|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
survivor999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:06 AM Original message |
Why is it that we still don't know who sent the Anthrax? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubeskin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. Because it was probably a Republican n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
2. Could be no one is looking. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibDemAlways (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. The anthrax was an inside job gone awry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
4. Because it was a republican who was also senior bioweapon specialist ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Agreed, this was not enemy high end stuff. OK'd by someone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:50 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. actually the anthrax mailer is known to the authorities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:55 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I can see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
survivor999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 11:31 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I hope they investigate for real now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twilight_sailing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
6. The Unibomber |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
artemisia1 (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 02:26 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. False Comparison, but Good Point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 02:30 AM Response to Original message |
10. depending on how one defines "we" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC