Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Australian Company Knew About Iraq Plans A Year Before Invasion- IMPEACH!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 09:53 AM
Original message
Australian Company Knew About Iraq Plans A Year Before Invasion- IMPEACH!
AWB 'knew Iraq plans a year before'

AAP

23 November 2006

A YEAR before the invasion of Iraq, the then Australian ambassador to the United Nations, John Dauth, confidentially told AWB's former chairman Trevor Flugge the Howard Government would participate in miliary action with the US to overthrow Saddam Hussein, new AWB documents reveal.

AWB Board minutes show Mr Flugge told the AWB board on February 27, 2002, that Mr Dauth confided in him that he believed US military action to depose Saddam Hussein was inevitable and that the Australian Government would support and participate in such action, Fairfax newspapers report.

The documents, released at the Cole inquiry yesterday, undercut previous statements by Prime Minister John Howard that Australia did not agree to join the war before the UN debate in late 2002 and early 2003.

The conversation between Mr Dauth and Mr Flugge is reported to have taken place 13 months before the military action began.

http://extras.geelongadvertiser.com.au/rss_article.php?news_id=506
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. there is ample evidence for this, IMO
Downing Street Memo, Richard Clarke, and on and on.

Impeach, and Indict for war crimes, or send the lot of them to the Hague to stand before the ICC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And Jack Abramoff too
"It seems that the President was very sad to have to come out negatively regarding Israel but that they needed to mollify the Arabs for the upcoming war on Iraq." ~ March 18, 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. AND Prince Bandar was told we'd bombed Baghdad BEFORE COLIN POWELL! No joke.
Google it up. It's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thedeanpeople Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. <deleted>
Edited on Fri Nov-24-06 03:09 PM by thedeanpeople
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think most everyone knows by now that BushCo had their Iraq plans . . .
pretty well set before the shrub was even elected . . . I mean selected . . . that in itself is sufficient reason to impeach -- although I'm still not convinced that, for purely practical reasons, impeachment is a wise way to proceed . . . I reserve the right to change my mind, however . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsmesgd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. so , this is smoking gun number 19 or 20
This is oficially the ? number piece of evidence. How many will it take. Do we need to have something on a camera phone like the Michael Richards event for something to change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Google "Andrew Wilkie" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-24-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, no, impeachment is for sex between consenting adults. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC