Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So how is Faux covering the Foley scandal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 05:55 PM
Original message
So how is Faux covering the Foley scandal?
I would think that they would be torn between serving two masters. On one hand they would want to protect Repukes at all costs. On the other hand they get a collective boner from stories about deviant sex.

How are they handling it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. you don't want to know

where they've got their hands on this one.... :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Their not trying to blame this on the Blue dress are they? It's a wonder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't know about Fux News (I try not to watch) . . .
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 06:03 PM by MrModerate
But the talking points I've heard have been "at least when 'Licans are caught, they have the decency to resign -- unlike Bill Clinton, Barney Franks, and Gerry Studds."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. What scandal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think he's referring to the Democratic conspiracy to entrap
and bring down another upstanding R politician - just another in a long line of D smear-jobs and dirty tricks... :crazy: </faux>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I was kidding, making a guess as to Faux's response, but thanks
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh, I got it - and your scenario is a likely one...
I just thought I'd offer an alternative, and your post was a good opening!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Republicans Offer Explanations in Wake of Foley's E-Mail Scandal With Teen
At the Capitol, Republicans spent the night trying to explain how this could have happened on their watch.

Among the explanations during the night:

— The congressional sponsor of the page, Rep. Rodney Alexander, R-La., said he was asked by the youth's parents not to pursue the matter, so he dropped it.

— Alexander said that before deciding to end his involvement, he passed on what he knew to the chairman of the House Republican campaign organization, Rep. Thomas Reynolds, R-N.Y. Reynolds' spokesman, Carl Forti, said the campaign chairman also took no action in deference to the parents' wishes.

— Rep. John Shimkus, R-Ill., chairman of the Page Board that oversees the congressional work-study program for high schoolers, said he did investigate but Foley falsely assured him he was only mentoring the boy. Pages are high school students who attend classes under congressional supervision and work as messengers.

— The spokesman for Speaker Dennis Hastert, Ron Bonjean, said the top House Republican had not known about the allegations. Shimkus said he learned about them in late 2005.

Just as Shimkus' explanation was released, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California proposed to the House that its ethics committee investigate and make a preliminary report in 10 days. She demanded to know who knew of the messages, whether Foley had other contacts with pages and when the Republican leadership was notified of Foley's conduct.

Instead, majority Republicans engineered a vote to allow the ethics panel to decide whether there should even be an investigation.

Hastert said Friday he had asked Shimkus to investigate the page system. "We want to make sure that all our pages are safe and the page system is safe," Hastert said.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,216846,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. aren't their laws against this? (even if parents do not want involvement)



...— The congressional sponsor of the page, Rep. Rodney Alexander, R-La., said he was asked by the youth's parents not to pursue the matter, so he dropped it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fox just covered it in depth.
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 06:16 PM by kansasblue
seemed ok. Fox mentioned many in congress knew. Mentioned 2005 dates. Said it was with a male page. Said the discussion concerned masturbation and more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nradisic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can't hear you....
lalalalalalalalala......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC