|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:36 PM Original message |
Pelosi: "No impeachment" if we win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Counciltucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. DAMMIT!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greeby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's not up to you Nancy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Thank goodness for that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemFromMem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. No need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jawja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. And if * serves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. We can't let it happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 07:25 PM Response to Reply #13 |
54. We'll do everything in our power, but no. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 07:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
51. That's what the Dems thought when they let Reagan+Bush I off the hook. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 07:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
50. Spot On!! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. That Pelosi will be good for the country is more of essence now than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 06:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
40. Impeachment IS Our Positive Agenda! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. How about this... a forced resignation instead!?!?!?!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 06:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
41. Accusing, and being willing to take the action necessary (impeach) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
8. Just campaigning. Her polls probably show that impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 06:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. Actually, since no one is giving voice to the anger and accusing Bush and Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. Of course there will be impeachments of Bush and Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 06:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
43. But when you don't accuse a criminal of crimes you are complicit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yoda Yada (474 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. Let's not cross that bridge until we come to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 06:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
44. the notion that Pelosi is lying for political gain is not very comforting. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turbineguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
11. Smart Play n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 06:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
45. for who? Bush and Cheney? I'm sure they are thrilled to be EXONERATED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
12. Conyers is in charge of the committee. He will decide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benevolent dictator (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
14. Way to convince |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benevolent dictator (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 03:20 AM Response to Reply #27 |
37. OK, so a lot of them aren't "friends" per se, they're just the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sequoia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
15. Maybe she's lying....an old KKKarl trick ya know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 07:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
46. Oh good. "Ends Justify the Means" fascists on both sides now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
16. Well, INVESTIGATIONS come before impeachment. First Things First. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. that is my thought as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 07:04 PM Response to Reply #16 |
47. They know all they need to know -- and failing to accuse Bushcheney of . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greeneyedboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. exactly what she should say now. she has wiggle room for later. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. There ya go. Now, if we do take congress, and we do get the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 07:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
48. There is no rationalization for dereliction of duty. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
turbo_satan (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
19. I, for one, will not be disappointed if... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Me either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 07:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
49. She must to fulfill her Congressional Oath, and ALL Dems will Pay the Price. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
22. Well duh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
23. Pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
24. Smart move on her part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. You have it exactly right. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
25. Pelosi does not control John Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greeneyedboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
26. and perhaps Bush as lame duck albatross wouldn't be so bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
28. Holding her cards. Plenty of info on Bush that the public doesn't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
huskerlaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
29. Not her call. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
30. We don't need to start hearings right away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:42 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Conventional wisdom repeats that she will be the House Leader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:44 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. I'm glad that she won't be the deciding factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
33. if you can't say something that will actually win you votes . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
35. We, the people, will continue to push for impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roamer65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-24-06 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
36. Notice she doesn't say "impeachment of Deadeye Dick"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 04:25 AM Response to Original message |
38. If you read the small print.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Red Right and BLUE (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 05:09 AM Response to Original message |
39. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sir Jeffrey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
52. She never ruled out extradition to The Hague... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donald Ian Rankin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-25-06 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
53. Good for her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC