Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If a Senator is not able to serve should the Gov. appoint a member of...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:12 PM
Original message
Poll question: If a Senator is not able to serve should the Gov. appoint a member of...
the same political party to take that Senator's place in the Senate? I think this is an interesting question and traditionally if a Senator has to leave office for some reason--such as incapacitation, death or taking on another job--the governor appoints a member of the party he or she represents, not necessarily the same party as the Senator who left office.

Case in point is the 1991 death of Republican Senator John Heinz of Pennsylvania in a plane crash. Democratic Governor Casey appointed Democrat Harris Wofford to take Heinz' place in the Senate.

Another case in point is after the assassination of Senator Robert Kennedy of NY, Republican Governor Nelson Rockefeller appointed a Republican, Charles Goodell to fill Kennedy's seat.

I have been thinking about this for some time and my feeling is that the Governor, no matter what party they represent, should appoint somebody who represents the same political party that won the last Senate election to that vacancy. Under this reasoning, the GOP Governor of SD would, if need be, appoint a democrat to fill Johnson's seat. By the same token if Sen. Craig Thomas, who has been diagnosed with leukemia, suddenly leaves office, our Dem. Gov. of Wyoming should then appoint a Republican.

What do you think? Should the Governor appoint a member of his own political party to a open senate seat which was represented by a member of the opposing party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. He'll be there, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. that is not what this post is about
it is a general question which Senator Johnson's situtation has brought front and center. We all hope he will be there, but if he or any other Senator isn't, what is the best way to fill the vacancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Aren't there already rules for this, at the state level if not the federal? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. not necessarily
there are rules about when to hold a special election, but if a Governor has the right to appoint a replacement there are no iron clad rules about what party they represent. As the post suggests traditionally the governors appoint people from their own parties, not necessarily from the party that the senator represented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. In cases of health and personal tragedy, it should be required the replacement be from same party
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 12:20 PM by brentspeak
In cases where a Senator resigns for non-health or non-family reasons -- say for corruption charges -- the governor should be able to appoint without restrictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bufffbison Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. truthfully the best way is to hold a special election.. imo nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. you are probably correct about that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Something must be done, and it needs to be a federal law
Since there is obviously potential for abuse.

I wouldn't have said this before we all witnessed the attempted assassination of several Democrats in 2001 via the US Mail system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC