Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP's rendition/torture strategy similar to others throughout history

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 01:40 PM
Original message
GOP's rendition/torture strategy similar to others throughout history
Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel considered the secret abduction and rendition to Germany of suspected Resistance members -- known as the Nacht und Nebel (Night and Fog) Decree -- to be the worst order issued by Adolf Hitler for the Western-occupied territories of the Third Reich during World War II.

But the Fuehrer thought it would be effective in deterring sabotage, which often claimed innocent civilian lives, as well as those of German soldiers, officers and civilian occupation officials. So he decreed that, with the exception of those cases where guilt could be established beyond a doubt, presumably through torture, anyone arrested on suspicion of "endangering German security" was to be transferred to Germany under "cover of night."

"(T)he prisoners are to be transported to Germany secretly...," according to the directive issued by Keitel, then chief of the German High Command, in February 1942. "These measures will have a deterrent effect because (a) the prisoners will vanish without leaving a trace, (and) (b) no information may be given as to their whereabouts or their fate."

"Effective intimidation," Keitel, who would be executed for war crimes in 1946, had written in an earlier directive, "can only be achieved either by capital punishment or by measures by which the relatives of the criminal and the population do not know his fate."

...

"Operation Condor."

The operation, which was conceived and effectively headed by Chilean President Augusto Pinochet, brought together the intelligence agencies of Argentina, Paraguay, Bolivia and Uruguay, as well as Pinochet's own secret police chief, Manuel Contreras, in 1975. Although not a charter member, Brazil also participated.

Its purpose was to "enhance communications among each other and integrate tactical operations in tracking down, secretly detaining,
torturing, and terminating (the lives of) critics or suspected militants, who were often referred to as 'terrorists,'" according to Peter Kornbluh, a senior analyst at the Washington-based National Security Archive (NSA).

"Agents from one nation would fly to another to participate in brutal interrogations at secret detention centers," Kornbluh wrote last week in the Chilean newspaper Siete. "Often the Condor victim would be secretly rendered back to his country of origin to another secret torture camp for further interrogation before being killed." As in occupied France, families would never be informed.

"The terrorist problem is general to the entire Southern Cone," Argentina's foreign minister, Adm. Cesar Gazetti, told then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in 1976, according to a secret U.S. document obtained by the NSA four years ago. "To combat
it, we are encouraging joint efforts to integrate with our neighbors."

...

Even some techniques are common, Kornbluh wrote in Siete. "Condor victims were submitted to what their Southern Cone torturers called 'the wet submarine,' while President George W. Bush has reportedly authorized 'waterboarding,' the CIA equivalent."

http://ins.onlinedemocracy.ca/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6460
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. The phrase "It seemed like a good idea at the time"
applies to all of bush's policy decisions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just another parallel between Nazis and Neocons. It is astounding
how many practices right out of Hitler's strategy guide that the Neocons use. It is even more surprising that people fall for them still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. reminds me a bit of the guy this is talking about too-


He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good...

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands....

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers....

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power....

For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:


now why would those words ring a bell? any 5th graders in the house?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. What leaders have done to'save the state' is really some thing.
I think I will cry if I hear any one say 'I have not done anything' so these laws must be OK. Why can they not see it is who is in control of the law that is the scary part. Even in the late 1800 Bismarck used laws to shut down papers that said things he did not like. It is almost as if these people pick the problem up in the middle and not the start of it. One can under stand grabbing a man who has TNT with him but not the man walking down the street that said hi to that man. We are at the stage of picking up the man who said hi and taking all his rights away. This is what many countries do and we fuss about. We are back to the Red stuff where one can not even study the bad guys as it may mean you are with them. I have lived this before I am sure. The Reds are now Terrorist and we must hide under the beds. One crazy world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes. We have traded in our system of justice for that of
Hitler, Stalin or Pinochet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC