Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

only candidates against IRAQ - if they voted for Iraq they are not good decision makers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 10:41 AM
Original message
only candidates against IRAQ - if they voted for Iraq they are not good decision makers
Edited on Wed Dec-13-06 10:46 AM by 28erl
if those of us here knew it was a bad idea and the senators did not - then I don't want them leading our country because they are not smart enough to think and make decisions that are good for the whole -

I knew during the first election that if * got into office - there would be a war - period - anyone who could not figure that out - does not deserve to lead this great country -

so far the only ones to do that are Dennis Kunich and Howard Dean

Anyone who waffles about how or why they voted for war - we don't need - if they can not or will not find another way to change things in the world other than war games we don't need them

Teaching our young to hate and kill people is not good for this world - Our are Being TRAINED to kill

The DC sniper and Timonthy McVeigh were trained by the USA killers who never shut off that switch once returning home - how many messed up young lives on both sides do we need to know war is no good.

I want a anti-war candidate who is a good negotiator and can talk intelligently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. That was one reason I was for Dean and Kucinich
in 2004. They spoke out against the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty-Taylor Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. They aren't worthy of office. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. agreed 100 percent....
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-13-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC