Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Take the Ecological Footprint quiz

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:55 PM
Original message
Take the Ecological Footprint quiz
It's pretty sobering. I buy local as much as I can, drive a hybrid, use my bicycle for local errands, try to conserve electricty at home and my lifestyle would still require almost 4 Earths if eveyrone lived like me.

I need to do more.

http://www.earthday.org/footprint/index.asp#

Some background on the concept can be found here:
http://www.footprintnetwork.org/gfn_sub.php?content=footprint_overview

and

http://www.rprogress.org/newprojects/ecolFoot.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow.....3.4 Earths for me...
...although my footprint is 15 and the average is 24....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. ditto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. I had done this before
but I went back to refresh my memory. I'm glad to say I came in with a good result of 10. I wish I could do better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. 12
2.4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cool. I'm Below Average. Still Need 4.6 Planets Though LOL


CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 5.9
MOBILITY 4
SHELTER 3.7
GOODS/SERVICES 6.9

TOTAL FOOTPRINT 20



IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.

WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.



IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 4.6 PLANETS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. 2.6 Earths for me.
My score was an 11, primarily aided by the fact that I rarely fly, don't commute, and live in a heavily agricultural area which permits me to buy most of my food locally.

I was suprised to see that the average score in the US is 24. I had no idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Flying it what hurt me I think
I travel a lot for my job. When I'm home I don't have to commute very often and my office is very close by but I often have to fly to clients. So unfortunatley the biggest problem for me isn't exactly easy to change without changing careers.

Luckly even though I live in an urban area there are good options for regional if not exactly local (though there is some) food.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laundry_queen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. 2.6 for me too.
I think some of the questions are vague (we eat meat but buy organic from a local farmer every year). What helped me was I don't commute and I don't fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. 2.8
But the test is somewhat vague and does not differentiate between sources of electricity. Nor does it ask about heat sources.

"less" garbage than average? For the area? What does that mean?

Not a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. 3.5 planets
I love this site.

I got 5 planets last year when I took it living in the UK with my ex. When I first moved back to Texas and was living with my mom I got like 8 planets. My dad, also in Texas and a stereotypical American, got 14 planets.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. 2.8 for me
, but the test is biased against anyone that hasta fly or lives rural and drives. for instance, i'm not there yet, but i'm moving towards a diesel vehicle i'll run on reclaimed veg oil.. that essentially would be a zero emission vehicle but it would not be reflected in the quiz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. I thought I'd try something out...
after doing my own and coming out at 3.5, I put in what I believe to be the most environmentally friendly answers.

So living with 7 people in a 500 square foot house of Green design without electricity, not traveling at all by any means other than foot or bicycle power, it takes 1 planet to sustain me. Given the fact that this is true of almost no one in a developed country, and even many people in less developed countries this would mean that the planet is not even close to being able to sustain the current population, let alone allowing for population increases. Is it just me or does this quiz seem to be missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Actually, you're missing something.
It's not that it takes 1 Earth to sustain you, it's that one Earth could sustain everyone if we ALL lived like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. That was why I was asking...
If everyone lived like that, the earth would just be able to sustain everyone. Clearly though, a very large percentage of the people on earth do not live like this and take up more resources than the example I gave. If this is the case, you would expect the earth to be well over it's carrying capacity, and although there is some debate as to that, the earth doesn't seem to be so far over it's capacity as this survey would seem to indicate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Your location affects the result as well
A 500 sqft Green House in the US is different from the hut in sub-sahara Africa in terms of the resources required to build and maintain it and how the materials got to the location of your house.

Plus it apparently plugs in average rates of usage and pollutant production to fill in the blanks between the general information you provide it based on national per capita averages.

And it may very well be that we are 2 or 3 times over the Earth's steady state carrying capacity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Good call.
The same house and situation in Nigeria or India, (for example), takes up far less resources than in the US. Most of this difference is in the "food" category, so maybe it's related to the equipment used for agriculture in the US vs. some other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I don't think the quiz is missing something
what is the carrying capacity of the planet? There is much speculation about that.

And as the Xithras remember it is Everyone lived the profile you put in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. 2.6 for me.
Not driving has a lot to do with that I think. I walk and take public transportation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeggieTart Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Eeek. 17 acres.
Another problem is I fly less than 10 hours a year but more than 3. Also, my efficiency apartment is just over 500 square feet. If I say it's under 500 feet, I cut my footprint in half. But I am vegan, so that helps somewhat. I am bad in that I eat way too much packaged food and produce from far away. I very rarely travel by car (I ride buses mostly), so that helps. I don't know if my apartment has energy conservation, although I have replaced one of my bulbs with fluorescent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. So shoot me, 41 footprint 9.2 planets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeggieTart Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Holy shit, are you on Atkins or what?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. actually more strict than Atkins
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 12:25 PM by RGBolen
Pretty much meat and vegetables. But also wife and I are in a large apartment. I drive an older SUV and work outside sales.


The only one I try to make worse is we do try to fly somewhere as often as we can. :)



PS --- Judging from the picture, I have your cat's twin sleeping in the chair next to me.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CabalPowered Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
23. The original Wackernagel book is a great resource
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC