So you think Andy is famous enough NOW for a Wikipedia entry???

[BlueEyedSon]

I do.

[wakeme2008]

1. I do not go to that Repug Site Wikipedia any more

:shrug:

[SmokingJacket]

2. Repug? Really?

How so?

[wakeme2008]

5. there is a Repug group that delete things like Andy's bio

and Wikipedia allows them to continue to do it.

[Tansy_Gold]

4. Totally -- TOTALLY -- off topic

I know it's in really really bad taste, and I apologize for insulting anyone, but maybe the elephant-on-elephant graphic should have crosses instead of stars??? In honor of Ted Haggard and all.



Tansy Gold, now shutting up

[BlueEyedSon]

6. and the trunk should be snorting a pile of white powder

[babylonsister]

3. Yes, I do. He will always be famous in my book,

especially now. :loveya: :loveya: I hope his family got as big a kick out of seeing him and his good works last night as we did.

[BlueEyedSon]

7. My recollection is that the main complaint of the Andy entry was

that he was inconsequential or unremarkable or whatever an not worth mentioning. I don't think the issues with the entry were on the accuracy of the content.

[Ian David]

8. I AGREE!! n/t

[sqarebis]

9. Yes

do it.

[BlueEyedSon]

10. im not a registered user or editor or whatever

but for someone who has navigated those waters, i think there is now a good case for reinstatement

[BlueEyedSon]

11. kick