|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:17 AM Original message |
First bill Dems should send Bush: outlaw his signing statements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. I love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
2. Would that be his 1st veto? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
3. the signing statements are illegal / unconstitutional to begin with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. it would remove all boubt and force public debate on "unitary exec" bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smtpgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
4. I'm for that too, asshole has rescinded almost all of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheney Killed Bambi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
5. Query |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Mods: Move this post to the Metaphysics Forum. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. that's the beauty of it--how could Supreme Court let that stand when.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcctatas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Only if he believes the bill actuall exists..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hong Kong Cavalier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:42 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. And then we could write a bill so Bush couldn't issue a signing statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
7. He'd sign it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. I thought you'd say he'd sign it because he can't read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ringo84 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
8. One thing we can agree on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:42 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. even a lot of righties agree accept for the truly retarded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
9. I agree. Otherwise what's the point of passing any laws? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 01:39 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Yep: bill on body armor would end up paying for Dick Cheney's spare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
17. Pretty good idea, at least for symbolism! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-10-06 12:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC