|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:13 PM Original message |
MSNBC reports that Republicans are blaming Foley leak on Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
1. First off, how is that a leak? And Second, even if they did, so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Anyone who had such information and witheld it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. If that's the case, the Repigs are more guilty than Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. True....But the backstory has to be cleared up soon to deflect this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prisoner_Number_Six (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
48. Doesn't witholding evidence actually boil down to accessory? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NRaleighLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. That's right - "Pay no attention to the truth....just our spin"...argggh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. who controls congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. Who cares WHO leaked it? The behavior is repellent and needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadow 99 (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. It already has in some respects. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
45. "the gays"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:55 PM Original message |
so, it's all about gays? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. The DEMS deliberately held the info? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abluelady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
8. I Hope The Dems Leaked It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. The problem would be the timing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abluelady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 02:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
55. Being A Good Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:17 PM Original message |
Reminds me of their Abu Ghraib "outrage" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libby2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
9. I hope they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDem06 (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
10. So at lunch today I was told that the group that broke the news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. LOL, so let me get this straight.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDem06 (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. The guy is a co-worker... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 02:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
52. That explains it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #25 |
46. What is CREW? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 02:06 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. CREW is the acronym for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 02:04 PM Response to Reply #25 |
53. Crew sent it to the FBI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
47. "the group that broke the news" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
11. Leak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
12. Also never heard of Foley warnings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
13. So, they think NO ONE should have investigated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yes, it was the Democrat on the page investigation committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
15. I read that this info was turned over to the FBI in JULY n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
40. Yes, CREW turned the e-mails over to the FBI immediately upon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
16. Who gives a fugg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
17. Hastert, in his appearance today also was, in essence, trying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
34. Yeah, did you hear the last question as Hastert fled the room? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Yep, they reminded me of cockroaches skittering away when the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
20. Not gonna work - Dems aren't IN CHARGE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
21. Good! someone had to report that pedophile. Fat ass Hastert wasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LunaC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
22. If the Pugs addressed the problem when they first learned about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
23. What EXACTLY is their objection? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sensitivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
24. CARVILE-BEGALLA WAR ROOM have files on all the Puke Pedofiles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
27. they are a desperate bunch aren't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pachamama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
28. LET THEM BLAME THE DEMOCRATS! And the Dems should answer back that they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Double T (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
29. Now corporate america (GE) through msnbc is blaming the Dems.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
30. Blaming the Dems? For what? Exposing a perv in their party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
31. A LEAK?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:34 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. It depends on the timing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
npincus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
32. Repubs are DEFENDING the right to keep pedophilia a secret? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
35. Here's the perfect answer for this BS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
37. Hastert is a Democrat? Who knew! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
39. And so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
41. Them boys were all democrat plants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
42. so, it's not about the action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
43. Bwahahahaha, "they leaked our secrets about a perv" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
44. If it had been left up to the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
49. Ok, this is one of those times when the average American's short attention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
50. the GOP leadership could have done something months ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Yossarian Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
51. Gee! There's a real surprise! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
56. then they ought to be thanking democrats for foley's ouster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
57. How did emails forwarded to a Republican house member's office get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Homer Wells (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
58. These Repukes are so locked into the dirty tricks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TallahasseeGrannie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-02-06 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
59. If that is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC