Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hassert: Didn't READ vs didn't KNOW. Republican double-speak never

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:26 PM
Original message
Hassert: Didn't READ vs didn't KNOW. Republican double-speak never
ceases to amaze me. I almost admire them in a sicking sort of way. I was dying to see how they would spin this.

Hassart: "I didn't READ e-mails (NOT that he didn't KNOW about them) - pretty clever, I must say.

Also, notice ALL the MSM is saying something along the line of Democrats are wanting to jump on this for political reasons. According to them, the problem is Democrats wanting to USE the information - NOT that it happened - just that Democrats want to USE it.

And of course according to Hassart, the problem is WHO leaked the information - NOT that the information is terrible.

Repulsive, repulsive, repulsive Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Denny = The L word
ttp://editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003189478&imw=Y

UPDATE: Foley Scandal Spreads, After GOP Leader Calls 'Wash Post' to Change Story

snip

The Washington Post carried this remarkable passage today: "House Majority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) told The Washington Post last night that he had learned this spring of inappropriate 'contact' between Foley and a 16-year-old page. Boehner said he then told House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.)

"Boehner later contacted The Post and said he could not remember whether he talked to Hastert.

snip

On Friday, Rep. John Shimkus, R-Ill., chairman of the Page Board that oversees the congressional work-study program for high schoolers, said he did investigate but Foley falsely assured him he was only mentoring the boy. Pages are high school students who attend classes under congressional supervision and work as messengers.

Just as Shimkus' explanation was released, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California proposed to the House that its ethics committee investigate and make a preliminary report in 10 days. She demanded to know who knew of the messages, whether Foley had other contacts with pages and when the Republican leadership was notified of Foley's conduct.

Instead, majority Republicans engineered a vote to allow the ethics panel to decide whether there should even be an investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hope Karma is a bitch and these bastards some day get what
they really deserve.
Fuckers!!
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I watched part of his comments, I believe he said "none of the
leadership had seen the emails before Friday". (Not that it's much different, you're right he
didn't say "know about" them.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That' worse. I guess if he's going to spin, he might as well spin big
time :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder what he would say under oath?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. So funny -
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 01:34 PM by libhill
not what happened, but watching these shit sucking Repuke hypocrites scramble to cover their assess. Probably the same bunch who ragged on Clinton for getting a B.J. I hope the voters throw these bastards out on their sorry asses in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. If a Democrat had done this -
it would be on the front page of every news paper 'till the end of the decade....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, Fat Bastard Denny was VERY careful...
Yes, Fat Bastard Denny was VERY careful to READ every word in a carefully prepared statement, and then run off immediately afterward to avoid ANY unscripted comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. The standard GOP excuse for all occasions.
"I was out of the loop."
"I wasn't informed."
or some variation there of.

Condi's using it today too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's Hastert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's really ironic -
that for a party who claim to hate gays, there are so many gays in the Republican Party...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC