Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush slaps miners, decides overtime is overrated:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:33 PM
Original message
Bush slaps miners, decides overtime is overrated:
Edited on Thu Nov-16-06 01:39 PM by FLDem5
Bi-partisanship, my hat. This child is determined to thumb his nose at the world.

Bush Re-Nomination of Stickler, DeCamp Not a Bipartisan Move
by Mike Hall, Nov 15, 2006

Yesterday, with Republicans still holding a majority in the lame duck 109th Congress, Bush resubmitted two nominations that already had failed to win Senate confirmation: Richard Stickler, as head of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), and Paul DeCamp, for administrator of the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division. Stickler is a former coal industry insider and DeCamp is a lawyer who represented Wal-Mart.

<snip>
Stickler’s recess appointment to MSHA was a slap in the face to the families who lost husbands, fathers, brothers and sons in the Sago Mine disaster and other deadly mine incidents this year that have resulted in 45 coal miner deaths, the highest since 1995. Several of the deceased miners’ families have urged Bush not to appoint Stickler because of his safety track record as coal industry executive.

<snip>
In DeCamp’s case, his record includes urging the weakening of the Fair Labor Standard Act’s (FLSA’s) overtime pay and other protections. He even argues for changing the law to prevent millions of workers from becoming eligible for overtime pay. Strangely enough, he also said that it would not be “in the interest” of the workers to obtain overtime eligibility.

<snip>
With Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Robert C. Byrd (D W.Va.) leading the fight against Stickler and Kennedy’s earlier indication that he would use Senate rules to block DeCamp’s appointment, it’s unlikely Bush’s choices will win confirmation in the few days remaining in this Congress.


Give 'em hell, gentlemen.
http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/Pictures/Persons/000228/000228-188094.jpg




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. part of his 'resolve' image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. he sucks. I hate that his promise of bi-partisanship got so much press
but these chop blocks are ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. like everything else - his definition of
bi-partisan is different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush won't be happy till he hands 08 to us too!
This is going to be fun to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. we do have front row seats.
He is trying to pull a Clinton and push everything through a lame duck session, but you have to actually have the backing of your party to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC