|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:27 AM Original message |
I don't think Roe vs Wade will be overturned if Alito is confirmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. Roe Will Only Be The Beginning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I think it would be The End |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cally (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
2. Well, Grover Norquist says that Alito will absolutely overturn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. Agreed. They don't really want to get rid of their main wedge issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:33 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. That's right. They'd lose one of their main weapons against us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
5. Access to abortion is going to be the very least of our problems if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:50 AM Response to Reply #5 |
23. Yes. I'm more concerned with the bigger picture... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
6. Lots of Luck, Then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ret5hd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
7. it will bee a slow erosion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. I think you're right. They can't afford to lose it as a campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
8. I think it will be overturned and left to the states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
9. I think it will be overturned, and then watch things happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reality based (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
10. Do not underestimate the folly and shameless audacity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
12. while they may be stupid and do this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calico1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:36 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Well, if they succeed in rigging every election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:47 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. That's the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demgurl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
13. You forget that they do not have to overturn it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mazzarro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
15. This is totally wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chef (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
16. Roe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
17. I think Bush wants someone who will enhance pres. power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
18. Your assumption is that democracy will continue to play a roll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
21. I tend to agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:49 AM Response to Original message |
22. Roe V Wade is still 5-4 in our favor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hong Kong Cavalier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
24. That's under the assumption that if Roe vs Wade is overturned... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBaldyMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
25. well the MSM would never stir up a smokescreen to distract |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michiganbuckeye1970 (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
26. Other issues are of a worry, as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
27. Ten years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
28. Who needs Roe v. Wade... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philosophie_en_rose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-24-06 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
29. They don't need to overturn Roe to limit abortion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC