66% of Americans think the election will be stolen!

[garybeck]

This segment from Lou Dobbs last week is amazing. Not only do they demonstrate how easy it is to steal an election, but about half way through the segment, they release poll results showing that 66% of Americans believe there will be "inaccurate results from electronic voting machines caused on purpose by hackers." Other poll questions show a majority of people simply do not trust the machines. AND RIGHTFULLY SO.

my comment - we need to start differentiating between "hackers" and "riggers" but this segment is great and it shows that people are starting to wake up. the question now is, what are we going to do about it???






http://www.solarbus.org/blog/index.shtml#061023.dobbs

[greeneyedboy]

1. "inaccurate results" != successfully "stolen". w/ a high margin of victory

none of the standard dirty tricks will work.

[porphyrian]

2. The gop hopes it will blow up on us.

There's a good chance we will sweep this election, barring any hoo-hah in the next two weeks. When that happens, they can then claim the elections were stolen from them. We must do everything we can to make sure we aren't the ones caught tampering.

[garybeck]

3. Nooooo! It's the other way around!

the concern is that the GOP will maintain control because of election fraud! Not that the Dems will win and the Reps will accuse them of it?!?!?!?

[porphyrian]

7. There is too much spotlight to risk fraud this time.

If two thirds of Americans are already convinced the elections are tampered with two weeks before an election where the republican hold on state and local government is seriously endangered, likely with a broad margin in most cases, they would have to be stupid to use direct tampering to win, and they're not (at least, not the ones planning the strategy). Instead, they'll point to the massive change in direction of votes and say that it's too extreme not to be tampering by the Democrats, and they'll point to anything shady anyone remotely connected to us and the elections do and blast it all over the media as proof, thus it would blow up in our face. We have to make sure they fail when they do this.

[garybeck]

9. I don't buy it...

the polls show the Dems winning. It's when the polls are different from the results that poeple suspect a problem. I don't think the Repubs will try something stupid like that.

[greeneyedboy]

31. i agree. esp. if we keep K'ing butt in the GOTV ground game.

[joeunderdog]

47. Ya mean like the 1-day15-point Max Cleeland swing in 2000? NAHHH!

[Stand and Fight]

40. Not if they have the National Guard to put down disquiet. n/t

[Jack Rabbit]

4. Get ready, get set . . .

Kiev, 2005
Photo: Ukrainian Embassy, Belgium

[bdamomma]

52. I only wish we get to that day!!!!!!!!!!!

[rinsd]

5. A Lou Dobbs poll or a real poll?

Because the results are useless if its the former.

[garybeck]

8. it is a CNN poll, not a Lou Dobbs poll. n/t

[rinsd]

10. But online or like a CNN/Gallup poll...

[garybeck]

27. it says margin of error is 4.5% which indicates it is

a scientific poll, not an online poll.

[rinsd]

37. Thanks (nt)

[bullimiami]

6. i guess 2/3 of americans arent as stupid as they think we are.

[Benhurst]

11. Recommended #3

[Warpy]

12. Just make damned sure they know

who the thieves are, that racketeering organization known as the RNC.

[ComerPerro]

13. Dobbs probably has some convinced that it will be Dems hacking the vote

he has the RWers terrified that Chavez will steal the elections away from the GOP

[helderheid]

15. If the powers that be allow us to "win" this election, Dems need to

work their asses off to get rid of these machines.

[Norquist Nemesis]

22. Absolutely!

If the Dems win and take back either House, I have no doubt the Cons' lawyers all have their papers ready for initiating lawsuits like we've never seen before.

[helderheid]

14. hoooo boy! Rec 4!

[Crankie Avalon]

16. In the Ukraine, they'd take to the streets. In this country...

...we'll just roll over and hope that at least the American Idol vote is on the up-and-up.

I'm afraid most Americans are too passive to do anything.

[garybeck]

30. don't blame the people!!!

in '04 we had more people register and vote than in decades!! people were pissed and we voted Bush out.

the real problem is the media, who reported that it was a clean election. In Ukraine, the media just reported the facts. that's all we need here.

[Stand and Fight]

42. Where do you intend to find this fact-reporting media?

It does NOT exist here. When it happens the media will do nothing but report with a right-wing slant. Like in 2000, 2002, and 2004.

[Stand and Fight]

41. Just like the Germans... Too passive. Too sheepish. n/t

[bdamomma]

54. as long as Americans have their toys they will blindly turn away

until those "toys" are taken away then and only then will people react.

[Norquist Nemesis]

17. Ok, so if the Dems take back Congress by a few seats

will they be saying that it wasn't stolen enough or too little? Is this a setup for Bush to call the election nul and void until final results are investigated (unlike the past two elections?)

Don't get me wrong, I think it's great it's being brought to the fore. I'm just getting worried because any question of the past elections have been waved off as 'conspiracy theory'. Now, suddenly THIS election is in deep jeopardy...but the past two elections we're just supposed to get over it because they won?

[helderheid]

18. I agree - see post 15

[bdamomma]

53. that is exactly what they will say "get over it" and them just

saying that will make my blood boil, we have to get these neo cons scums out.

[bdamomma]

19. they never say by who though? if the dems win the repigs will

say we stole it. This should be clarified.

[helderheid]

21. So long as we get paper ballots!

[ComerPerro]

24. This may sound paranoid, but I have been thinking about it

suppose the machines are hackable at any point on election day.

If exit polling overwhelmingly indicates that a Dem is going to win, what stops them from going into the machine and hacking it (leaving evidence) to make sure the Dem wins by a wide margin.

Then, after the election results, the Repig challenger can protest the results, and then someone will show up with proof that the Dem stole the election.

The Repig gets to go to Congress, the Dem goes to trial and probably jail, and Repigs will be able to say (with hard proof) that Dems steal elections

[helderheid]

29. Well what we do I think is point out that Dems TRIED to pass legislation

for paper ballots and that not ONE republican would co-sponser or support those bills. We also point out 2000-2004. We also (if they allow us to win 2006) pass the laws we tried to pass before and get rid of the %*&@!&! machines!

[Norquist Nemesis]

35. It's making me nervous, too. See #17 what Bush might do. n/t

:tinfoilhat:

[jokerman93]

38. If we see this

Good point. If we begin to see this scenario you describe playing out repeatedly all over, that might be the cue that says the real work now falls to us. We the people are the last line of defence against corporate tyranny in America. The streets and byways of Washington D.C. and every city and town in this country are waiting for us.

What color shall we wear on that day?

J

[bdamomma]

55. RED WHITE AND BLUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Stand and Fight]

43. If that's the case....

We riot in the streets. Enough bullshit and pussy-footing around the issue.

[garybeck]

26. it is clear I think

most americans want the dems to win.

most americans think the election will be stolen.

conclusion: most americans think the REPUBLICANS will steal it from the DEMOCRATS.

I think a lot of people are getting confused for no reason.

[Ksec]

20. In razor close elections

one crooked machine can make the difference.

With the coming midterms and the closeness of these races, one or two machines can make the difference between a repub majority or a Dem majority.

[Norquist Nemesis]

23. Rove strives for simple majorities

It makes it much easier to steal when you have things within the margin of error. It also makes it easier to divide people.

[earth mom]

25. The plan is to TWIST this to the rethug advantage!

Damn them! :grr:

Of course, when the dems "lost" in '00 and '04 it was "conspiracy theory" to say those elections were stolen even when everyone knew they were!

Now, just watch: when the thugs lose the house and senate they will cry foul and say the election was stolen from them! Bastards! Bastards! Bastards! :puke:

[garybeck]

32. Why do you all keep saying this? That is not what is going to happen.

The problem is the Republicans can and possibly will steal the election. Period.

If the dems win, the republicans will not have anything to stand on, saying it was stolen. the results would match the polls. They'll sound like sore losers if they cry foul.

LOOK. when elections are stolen, there are the real results and the false results. the one who steals has to be the one who uses the false results.

the real results will most likely show the dems winning. the only ones who could steal it are the Republicans.

dobbs hates Bush. he is not doing anything to try to convince people that the dems are going to steal it. He is the only one in the mainstream media who is HELPING us by showing the American people there is a problem.

just look at the polls. the majority of people want the dems to win. the majority of people think the election will be stolen. how and why are so many people twisting this backwards and thinking that it's republicans thinking the dems will steal it?

you people who are twisting this whole thing around backwards are seriously losing it!

[earth mom]

45. Of course the dems won't steal it. BUT when they win by a huge margin

that the thugs can't possibly steal, then the thugs will make a case for the election being stolen because they are ruthless and play to win to matter how they get there-look no further than '00 & '04-which the thugs STOLE. The thugs don't care what anyone thinks of them and will quickly utilize the media that they control to get their message out. Just like in '00. To say that those of who understand their m.o. are "losing it" is just a case of shooting the messenger.

[bdamomma]

56. so when we win and if they accuse of us of stealing we can say

to them, GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!!!!! sounds familiar doesn't it?????

[garybeck]

57. they can steal it regardless of the real margin.

don't count your chickens. we had pretty big margins in 04 too and we know that technically the election can be rigged under any circumstances. the real question is whether the media will roll over again, or report the discrepancies.

[stop the bleeding]

28. sounds about 100% right n/t

[pdxmom]

33. Which is exactly why Bush and Rove are so confident about retaining control n/t

[shadowknows69]

34. Isn't this where we should ban all electronic voting machines?

Crazy idea I know, fair elections, call me a dreamer.

[TheBaldyMan]

36. at least that means 2/3 US voters know the election is rigged.

even Republicans that voted for Bush in the last 2 elections have every right to be pissed about that. Especially with Dubya's corporate welfare, big government, massive deficit agenda. Not widely avowed republican virtues.

[Marie26]

39. That's kind of astounding

Combine this w/the polls that 33% of Americans think Bush staged 9/11, and 51% think Bush should be impeached, and there's a serious amount of rage against the Republicans.

[Stand and Fight]

44. Why do you think Bush controls the National Guard now?

Governors have to give over their NG troops if Lil' Bush says he wants them...

[passy]

46. And they will blame the Dems for hacking it.

[farmboxer]

48. Dobbs should say who owns the damned Repub Voting

machines, but he does not. Exit polls? Rigged elections? Bush & Pals are 100% sure of the outcome. However, I think most are ready to react to the rigged elections. Why not money sent for election reform? Repubs don't want it! Dobbs is not telling the whole truth and when he blames Dems along with Repubs, he should point out that it's Repubs who control everything!

Republican manufactured and programmed voting machines are what they really are! Can we hack back?!

[tomreedtoon]

49. Why prettify the word "hacker"?

I know, the term is not well defined. There are techies who believe that "hacking" a system means trying to extend the technology, understand it and make it do new things.

But most people accept a "hacker" as a thief, a con man, a dirty bastard who wants to steal your votes, your ATM card and your web page.

Let's face it; "hacker" is just a modern term for "mad scientist," someone who does what he wants with science with no regard for anyone else. And if this offends anyone out there, there haven't been a lot of self-proclaimed "hackers" that have been recognized for social service or positive, people-helping causes. Most of them work for the satisfaction of getting money from the rich, or of stomping over someone's virtual face because they have the power to.

You want to challenge this judgment, that's okay, but I don't think the public would disagree with me.

[Keepontruking]

50. Stolen Elections

Duh!!!!!!!!!!  we have become no different then any third
world country since Bushie took office ...everthing is
corrupt!!!!!!!!!!!  Circus Girl

[j_gregory1948]

51. they are wrong

the elections won't be stolen, they already HAVE been stolen.