Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

filibuster4sanity.com *** Filibuster the War Criminals Protection Act ***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:51 PM
Original message
filibuster4sanity.com *** Filibuster the War Criminals Protection Act ***
http://filibuster4sanity.com">filibuster4sanity.com


. . .as you call Senators to lobby them to filibuster, call it what it is:

The War Criminals Protection Act of 2006


As you write letters to the editor (e.g., applaud NY Times for calling for a filibuster), call it what it is:

The War Criminals Protection Act of 2006


As you engage with others in cyberspace and in the Real World, call it what it is:

The War Criminals Protection Act of 2006


Let's inject this label into the noise machine!

Words are powerful. Labels move the game. If the label sticks, it could kill this thing.

http://filibuster4sanity.com">filibuster4sanity.com
Pass it Along!!


---------------
Note: http://filibusterforsanity.com">filibusterforsanity.com will work too. Both should be going to http://www.congress.org/congressorg/issues/alert/?alertid=9060001&content_dir=ua_congressorg&mailid=custom">A Soapbox Alert on Congress.org



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not gonna happen. Dems made a deal:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/washington/29detaincnd.html?hp&ex=1159502400&en=f804341525b03650&ei=5094&partner=homepage

WASHINGTON, Sept. 28 — The Senate today rejected an amendment to a bill creating a new system for interrogating and trying terror suspects that would have guaranteed such suspects access to the courts to challenge their imprisonment.

The vote was 51 to 48 against the amendment, which was offered by the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Judiciary Committee, Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont. The action set the stage for final passage of the bill, which was approved on Wednesday by the House of Representatives.

The bill’s ultimate passage was assured on Wednesday when Democrats agreed to forgo a filibuster in return for consideration of the amendment. Any changes in the Senate bill, however, would have made it impossible for Republican leaders to meet their goal of sending the bill to the White House before adjourning on Friday to hit the campaign trail.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So we should lay down and stop fighting?
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 01:58 PM by pat_k
Call them.

Express your outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I didn't say that. I'm just informing you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I had heard the reports, but thanks. They said Alito was a done deal too.
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 02:16 PM by pat_k
. . .and we came darn close to getting a filibuster.

And we DID get a heck of a lot of them to stand up and actually tell some truth.

Never say never is my motto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC