Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, would we have been better off with Harriet Miers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:23 PM
Original message
So, would we have been better off with Harriet Miers?
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 04:24 PM by Quixote1818
Perhaps Dems cozied up to her too quickly and we ended up shooting ourselves in the foot.

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lyle Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. We'd almost be better off with Castro! LoL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. she was a joke. and was most likely anti-abortion too
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 04:40 PM by lionesspriyanka
atleast alito is a legitimate candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. How many of us suppported Harriet Miers?
I know some people warned that the second pick would be much worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I actually thought we should have gone with her because I knew
Bush would do a hard right to make his base happy again. Then again, it's hard to say what Miers would have been like. I thought it was interesting that Reid and others seemed to like her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. you can't blame the Dem's on that
it was the wacko christian right and their obsession with Row vs Wade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. exactly...
...we've nothing to do with Harriet Miers. In that instance, they really weren't looking for a "straight up or down vote". It's all bullshit. Democracy is a sham, and the pResident is a f'n traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Right she was thrown up to give them something to swat at
they swatted. The Republicans spun it as the Dems being against her. The put Alito up - everyone screamed that the Dems couldn't be against TWO in a row just couldn't do it- the Dems had already spent all their political capitol on Meirs. So Alito goes through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. I suspect she would have been easier swayed by others on the
court. I don't think she had a very strong determination, and perhaps Ginsberg and the other Dem appointees would have been able to convince her they were right. I think Alito will cozy up to Scalia and Thomas. Of course this is just a guess, and we'll never know about Harriett.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Neocons sure know how to put up a fight!
She never had a chance with them. They fought harder against her than our people against Roberts and Alito. The most shocking was that Byrd voted for Roberts. Where's the brave fighters anymore? It damn sure isn't any of the two fine democratic senators who will be demanding that we vote for them in 2008 for president so that no right-wing judges can be appointed. They count on because it's so true, Americans have short memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. That was obvious to anyone with half a brain from the start.....
Miers would have been a weak, easily led justice who could conceivably wind up on our side. Instead we get Scalito, the anti-O'Conner. I couldn't understand why people on our side were demanding she withdraw. Some people don't recognize to gift when they receive one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC