|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:28 PM Original message |
What *should* have been the lead story today, were it not for the Torture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. I noticed and I would repost this late Friday when the lava cools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Good advice. I'll check back tomorrow evening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Fri Sep-29-06 06:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. I think the American people have made up their mind & |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. So many fronts, so little time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Fri Sep-29-06 06:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. Has any one seen the pics of Rumsfeld over on Yahoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Iced tea, laptop, should never meet like that..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly
![]() |
Fri Sep-29-06 06:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. Fortunately your laptop is more durable than Bushco policy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. yeah also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. For the second time this week, I must ask "WHO???" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Here you go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Oh, by now I've heard who T.O. is...still don't care who he is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Nor I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Jackie Jack = Jack Abramoff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Ah, thank you...I thought perhaps Jackie Jack was some American Idol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. lol yeah-I am totally out of the pop culture loop too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. He made a MOVIE!?!! Tell me he wasn't In Front of the camera... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 10:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. lol no-thank God! Abramoff the auteur |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 10:04 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I have only one comment on all that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 10:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. LOL...and don't miss the bit about it being funded by white supremacists! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcscajun
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 10:06 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Who else? I can't imagine any cineaste fronting big cash for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 10:07 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. good point/nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. It should be obvious by now, zombies are indifferent to nails in coffins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
12. I think you have to run a stake through the heart not a nail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 10:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Makes me think of Indiana Jones with his gun and the knife guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
troubleinwinter
![]() |
Thu Sep-28-06 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
22. Not a problem. Congress can just retroactively make GOP graft legal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Dec 09th 2019, 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC