Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

James Baker III on "Fresh Air" today, stops just short of admitting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:26 PM
Original message
James Baker III on "Fresh Air" today, stops just short of admitting
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 07:26 PM by smoogatz
that Bushco invaded Iraq for the oil. Listen here: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6202342 The key moment is about 4/5 of the way through the interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. As long as no one's accounting for Iraqi oil revenue, is there any doubt?
Few people are asking what's happening to oil revenues derived from Iraq, and fewer are interested in telling us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. A testimony to how corrupt this country is
How is Baker, a guy with a long list of criminal activity, allowed to walk free? Forget about Dubya this is a real power broker who's got more blood on his hands than Dubya could dream of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. He said that Desert Storm was about oil...
and GWH Bush said as much, too. Saddam invaded Kuwait for their oil, and we kicked them out for the same reason.

As far as this mess is concerned, he really didn't say that it was over oil. Baker (as an advisor to Ford, Reagan, or Bush41)would have attacked Saddam if Iraq's oil became insecure, securing the energy would a justifiable reason for invasion. Considering what a phenomenal disaster Iraq is right now, my feeling is that Baker is being brought in to once again secure Iraq's oil. If Shrub invaded Iraq for their oil, it totally backfired. Come to think of it, no matter what reason you might list for the invasion, it failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Googling 'James Baker' 'Energy Security' gets some interesting hits
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 11:39 PM by ProgressiveEconomist
On the first page (at http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22James+Baker%22+%22Energy+Security%22&btnG=Google+Search ) is a piece with references to an April 2001 report financed by the Baker Institute for Public Policy that may have been very influential in a secret "blood for oil" WH agenda.

Also, I was surprised to see in "State of Denial" an account of a November 2001 meeting, dominated by the American Enterprise Institute, which even more directly advocated invading Iraq.

It amazes me that people like Jim Baker and Fareed Zakaria evidently may wage a high-level politics that results in tens of thousands of deaths of human beings, with no public accountability. Don't forget that the "Voter ID" law which has been enacted by the House to disfranchise hundreds of thousands also is Baker's idea, foisted on Congress by the Carter-Baker Commission

.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=james_baker :

"April 12, 2001: Report on Energy Security Argues US Needs to Review Policy on Iraq

A report commissioned by former US Secretary of State James Baker and the Council on Foreign Relations, titled 'Strategic Energy Policy Challenges For The 21st Century,' is completed and submitted to Vice President Dick Cheney. The report was drafted by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Edward L. Morse, an energy industry analyst, chaired the project, and Amy Myers Jaffe was the project¡s director. The paper urges the US to formulate a comprehensive, integrated strategic energy policy to address the current energy crisis, which it attributes to infrastructural restraints, rapid global economic expansion, and the presence of obstacles to foreign investment in the oil-rich Middle East. ...

One of the report's recommendations is to '(r)eview policies toward Iraq' with the ultimate goal of stemming the tide of anti-Americanism in the Middle-East and 'eas(ing) Iraqi oil-field investment restrictions.' Iraq, under the leadership of Saddam Hussein, remains a 'destabilizing influence ... to the flow of oil to international markets from the Middle East.' It also notes, 'Saddam Hussein has also demonstrated a willingness to threaten to use the oil weapon and to use his own export program to manipulate oil markets.' Therefore, the report says, the United States should conduct an immediate policy review toward Iraq, including military, energy, economic, and political/diplomatic assessments' and work with key allies to develop a new integrated strategy toward Iraq. Key elements of the new policy should include narrowing the focus of sanctions and using diplomatic means to enforce existing UN resolutions. (Sunday Herald (Glasgow), 10/5/2002; Sydney Morning Herald, 12/26/2002"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. I didn't know Senator Palpatine gave interviews
And who's he training to be the next Sith Lord?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good question. I bet they keep that info quiet until his unvealing.
That's just good marketing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC