Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have any conservatives spoken out against Bush illegal wiretaps?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:14 PM
Original message
Have any conservatives spoken out against Bush illegal wiretaps?
I'm writing an editorial for our local paper and would like to include mention of any prominent conservatives who have condemned Bush's trampling of the constitution, if any.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cal Thomas, I believe
It's about the only issue I've ever found myself agreeing with him.

Confused grammar, but you get the point, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sen. Arlen Specter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Although Arlen Specter is a Republican, few would classify him
as a conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I have always thought of him as a conservative leaning Moderate.
That is, he believes in the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. here's one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tucker had his bowtie in a twist the other night about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bob Barr - I heard him on "Air America" this morning
He was on Stephanie Miller's show (Johnny Wendell was the substitute host.) He's practically frantic about it. He also says Arlen Specter is holding the line in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. George Will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat@14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Texas Congressman Ron Paul. I just posted his comments.
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 01:23 PM by splat@14
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah, but he's a hard-core libertarian
which isn't the same as a modern-day conservative...

Sorry, I'm nitpicky today :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat@14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No problem! Yeah, I know. It's just refreshing to see something
other than rubber stamp politics out of anyone here in Texas that call themselves a Republican.

Give `em hell Meg!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Barrons Magazine!
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 02:22 PM by AndyTiedye
Barrons magazine came out for impeachment.

AS THE YEAR WAS DRAWING TO A CLOSE, we picked up our New York Times and learned that the Bush administration has been fighting terrorism by intercepting communications in America without warrants. It was worrisome on its face, but in justifying their actions, officials have made a bad situation much worse: Administration lawyers and the president himself have tortured the Constitution and extracted a suspension of the separation of powers.

...Putting the president above the Congress is an invitation to tyranny. The president has no powers except those specified in the Constitution and those enacted by law. President Bush is stretching the power of commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy by indicating that he can order the military and its agencies, such as the National Security Agency, to do whatever furthers the defense of the country from terrorists, regardless of whether actual force is involved.

Surely the "strict constructionists" on the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary eventually will point out what a stretch this is. The most important presidential responsibility under Article II is that he must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." That includes following the requirements of laws that limit executive power. There's not much fidelity in an executive who debates and lobbies Congress to shape a law to his liking and then goes beyond its writ.

Willful disregard of a law is potentially an impeachable offense. It is at least as impeachable as having a sexual escapade under the Oval Office desk and lying about it later. The members of the House Judiciary Committee who staged the impeachment of President Clinton ought to be as outraged at this situation. They ought to investigate it, consider it carefully and report either a bill that would change the wiretap laws to suit the president or a bill of impeachment....

http://online.barrons.com/article_email/SB113538491760731012-lMyQjAxMDE1MzI1NDMyODQ0Wj.html



I think this really is a big deal with the "have-mores".

Many of them are now imagining the consequences of their company's secrets being passed on to better-connected competitors.

The financial value of the information in the NSA's database is so huge as to guarantee that it is being misappropriated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Maybe DU could alert
some businesses about their rivals getting an edge from bushie and co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It Is Possible to Order Reprints of the Barrons Article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC