Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Go Big, Go Long or Go Home" BS Is Childish & Transparent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:17 AM
Original message
"Go Big, Go Long or Go Home" BS Is Childish & Transparent
Edited on Tue Nov-21-06 12:18 AM by stopbush
Today's childish meme - which the MSM has gladly bought into - is that there are three options in Iraq. Of course,
every idiot on TV says that Go Home and Go Big are rejected out of hand...so that leaves us with Go Long. Whoppitydo!
We have a winner, a winner framed by two stupid options that aren't serious options at all. What fucking brainiac came
up with this scheme? I see it from my kids all the time: "Dad, you can either buy me a new house, a new car...or a new PlayStation3."
Hmm? I guess I'll go stand in line for two days and risk getting shot to get that PS3 because that's "the best option."

How about this: "none of the above"?

JFTDC, how idiotic and childish are these people? Why not say the options are Go Long, G-Go Dance or Go
Directly To Jail? There's three options where two can be rejected out of hand as well to leave us with the soon-to-be-
enshrined-in-blood "Go Long."

They really think we're all stupid, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Cake or death?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Cake or Death...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Let them eat liberty?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. LOL! :-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Memes have worked before to rally support for war
"Remember the Alamo!"

"Remember the Maine!"

And we darn near got into a war over "54-40 or fight!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Get lucky, go back in time, guess well
"They really think we're all stupid, don't they?"
I think almost half really are, and then some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. tHERE ARE THREE WAYS TO SOLVE THIS
planes,trucks, and ships, all heading west from Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. Either they are deliberately using gaming words to rally the
home team fans to a new game plan or they are truly adolescent in problem solving skills. All throughout this war, I have believed that there is a videogame mentality to it. You push buttons or triggoers adn the "bad guys" disappear in a poof. Then you ignore the pool of blood left behind and don't make the connection between those pools of blood and the deep resentment toward us by the people of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Diplomacy in ending a war is not a "Slogan".....and our troops
are not pawns in a game of American politics.

There is a way out, but it doesn't fit into any of the slogan length required.

It involves using U.S. redeployment as bargaining power in a regional summit....with all of the neigboring countries and Iraq and the U.S.

It's Clark's proposal.....but unfortunately for him, he wasn't able to fit it into a soundbyte. I don't even think he tried though. If he had, it would be called...

Bush Admin, get our fucking diplomats round a table with interested parties and start negotiating our ticket home today. Give the Iraqis back their oil, foreswear permanent military bases and if Iran and Syria and others agree not to be asswipes, we'll start redeploying our troops right away and let's call it a good day, considering.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-11-20-clark_x.htm?csp=34



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. I read that article - and the first thing that came to mind
was that they left out an "option" - the Cheney option as in "Go F*** yourself"

8 months ago the Baker-Hamilton group was put together to study Iraq. We've been in Iraq since March 2003.

Fran Lebowitz, at a book award show on C-span, put it like this "do you study for a math test before the day of the test or 3 years afterwards?"

In addition to Baker-Hamilton, bush* started up his own little study group, giving them 1 month to come up with a plan.

Meanwhile - we have the Pentagon coming up with plan options.

I believe Baker-Hamilton has 4 options, Pentagon has 3, and who know how many options the little bush group will produce. I'm sure some of these options overlap.

the only plan currently being implemented by the bushies is "wait to win"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC