|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 09:20 PM Original message |
Only Impeachment. Only Impeachment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. followed by indictment, conviction, and imprisonment.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 10:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Hear, hear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 11:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Rinse. Repeat. (Ubetcha!) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frankly_fedup2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 08:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
74. Only if hanging within 30 days is an option (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. "reversal of every act and appointment" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 10:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Sorry, not a "real" Senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 11:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
88. Ding Ding Ding WINNER WINNER Ding Ding Ding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Golden Raisin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Bravo! Bravo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MazeRat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. Do you actually believe that ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irreverend IX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 02:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
132. You're welcome to join the reality-based community any time you like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. Got to to, got to go n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
6. Only impeachment can give us President Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 11:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Even if that were not even more unlikely than impeachment itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 09:32 AM Response to Reply #11 |
26. Unlikely? Who do you think becomes President if Bush is removed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 12:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. "There is 0% chance. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. 0% chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:25 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Can't know how many will choose to defend the indefensible until. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. No, we really *can* know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:37 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Q: Are humans omniscient? A: No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:43 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. The sun will come up tomorrow, kittens will remain adorable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:56 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Predictions on scientific theory don't require omniscience. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:32 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. Applying common sense, logic, and past experience is not claiming "omniscience" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:07 PM Response to Reply #39 |
50. No; Republican lawmakers want to appeal to Republican voters most. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 03:37 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. Actually you are very wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 04:01 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Nixon was not impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 08:18 PM Response to Reply #63 |
75. Once the investigations start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:48 AM Response to Reply #75 |
119. Perhaps. I hope so. But you're right that investigations, not impeachment, is the first step. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 08:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
76. Clown. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ItsTheMediaStupid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 10:05 PM Response to Reply #36 |
80. I call Bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 03:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
57. No, it requires 67 Senators willing to convict... name them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ItsTheMediaStupid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 10:24 PM Response to Reply #57 |
81. Just start investigating. 67 will appear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:49 AM Response to Reply #81 |
120. I think you're right. Investigations are where we start. Not impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 05:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. So let him run. WHO is going to vote for him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 09:22 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. You want to run against an incumbent in '08? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patchuli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 11:00 PM Response to Reply #24 |
83. What makes you so sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lowell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
35. So what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. You misunderstand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 11:47 PM Response to Reply #6 |
89. Not to worry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. Only Impeachment, Indeed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
10. fialure to pursue impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-12-06 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. k/r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
14. Kick and Rec!! Only impeachment can break their bonds of complicity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:04 AM Response to Original message |
16. Oh Cool! Another 'Think Exactly As I Do Or You're Pond Scum' Thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ani Yun Wiya (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 04:17 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. A couple of questions for ya... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 03:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
58. But you're not for strong action are you? You are for impeachment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 05:20 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. "for impeachment which is just shooting guns in the air until you have 67 Senators ready to convict" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ani Yun Wiya (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 11:21 PM Response to Reply #58 |
85. Impeachment is where strong action merely begins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:02 AM Response to Reply #85 |
122. No, the real work starts before impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 03:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
60. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 05:28 PM Response to Reply #60 |
70. That is truly sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:10 AM Response to Original message |
17. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:18 AM Response to Original message |
18. the overriding problem we face is that our crises are so severe that . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 11:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
29. We reclaim our authority over Corps by reclaiming our sovereignty thru impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullwinkle925 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:46 AM Response to Original message |
19. Very eloquently stated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 06:04 AM Response to Original message |
22. There does not appear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
23. Agreed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
25. Impeach. Indict. Imprison........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
27. Not going to happen when people like Conyers and Kucinich oppose it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 03:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
56. Perhaps, but opposition can be dropped in an instant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seize the time (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
28. Thank God for one brave lady... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
30. Face the facts: impeachment is not a possibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 12:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patchuli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 11:25 PM Response to Reply #32 |
87. Thank you!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. See Reply #39 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
48. you are repeating opinions as fact that were challenged elsewhere and unanswered by you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:12 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. I can only explain the back so many layers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:28 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Your faith-based negative prognosticating has no guarantee of coming true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:31 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. LOL. Hey pot the kettle is calling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. please let us know when you have something to contribute beyond nonsense personal attacks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
31. I agree with you in theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
34. It's not going to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. What could possibly more egregious than . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #34 |
49. We've heard that before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
novalib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
38. Impeachment MUST Happen!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:45 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. What do you think will happen if Bush is impeached? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
42. I'll kick that. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
61. No, silly. Everyone knows letting criminals slide so we can win in '08... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 11:02 PM Response to Reply #61 |
84. Why not - it's always worked before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
62. Once we unearth the true horrors of this administration... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 04:28 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. You are correct to realize that there are steps that must precede impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patchuli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #66 |
86. And how do you know that for a fact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 05:16 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. They have been "unearthed" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 09:07 PM Response to Reply #68 |
77. I honestly dont think everything has been revealed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Plenty of time for more after we've removed the sharp knives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
64. Eloquent and truthful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
65. What can a non-impeached prez do that an impeached prez cannot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 05:48 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. Claim complicity/approval from and exoneration by... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 06:17 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. Ya mean like Reagan/Bush1 and Iran/Contra?.............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 09:57 AM Response to Reply #71 |
121. No exoneration until acquittal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
volstork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
67. Standing ovation! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
73. We need two thirds of the Senate to remove the Bushista from office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 02:29 AM Response to Reply #73 |
91. No, not necessarily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 01:14 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Your post denotes the NEED for formal investigations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 03:50 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 04:51 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. You've mentioned 4 Senators, now show me how we will gain the remaining 20 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 04:53 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. then INVESTIGATE, hold HEARINGS, then IMPEACH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 06:14 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. Some don't like the "investigate" part. They feel it's unnecesary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 06:42 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. Let's move on with what we agree on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 07:17 PM Response to Reply #100 |
104. I'll do that when others quit chastising the position that we need to hold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 09:12 PM Response to Reply #104 |
111. We need to investigate/impeach Bushco and yer worried about being "chastised"?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 11:44 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Oh puleeze. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 06:04 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Well, you misstate the math and the objective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 06:11 PM Response to Reply #97 |
98. I was speaking about REPUBLICAN Senators. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 06:53 PM Response to Reply #98 |
102. these negative assumptions so many are making are false, misleading and impossible to predict!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 07:13 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. I'm not opposed to impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 07:25 PM Response to Reply #103 |
105. Thank You MzMolly For Your Defense Of Many Of Our's Position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 07:30 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Awe shucks, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 08:38 PM Response to Reply #103 |
108. It is unecessary to keep arguing that sticking point against allies. Time to agree and act. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. Are you speaking to me or the person who said "we don't need to investigate?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 09:02 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. Are you aware of the investigations and articles of impeachment that already exist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 11:53 PM Response to Reply #110 |
115. Of course I am. Uhm, I'm on John Conyers mailing list for one thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 11:52 AM Response to Reply #115 |
127. The arguments I've seen seem to be over word usage rather than concepts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 01:29 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. Not so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 02:16 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. Did you read my posts or the link at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 02:54 PM Response to Reply #131 |
134. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 09:23 PM Response to Reply #98 |
112. So was I -- and the math was wrong on them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 11:58 PM Response to Reply #112 |
116. Considering my point about the judiciary and people like Gonzalez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 12:51 AM Response to Reply #116 |
118. It isn't "my" point on war crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 01:28 PM Response to Reply #118 |
129. Ah, the desperate strawman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:23 AM Response to Reply #129 |
137. Yes, you used it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 01:48 AM Response to Reply #137 |
138. No, I didn't use it, you did. You mentioned "torture" as if the fact that I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 06:09 AM Response to Reply #138 |
139. No, "impeachment hearings" vs. "investigations" is not parsing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 12:24 PM Response to Reply #139 |
141. Enter yet another straw-man. Who said "impeachment" hearings VS. investigations?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:46 AM Response to Reply #141 |
142. No, Pelosi said "off the table" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 02:52 AM Response to Reply #142 |
144. Again, who said making the accusation is "contrary to the pursuit of justice?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 10:16 AM Response to Reply #144 |
145. Apparently you didn't realize that you had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 03:00 PM Response to Reply #145 |
146. That's because I didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 10:21 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. Well, it's there to be read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 01:46 AM Response to Reply #147 |
148. Perhaps you can quote me specifically since it's "there to be read." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 07:25 AM Response to Reply #148 |
149. I did quote you ... you repeated the quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 04:01 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. Funny, I still don't see that quote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-19-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #150 |
151. And yet you quoted it back n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
78. Only impeachment! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NotGivingUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-13-06 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
82. impeachment and conviction...nothing less!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnotherDreamWeaver (917 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
90. Right On |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
92. His handling of the Katrina situation alone is worth impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cool user name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
101. Abso-fucking-lutely! IT'S IMPERATIVE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobthedrummer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
107. Cheney first...it's not off my table, nor most of the citizens that voted 11-7. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-14-06 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
114. Deleted message |
Jeffersons Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
117. ASK AND YE SHALL RECEIVE! read this.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
123. "Investigation of is a word of of uncertainty." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:35 AM Response to Reply #123 |
125. Actually, being comprehensive is counterproductive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 04:03 PM Response to Reply #125 |
135. I don't agree that they're counterproductive, they're simply unnecessary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
124. It's a waste of time.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #124 |
126. It's almost like they... want to stop the torture?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
128. What is Impeachment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 02:25 PM Response to Reply #128 |
133. "Impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-15-06 06:29 PM Response to Reply #133 |
136. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-16-06 08:10 AM Response to Original message |
140. I concur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-17-06 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
143. J'Accuse!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC