Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice initially refused to testify before 9/11 Commission. Now we know why

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:53 PM
Original message
Rice initially refused to testify before 9/11 Commission. Now we know why
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-03-23-911-rice-usat_x.htm

TextCommissioner Tim Roemer, a former Democratic congressman, held up a new book, Against All Enemies, that accuses Bush and his aides of ignoring warnings of the threat posed by al-Qaeda. The author, Richard Clarke, who was in charge of counterterrorism for Bush and President Clinton, has been discussing his charges in TV interviews.

Roemer said the discussion "belongs not on the airwaves" but before the commission.

"I hope Dr. Rice will reconsider and come before the commission for the sake of the American people," he said.

The audience at Tuesday's hearing included many people who lost family members in the attacks in 2001. They applauded each time commissioners criticized Rice's decision not to appear and testify under oath.


http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/features/jan-june04/rice_4-07.html

Rice is expected to challenge claims made by former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke in his recent book "Against All Enemies: Inside America's War On Terror" and in his testimony before the panel last month.

Reading and Discussion Questions
Clarke said the Bush administration did not take seriously enough the possibility terrorists might attack, choosing instead to focus on more traditional threats like long-range missiles in countries like Russia and China. ...

Members of the Bush administration -- including Rice -- spent the past several weeks trying to discredit much of what Clarke said on and before his official testimony.

"Before Sept. 11, we closely monitored threats to our nation. President Bush revived the practice of meeting with the director of the CIA every day -- meetings that I attended. And I personally met with George Tenet regularly and frequently reviewed aspects of the counterterror effort," Rice wrote in an editorial in The Washington Post.


And here is an excerpt from Condi's self-serving defensive editorial. Please note her incredible statements: No al Qaeda plan was turned over to the new administration ... I personally met with George Tenet regularly and frequently reviewed aspects of the counterterror effort.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A13881-2004Mar21?language=printer

The al Qaeda terrorist network posed a threat to the United States for almost a decade before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Throughout that period -- during the eight years of the Clinton administration and the first eight months of the Bush administration prior to Sept. 11 -- the U.S. government worked hard to counter the al Qaeda threat.

During the transition, President-elect Bush's national security team was briefed on the Clinton administration's efforts to deal with al Qaeda. The seriousness of the threat was well understood by the president and his national security principals. In response to my request for a presidential initiative, the counterterrorism team, which we had held over from the Clinton administration, suggested several ideas, some of which had been around since 1998 but had not been adopted. No al Qaeda plan was turned over to the new administration.

...

Before Sept. 11, we closely monitored threats to our nation. President Bush revived the practice of meeting with the director of the CIA every day -- meetings that I attended. And I personally met with George Tenet regularly and frequently reviewed aspects of the counterterror effort.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. She must have heard about another good Macy's shoe sale
When we can dump these people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Her editorial directly contradicts the facts that are coming out.
Woodward sure threw a sh*t bomb into the bush administration's outhouse of lies, didn't he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dr. Rice may be in hot water
Jetting around between Ireland and the Middle East in search of the perfect pair of shoes, Dr. Rice has denied recalling any kind of meeting with Tenet. Now, however, the calendars of the principals have been examined and god damn if it doesn't turn out that Tenet and Rice had a meeting after all. On . . . wait for it . . . July 10, 2001.

Oopsie.

Your move, Dr. Rice. We'll give you a minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. maybe? Willbe!
She is in hot water but who is going to do anything about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for the review...and there's so much more to be revisited now.
K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. She's been trying to have it all different ways.
She wants everyone to believe she was on top of the situation, but yet at the same time she wants everyone to believe that she didn't remember this particular meeting with Tenet, but then when that cover is blown, she wants everyone to believe that Tenet didn't stress the urgency.

She's a bad liar. I think she is the perfect representation for your sig line. At least I hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Then Bush/Cheney ordered Rice to testify because it made them look bad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC