Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The leg thing is a distraction.. nothing more..nothing less

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:42 PM
Original message
The leg thing is a distraction.. nothing more..nothing less
When was the last time we even SAW a picture with Laura's legs?

She's always wearing pantsuits or long gowns.

This whole thing is just another pathetic ploy to
change the subject" and to somehow catapult her into a position of "spockslady" for skin cancer..

If they had "wanted" to keep this quiet, it would have been oh-so simple, but since the surgery, she all of a sudden feels compelled to show a little leg :puke:

and guess what?

it's working :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. 'Spockslady' Yep, that's what she is alright. (Part Vulcan.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar......
Trying to make this into some kind of conspiracy makes us look like moonbats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Except this is the first time I've ever SEEN her legs. She always wears pants
or a long gown.

It's definitely being "milked".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Indeed
So she had skin cancer and wanted to show her leg. We had Johnson and his appendix scar. Big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sacajawea Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. IIRC, LBJ showed a gallbladder scar...pulling his shirt up was one thing...
(and the picture is still lodged in my brain, taking up space), but pulling his pants down would have been quite another! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. She probably intentionally got cancer just to f*ck with us.
/sarcasm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. never said she did.. Just that the reaction to the press' interest
is a little bit too much...by half.

The WH wanted it noticed or mzLauraB would'a kept on wearin' those dee-lightful pantsuits she ALWAYS wears..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. I forgot which forum I was in.
I saw the title and I thought this was a Lounge picture thread.











:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snogirl Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. laura who? (MSNBC streaming video (mms) link anyone????)
i guess i am not sure if i get u- are u speaking of laura bush?...who is this laura?


by the by, does anyone have a link to MSNBC live stream?...the mms plz?...
or other good streams on the net?...

thx... ^_^ ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Too bad the media doesn't focus on all of the Americans who
can't just pop into their doctors office (no insurance) and have a suspicious blotch on the skin looked at....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. I agree... it's a distraction
while skin cancer is a very serious issue, pimping her 'privacy' to garner sympathy for her fuck-up of a husband is going a little too far... funny, how earlier in the week when she was backhanding Rice, the reporter didn't notice a big 6-inch patch on her leg and ask her what that was about. Perhaps it was because she was wearing pants and there wasn't any cancer issues with her. She's not above the suspicion of allowing Rove and his ilk to make it up to get sympathy, attention and be a distraction. All of a sudden, she's wearing skirts? I've always seen her in pants and long dresses.

And of course, the media has gotten on its knees again with this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. exact.y
and we are not bad for speaking the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartRN Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. So true...
I'm pretty sure that squamous cell carcinoma is so common and easily treated, it's not even counted on overall cancer statistics.

Pathetic attempt at diverting attention away from anything important. Of course the media is as distractable as a 4-year-old with severe ADHD, so it was on every frickin' news broadcast I saw today :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Hi BleedingHeartRN!!
Welcome to DU! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yep...SoCal...a "Truth to Power" Post...and thanks for it!
Sympathy for something many of us have had and not gone around chirping about because our Hubby or SO was in deep trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC