Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They still could have fixed Iraq after breaking it...(must read)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:43 AM
Original message
They still could have fixed Iraq after breaking it...(must read)
We've made three tragic decisions," Garner told Rumsfeld at their meeting.

"Really?" Rumsfeld said.

"Three terrible mistakes," Garner said.

He cited the first two orders Bremer signed when he arrived, the first banning as many as 50,000 members of Saddam Hussein's Baath Party from government jobs and the second disbanding the Iraqi military. Now there were hundreds of thousands of disorganized, unemployed, armed Iraqis running around.

Third, Garner said, Bremer had summarily dismissed an interim Iraqi leadership group that had been eager to help the United States administer the country in the short term. "Jerry Bremer can't be the face of the government to the Iraqi people. You've got to have an Iraqi face for the Iraqi people," he said.

Garner made his final point: "There's still time to rectify this. There's still time to turn it around."

Rumsfeld looked at Garner for a moment with his take-no-prisoners gaze. "Well," he said, "I don't think there is anything we can do, because we are where we are."

He thinks I've lost it, Garner thought. He thinks I'm absolutely wrong. Garner didn't want it to sound like sour grapes, but facts were facts. "They're all reversible," Garner said again.

"We're not going to go back," Rumsfeld said emphatically


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/30/AR2006093000293.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. SHAMEFUL that this buffoon is still the secretary of war
How dare he resign to notion that Iraq can't be fixed, yet not resign his post as the secretary of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. No surprise
I can't wait until they're dragged out in chains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. With 340 Billion+ spent one would think they all had running water?
electricity for more then 5-7 hours daily
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. NO! They could NOT have fixed Iraq after breaking IT because.......
this 'war' was NEVER about doing what was right for Iraq, ONLY what was right for bushco and their political aspirations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Amen.
The war was lost before it began.

These people have the foresight of gnats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. This implies there ever was any intention to fix Iraq.
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 11:59 AM by glitch
When will they ever admit that the neocons moved on Iraq to loot (and the dimmer ones wanted to prove that looting is sound economic policy).

Edit: Ha! Woodward again, carrying water. Sorry Bob, plausible deniability and claims of incompetence may've worked for Reagan/Bush but most of us are a little wiser now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Garner and the neoconservatives
I remember all the negative press he got when appointed (irregularities in his comapany's government contracts; big supporter of Israel who was going to force recognition of the Jewish state down the throats of Iraqis; Christian fundamentalist). Garner won me over when he showed that he wasn't taking the neoconservative party line. "It is better that they do it for themselves imperfectly than we do it for them perfectly," he said of building the post-Saddam Iraq. "It's their country," he said, and pointed added the rejoinder, "and their oil."

A sovereign Iraq is not what the neoconservatives had in mind at all. Whatever hint the neoconservatives gave Garner not to take their lies at face value, Garner missed. When the neoconservatives said "democracy", Garner thought they menat democracy. That was his downfall.

The neoconservatives broke Iraq and do not want it fixed. A broken Iraq is dependent on the US government, itself no longer responsible to Americans or to its most fundamental laws. A fixed Iraq with a parliament responsible to the Iraqi people would make its second order of business -- after bringing order to the country -- repealing the hundred decrees that Jerry Bremer imposed on Iraq while he was the colonial governor-general and then write their own arrangment for foreign investment in Iraq's economy. Then they would tell the US government "Mission accomplished, thank you; please go home."

Rumsfeld isn't incompetent. He's crooked. He knows very well what this war is about and it wasn't about WMDs (and remeber how he knew where they were?) or anything else related to national security. His bubling failures are his greatest successes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Very well said!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC