Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Crichton's Poison Pen, Aimed Straight At Michael Crowley's Penis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:32 PM
Original message
Michael Crichton's Poison Pen, Aimed Straight At Michael Crowley's Penis
Apparently blockbuster novelist Michael Crichton, not content with making up science to debunk global warming, is now taking literary swipes at journalists who write stuff about him that he doesn't like. In his new book, Next, he introduces a character called "Mick Crowley" — a Washington political columnist who rapes a two-year old boy. Funnily enough, Crichton was the target of a highly critical New Republic cover story earlier this year....by Washington political writer Michael Crowley, who often goes by "Mike." Which sounds an awful lot like "Mick."

Crichton's literary hit can be found on all of two pages in his book, but it's memorable. Here's an excerpt:

Alex Burnet was in the middle of the most difficult trial of her career, a rape case involving the sexual assault of a two-year-old boy in Malibu. The defendant, thirty-year-old Mick Crowley, was a Washington-based political columnist who was visiting his sister-in-law when he experienced an overwhelming urge to have anal sex with her young son, still in diapers.

Charming! It's minds like that which merit private sit-down meetings with the President of the United States. Crowley — the real, non-raper of babies Crowley, that is — is pretty sure that Crichton meant the allusion as a dig, calling it "a literary hit-and-run" on today's TNR.com and confirming that at least some of the details about the fictional Crowley dovetail with the original: Both are Washington political writers, both went to Yale, both are in their 30s, both seem to not be Michael Crichton's favorite people.

There is one detail, however, that Crowley singles out as telling: The fictional Crowley is characterized as having a small penis (this detail is important to the narrative insofar as it show's Crichton's disturbing attention to detail). Crowley addresses this point head on by raising the little-known "Small Penis Rule," sourced to a 1998 New York Times article:

(I)t is a sly trick employed by authors who have defamed someone to discourage their targets from filing lawsuits. As libel lawyer Leon Friedman explained to the Times, "No male is going to come forward and say, 'That character with a very small penis, 'That's me!'"

Crowley, however, sees smallness not in his own penis, but in Crichton's heart, taking the literary low-blow as the highest compliment: That he was right. Says Crowley:

Call it the small man rule: If someone offers substantive criticism of an author, and the author responds by hitting below the belt, as it were, then he's conceding that the critic has won.

There's a "Penis, Mightier Than The Sword" joke in here somewhere.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/2006/12/14/michael-crichtons-poison_e_36309.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've got to ask you about the penis mightier, Trebek!
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 01:35 PM by Kelly Rupert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hate "ooks" and their "riters". The lack of imagination in this petty act of revenge
is pretty revealing of Crichton's "talents"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Previous thread:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. D'Oht!
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where's the condmenation from the right-wing in this country?
Remember all the hell they raised about Webb's novels? Yet here is Crichton, a right-wing nutjob himself, writing about grown men having anal sex with young boys - WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't understand what people see in Crichton's writing
"Prey" was derivative, shallow, silly. Kind of like Crichton's view of global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. What do they see?
Dinosaur movies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I don't understand why this needs to be posted here -- the OP, not
your comment.

Pointless. Except, of course, it lets people talk about penises, which apparently pleases some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. If all the airport bookstores were suddenly shut down for some reason...
... Chrichton would never sell another book again.

His stuff is peddled in airports to an audience wanting something fluffy to read as they while away a few hours.

They sure get that with Chrichton. Too bad they're now getting lame little diatribes with it, too.

I think "Congo," years ago, was the first sign I saw that the writing center of his brain had rotted away. Whew, was that a stinker!

Then I picked up "State of Fear" -- yes, in an airport -- and didn't know whether to laugh or scream at the ham-fisted characterization and Ayn Rand-like sanctimony. Poorly-crafted, even by propaganda piece standards.

:eyes:






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Too funny
That's exactly where I bought "Prey" (I did learn a valuable lesson, though)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Seems Michael Crichton is just getting smaller and smaller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samfishX Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. I used to really enjoy his writing
...but now, the guy just seems like such a dick that I honestly can't overlook it.

I haven't been able to read a Crichton book in some number of years..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpoffdaplanet Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Aren't writers supposed to write from their experiences?
Members of Crichton's extended family would do well to remember that adage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Crichton is awful, and his writing sucks, too
To date, he's had one work of any quality, and 99% of the quality comes from its adaptation to the screen, rather than from the original writing. He's a hack and always has been. Worse, it's impossible to read any of his crap without an awareness that it's being written as a novelized screenplay.

His characters are horrible, his plots are horrible, and his style is horrible. I don't care if he's the wealthiest man in the universe; he can't write worth shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's Freaking Sick..
It says more about the state of michael crichton's mind than anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC