Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Bush had not invaded Iraq, where would the "war on terror" be today?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:17 AM
Original message
If Bush had not invaded Iraq, where would the "war on terror" be today?
Would they have captured Osama bin Laden? How many Americans would have died in the war? How many countries would be helping us catch the "terrorists"? Who would be president today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, less than the total now, more than we have helping us now, not * n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. if the bush crime gang wouldn't have invaded Iraq
they never would have invented the "war on terror" and all countries would be catching "terrorists," just as they always have done.

Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. you're talking crazy talk!
but then oil would probably be around $30/bbl. instead of $68/bbl. how can domestic oil companies be expected to survive on puny 20% profit growth?? america NEED texaco to have 250% profit growth. if you disagree, why don't you just save the government a lot of trouble and check yourself into gitmo right now, buddy!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. if the scotus had not installed * in the wh where would we be today
What a different scenario that would be. Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FightingIrish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. That thought hit me last night. Bush needed the war.
Edited on Wed Jan-25-06 10:30 AM by FightingIrish
Afghanistan had gone too well and was in danger of not being a real war much longer. Catching or killing Bin Laden would have worked against the real aims of the administration. The war on terror wasn't the sexy kind of war that you could dress up and play soldier in. Bush needed the war in Iraq and he got it. 9-11 changed everything but the war in Iraq was his free pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. And Rumsfeld said they ran out of targets in Afghanistan..
they had bombed all the rocks and tunnels in the country. Nothing was left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Poor Rummy.... nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. On Page 12
bin Laden probably would have died a natural death, few of our people would have died in the war on terror, and all countries would be helping. AND, "The George" would have been relegated back to his playroom to assume the role of commander in chief and spend his remaining days leading his wooden soldiers into combat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. A lot more contained and focused
Instead of it becoming a major geopolitical "war" between "us and them" it would have been what it should have been all along. A unified international ongoing police action focised against a dangerous group of fanatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. More funding would have been made available for what really matters
Securing the borders, cargo inspections, and a functional National Guard in place for more effective domestic security. The Iraq War is pouring money -- correction, pouring borrowed Chinese money -- down a rathole, with nothing to show in the way of improved security except for the bill coming due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michiganbuckeye1970 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. back page to the rest of the crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogbison Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Welcome, MichiganBuckeye1970!
Glad to have you here....

:hi: :hi: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. Why in the world would they WANT to capture...
...the USA's greatest intelligence asset?

Emmanuel Bin-Goldstein is the best thing to happen to the RePIGlican thought-drain machine since the Reagan-Poindexter-Negroponte "Axis of Evil."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC