........he and incoming Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-MS) have failed to get along. Rove whipped that "Strom" business into a absolute frothing frenzy, specifically to dethrone Lott. Hell, Lott went on BET and apologized. He did everything but wear a dashiki and write out the "I Have a Dream" speech a hundred times in penance. Every time the furor started to die down, and some other Black leader would go on TV and say "Well, we know what old Trent is, and we know where he came from, and he came up in a different time, but he did prostrate himself and beg our forgiveness, so we should accept the man's apology" old Karl would send some snarling shitheel Republican out there to fan those flames yet again. EVERY time it looked like Lott would struggle through with a thousand mea culpas, he got slapped back right as it looked that he was coming out of the worst of it. After interminable weeks of a story that should have lasted one week, tops, he threw in the towel. Lott was driven out by Rove, and no one else, in order to install Frist the Puppet in his stead. Frist was way too willing to be a useful tool to BushCo, while Lott has always believed in the separation of powers. He strongly supports the role of the Senate to advise and consent. That, however, got in the way of the White House agenda.
As for Trent's attitudes, the prevailing view has always been "We KNOW what he is. We know what he's ALWAYS been. It has NEVER been a secret. But so long as he brings home jobs and bucketloads of PORK that don't discriminate on the basis of race, well, who CARES? We don't want to associate any more than we have to with HIM, either!"
And that's the truth. You can see the dichotomy that is Trent in this recent article:
http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2006/11/post_48.htmlLott's apologies then were profuse, but the damage lingers. One reason the Thurmond remark hurt Lott so badly was because it suggested he had never really shed a past that included opposition to integrating his fraternity when he was a student at Ole Miss, or, years later, to creation of a national holiday honoring the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.
Some African-American politicians and activists are wary of cutting him much slack. "The sting of Trent Lott's hateful words (is) unlikely to expire anytime soon," says Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C., chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus. The NAACP gave Lott an "F" on its 2005 congressional report card.
Yet this isn't the entire picture. Lott gets kudos from other African-Americans. "He's done a lot for Mississippi," says political activist Charles Evers, an assistant to the mayor of Jackson, Miss. "When he helps Mississippi, he helps me." Donna Brazile, a national Democratic strategist, tells how Lott helped get medical supplies to two of her Mississippi relatives after Hurricane Katrina, which wiped out Lott's own home on the Gulf Coast. "I can speak up for (that) Trent Lott," Brazile says.
Beyond constituent service, the real test for Lott is how he acts on issues of civil rights. In a state that is more than one-third black, will he promote more African-Americans for federal court vacancies? Will he stick up as much for historically black colleges as he does for Ole Miss? Will he, in general, make equality of opportunity a priority?
America is all about second chances, and Trent Lott has gotten a very big one. Now it's up to him to show he deserves it. The vote returning Lott to the Whip job had much more to do with the GOP repudiating the heavy-handedness of the WH than it did any endorsement of Trent's racist past. I know the GOP aren't poster children when it comes to race, but that vote was more of a "Screw YOU, Karl Rove" than it was a "Hail, Whitey" declaration.