of President Ford and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's role in giving the green light for the invasion of Timor, December 7, 1975. Can you talk about your interview with President Ford, and the significance of the information that has come out since?

ALLAN NAIRN: : Well, I interviewed Ford by phone, and beforehand had told his assistant that I wanted to discuss his meeting with General Suharto, the Indonesian Dictator, on December 5th. So coming into the interview Ford knew the topic. And when I asked Ford whether he did in fact authorize the invasion of East Timor, he said, “Frankly, I don't recall.” He didn't remember. And I believed him.

What Ford said was that there were many topics on the agenda that day with Suharto. Timor was not very high on the agenda. It was one of the lesser topics, and he just couldn't remember whether he had authorized this invasion, which ended up killing 1/3 of the Timorese population. And it's kind of an illustration of the fact that when, like the United States, you're a global power with regimes everywhere dependant on your weapons, you can start wars, authorize wars, take actions that result in mass deaths in a fairly casual way.

In this case, the US didn't have a great interest in East Timor. All the evidence suggests that they didn’t particularly care one way or the other whether Timor became independent. But as a favor to Suharto, who was close to Washington, who was their protégée, they decided to let him go ahead with the invasion. So, for just a marginal, fleeting gain – or, out of doing a favor for a buddy -- they ended up causing a mass murder that proportionally was the most intensive killing since the Nazis, a third of the population killed.

AMY GOODMAN: : Now documents, Allan Nairn that you did get declassified were a memo that involved Henry Kissinger, again, it was Kissinger and Ford that gave the go ahead for the invasion when they visited Suharto, the long-reigning dictator. And that was information they were getting as they flew out of Indonesia through to Guam and Pearl Harbor, as Brad Simpson described. But what about those documents and Kissinger's reaction?

ALLAN NAIRN: : Well, Kissinger, and Ford, they, one of the points they made to Suharto, was that you have to try to get this invasion over with quickly. And Kissinger when he-- they wanted them to go in intensively, presumably kill as many Timorese as they could quickly. So that it wouldn't get international attention, and also, apparently they were worried that it could get attention in Congress. Because Ford and Kissinger knew that by authorizing this invasion, they were technically violating US law. Because the US weapons laws at the time stated US weapons given to foreign clients could not be used for purposes of aggression. And this was in the judgment of the State Department's own legal analysts, this looked like it would be an act of aggression if Indonesia were to invade East Timor, and that could, technically, if Congress got wind of it and started to pay attention to it, be grounds for stopping, cutting off US weapons supply to Indonesia.

That would have been devastating for the invasion of Timor because about 90% of the Indonesian weapons were coming from the US and they needed spare parts, they needed ammunition, they needed a re-supply. And it also would have been dangerous for the regime of Suharto which was based on repression within Indonesia and needed those weapons to keep their own population down. So Kissinger, in his internal discussions within the state department, was pressing his people to make sure that all information about Timor be kept under wraps. They didn’t want the US Congress paying too much attention to it. As it turned out, I think Kissinger was giving Congress a little too much credit because there was not much evidence at the time that apart from a few members like then-Congressman Tom Harkin, that there was much interest in probing what the US was doing. But Kissinger knew this was an illegal operation so he was trying to keep it quiet.

AMY GOODMAN: : And the information about Suharto's role in general, in Indonesia at the time, as you mentioned both the invasion of East Timor, but Suharto--what happened, how he came to power? The man that eventually Ford and Kissinger would meet with in the capital of Indonesia, Jakarta?

ALLAN NAIRN: : Well, Suharto came to power on the back of essentially a military coup which overthrew Sukarno who was the founding President of Indonesia. And from the period of 1965 to 67, when General Suharto was consolidating his power, his army and groups working with the army carried out a mass slaughter of Indonesian civilians. It's not clear exactly how many were killed, but anywhere from 400,000 to perhaps more than a million Indonesians were massacred as the Suharto regime gained power. And they did this, the military did this with US weaponry. And in fact, the US CIA station even gave a list of 5,000 names of people who they had identified as communists and potential opponents of the army, and they turned this list over to Suharto and his military intelligence people and many of those people were subsequently assassinated.

AMY GOODMAN: : Well, Allan Nairn, I want to thank you, very much for being with us. Allan Nairn, a journalist who interviewed President Ford roughly a decade and a half ago about Ford's involvement in the invasion of East Timor. That was December 7th, 1975 that the invasion occurred.

To purchase an audio or video copy of this entire program, click here for our new online ordering or call 1 (888) 999-3877.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. R'ed earlier.
Here's a :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Like reagan before him, in death he'll be a hero
In life he was truly evil, with a pleasant demeanor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Amen. Nothing wrong with a little ruckus when necessary.
He swept the shit under the carpet and now it's come back out to haunt us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sadly, Ford has enabled the true evil doers to continue on their evil spree.
That in truth is his legacy.

We are all living it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. He did not single-handedly create today's horrors, but his enabling
Edited on Wed Dec-27-06 06:21 AM by EST
of the republican crooks can be traced directly from the lack of a thorough house cleaning and disinfection to the current crowd of self important hacks.

The record of mafioso tactics in the republican party is so obvious and blatant, it is a mystery why it is so invisible to so many.

Even though this super-annuated whore has been rendered ineffective these past thirty years, I feel no sorrow in his passing.

The past ten days have been a victory procession of sorts: two criminals who were granted far longer lives than they should have known-Pinochet and Ford-have passed from the scene and the world is a better place for their passing.

I am, in a way, ashamed of my lack of compassion, but it's one of those things that is so justified that it is irresistible.
We tax payers no longer have to pay for secret service protection for this bad actor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. It Got Him A Profile In Courage Lifetime Achievement Award
Remarks by Senator Edward M. Kennedy

I'm honored to be here today with President Gerald R. Ford, the winner of this year’s Profile in Courage Award, and Congressman John Lewis, the recipient of the Profile in Courage Lifetime Achievement Award.

In his book, President Kennedy told the stories of courageous political leaders who faced crucial decisions and made them under great pressure, and often at great risk to their own careers. I believe my brother would be especially pleased with our winners this year. He would feel that their stories of courage would have made outstanding new chapters in his book.

At a time of national turmoil, America was fortunate that it was Gerald Ford who took the helm of the storm-tossed ship of state. Unlike many of us at the time, President Ford recognized that the nation had to move forward, and could not do so if there was a continuing effort to prosecute former President Nixon. So President Ford made a courageous decision, one that historians now say cost him his office, and he pardoned Richard Nixon.

I was one of those who spoke out against his action then. But time has a way of clarifying past events, and now we see that President Ford was right. His courage and dedication to our country made it possible for us to begin the process of healing and put the tragedy of Watergate behind us. He eminently deserves this award, and we are proud of his achievement.

http://www.jfklibrary.org/Education+and+Public+Programs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. you're perseverating. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. He did end draft registration, and just before I turned 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. really? i remember him saying he knew he was going to hell for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I hope he is there right now
in Hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. no. we're in it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. That is a little over the edge
C'mon. That is just a little over the edge. I would like to think we are a little better than making remarks like that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Well, your little analogy ignores the fact a healthy baby is born after going FULL TERM
did it ever occur to you that the time just wasn't right yet?

Do you really think the GOP would have just stood still?

You think most DEMOCRATS wanted investigations too?

Did you not ever realize that Nixon's resignation was almost certainly part of a deal (no investigations)?

So many DU'ers have no freaking clue what politics is really all about and seem to think it's being an ideologue and ramming your agenda down others throats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. that's just plain ignorant.
did it occur to you WHY (!!!!!) those dems and repubs didn't want investigations. if you believe it was for the good of the country, i've got some swampland in arizona for you. of course it was part of the deal. we don't make deals with the constitution, remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I Guess Caroline And Ted Kennedy Are Ignorant For Giving Ford The Profile In Courage Award
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. I am entitled to my opinion and the Kennedys theirs!
But the elite giving awards to the elite is nothing new. And the Kennedy family does not walk on water so their award to Ford means nothing to me. I was there.
8643
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. He just played party politics
I hate to say it but if it had been reversed, a Democratic president would have pardoned Democrats too. It had nothing to do with "calming the nation" unless attempting to make the nation hate Republicans less is how he defines "calming".

He certainly doesn't deserve to be made a saint over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. Sorry
not dancing on anyone's grave.

RIP Gerald Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. except on the graves of the dead in vietnam.
not impressed with your oh so superior morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Nope.
Not superior at all. Certainly not dancing on the waste of humanity in any ridiculous war. But I choose not to sit and pick at a scab long scarred over just because I'm not a Republican.

That era is over; no reason to gloat over a man's death.

That is all. Enjoy your hostility or whatever it is you've got going there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Again , no gloating here, no hostility here either.
No hatred for the man or his family have I seen here just your pompous high roading! And WRONG we are right in the middle of what that ERA brought to our nation. And no silly award can change that fact.

Its time to understand that a good person can make a mistake and it dose not make them a bad person.

I have admiration for the Ford family and in many ways they were a breath of fresh air for the USA, and a move forward from the Nixon nightmare.

But the best move IMO would have been to understand what went wrong and how to keep it from happening again. That didnt happen, and that was a mistake.

You cannot fix something unless you understand what failed, nothing was fixed so there was no real healing process, for many of us it is still an open wound.

I think you are grave pandering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. I dont think anyone is grave dancing for Jerrold Ford.
But the MSM saying he united the country is just hogwash! I was there as an adult and I didnt feel united. I felt betrayed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
23. Agree...and pardoning Nixon allowed the re-emergence of the same
folks we are dealing with now...doing more crimes.

Thanks for posting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
25. With one swipe of his pen he showed the world that laws are for suckers!
We deserved more than that. Our Nation of laws deserved more than that. You can be the biggest crook in the country, do un-imaginable damage to our fragile democracy but hey we needed to heal.

We needed GD JUSTICE!

We needed to show the world that we regard no one above the law, Fords example demonstrated just the opposite.

Why dont we just open the prison doors to all non violent criminals so the nation can heal?

Fords action was contrary to all I had been taught and all I was led to believe. And the repercussions continue today with some of the same criminal players.

That said, My sympathies go out to Mrs. Ford and their children, the most normal family to occupy the WH in my lifetime.

Had he not pardoned Nixon I would have voted for Ford, truly.

8643





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MamaBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
29. K&R
Well said. He paved the way for Ronald Raygun and the present band of thugs. With a stroke of the pen, he marginalized a whole movement, if not a whole generation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
30. I think it's important to remember what a difficult time that was in history
Between Vietnam, the economy, and then the scandal that led to Nixon's resignation, our nation was floundering badly. I don't necessarily agree with Ford's decision, but I think he at least did it because he believed it was in the best interest of the country.

And Ford got us out of Vietnam. If I had to choose, I would consider that much more important than throwing the book at a man who had already resigned the presidency in disgrace.

Like all presidents, he had his good points and his bad points. For now, I guess I prefer to remember the good he did. Once the nation has paid our respects to this WW2 veteran and lifetime public servant, there will be plenty of time for a more critical assessment of his tenure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Sorry, Can't Agree
He let felons get off scott-free. Resigning the presidency in disgrace is not the same thing as being convicted of crimes committted. As an adult at that time, i think the war, the economy, and the lost trust in gov't was the FAULT OF THE VERY PEOPLE HE PARDONED! So, the floundering was THEIR FAULT! I'm not going to give him a pass on that.

Secondly, i didn't think much of him while he was alive. I saw him as a political opportunist and backroom hack. So, i'm not going to start liking him now.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I respect your view
But if I had to choose one, I would think that our presence in Vietnam was the biggest stain on the nation at the time. To blame it solely on the cabinet Ford inherited is to overlook the roles Kennedy and Johnson played in both getting us into Vietnam, and in perpetuating the nightmare.

As I said, I don't necessarily think Ford made the correct decision in pardoning Nixon- I just don't think that decision alone should necessarily define his presidency. Pulling out of Vietnam strikes me as much more significant.

Then again, maybe Watergate just doesn't seem like such a big deal to me now, after all of the overt corruption and illegal activity we've witnessed at the hands of Bushco. I'm aware that Ford enabled Bush 1, Cheney, and Rumsfeld, but I have a hard time believing that he had any idea of what sort of damage they would bring about in later years. I haven't really kept track of him over the years, so I'm curious to know if Ford has spoken out either in favor or against some of the actions of those he appointed.

I should also disclose that I was a child during Ford's tenure. I might have a completely different view of him, had I really been aware of some of the political nuances at the time. I'm pretty much going by what I've been taught about Ford, not really what I lived. I'm sure that makes a big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. A Couple Of Other Points
Remember that the Ford solution to inflation (which ran rampant during his and the later Nixon years) was empty sloganeering on top of wage and price controls. But, the wage controls were so strict that they didn't allow for the increases in energy costs, so consumption dropped dramatically. His economic policies were disasterous!

Another thing, is that Watergate has had this "not that big a deal" among the so-called Silent Majority of the time. Well, to those folks, (some of whom are now telling the history), it wasn't a big deal, but subverting the Constitution, fixing a national election, spreading falsehoods about political opponents, spying on citizens, etc. etc. etc. was a pretty damned big deal. So, when Ford pardoned these guys over the simpering excuse of "time to heal" lots of us were rightfully outraged. Nobody elected Ford to "heal the nation". He was an appointed president who should not have taken upon himself the decision to ignore the people. The majority wanted justice to be done. He, and he alone, decided justice wasn't necessary. That, to me, is reason to think poorly of his time in office.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
33. The "HONK if he's guilty" signs in fornt of the White House--
Let's ressurect that fine tradition. Poor Bushie will hear the TRUTH a thousand times a day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. That was when the street was still open to traffic
I don;t think you can get that close anymore.. and who knows if a "permanent" protest would be allowed these days.

Things were more fluid back then ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
37. Yes, that pardon brought the whole stinking bunch of them
back into our government. They weren't punished for their wrong doings. If we do the same with this administration, those criminals will get recycled back into our government at a future date as well. It's time to pull these weeds up by the roots and throw them on to the compost pile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsdude Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
38. Watergate, as government conspiracies go ...
was nothing ...

Jeezus.

The zealots have it in for Ford today, don't they.

In my mind, Ford was a rather inconsquential president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. So, do you think Nixon shouldn't have resigned?
Or that he shouldn't have been impeached, had he not resigned? That would seem to be the clear implication of saying Watergate "was nothing".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsdude Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. He had to resign ...
So yeah, he should have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. But do you think he deserved to resign?
He didn't "have to resign" - there was no law saying he had to resign. He could have fought impeachment, just as Clinton did. If he lost he could have fought it in the Senate, just as Clinton did.

Your response dodges the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Yep.. Nixon took the chickenshit (pre-arranged) way out,
When you really think about it, if the vice president's a crook and has to resign, and then the president's a crook and feels the need to resign, that should pretty well invalidate the whole previous election. They should have to turn the keys over to the people they defeated in that last election..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. So watergate was nothing, but monica-gate was impeachment-worthy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newsdude Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Where did I say that?
Watergate was a crime. Nixon was foolish.
What they did was far worse than Monica gate.

But what Nixon did was get caught playing dirty politics. And, from what I've read, he was sabotaged by his own allies. Republicans who proved far more dangerous than Nixon ever was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. As a person who was aware of all this when it occured,
I wanted Mr. Nixon to be called to account for his deeds, not pardoned for them! It was a blatant example of partisan politics and everyone knows that. We just don't talk about it is all..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
46. Cover-up.
He didn't get the VP job without agreeing in advance to pardon. Protest signs and honks are not a national emergency, and certainly no reason to suspend the rule of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. I don't know if he had to agree in advance
Ford was the sort who was known to be "reliable". Look at what he did while sitting on the Warren Commission - the PTB knew he wouldn't rock the boat about Nixon.

That's not to say there couldn't have been some pre-arrangement, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. Ford was the go-to guy, indeed.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/28/AR2006122801247.html

"Anytime you want me to do anything, under any circumstances, you give me a call, Mr. President," he told Nixon during that May 1, 1973, conversation. "We'll stand by you morning, noon and night."

"I looked upon him as my personal friend. And I always treasured our relationship. And I had no hesitancy about granting the pardon, because I felt that we had this relationship and that I didn't want to see my real friend have the stigma."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Damning words indeed
His friendship with Nixon took precedence over the rule of law, like some kind of corrupt medieval court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC