Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: Don't Suspend Habeas Corpus: "Great Writ" traced back to Magna Carta

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:41 AM
Original message
LAT: Don't Suspend Habeas Corpus: "Great Writ" traced back to Magna Carta
Editorial
Don't Suspend Habeas Corpus
Any bill that denies that basic right to detainees should be rejected.
September 28, 2006

....The problem with the legislation — even with the improvements forced on the White House by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) — is that it would make it impossible for alleged enemy combatants to file what is known as a writ of habeas corpus, which allows them to challenge the legality of their imprisonment.

In 2004, the Supreme Court rejected the Bush administration's position and ruled that detainees at the U.S. facility at Guantanamo Bay were entitled to file such petitions. In its decision, the high court cited a statute giving federal courts the authority to review habeas petitions. But in his majority opinion, Justice John Paul Stevens also quoted a 1945 case in which the court noted that habeas corpus is "a writ antecedent to statute … throwing its root deep into the genius of our common law." In fact, the "Great Writ" can be traced back to the Magna Carta. And although the Constitution allows Congress to suspend habeas corpus in "cases of rebellion or invasion," Specter rightly noted that "we don't have either."

The argument for allowing detainees to file habeas petitions goes beyond avoiding the embarrassment of a rebuke from the Supreme Court, which has already twice rebuffed the administration's legal strategy in the war against terrorism. Thirty-three former U.S. diplomats have sent a letter to Congress warning that "to deny habeas corpus to our detainees can be seen as prescription for how the captured members of our own military, diplomatic and NGO (nongovernmental organization) personnel stationed abroad may be treated."

On Wednesday, the House approved a bill that does not permit detainees to file habeas corpus petitions. That means that it will be up to (Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee) and his colleagues to preserve the Great Writ when the Senate votes, as early as today.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-ed-habeas28sep28,0,1017892.story?coll=la-home-commentary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. NOW they write of this?? Should have been a CONSTANT DRUMBEAT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. called Levin twice
Edited on Thu Sep-28-06 09:50 AM by gasperc
he trying to craft an amendment that challenges the ability to block an "alien" from jurisdiction to get a writ of habeas corpus. I told his office that what is to stop the government from picking anyone off the street, saying their an alien and hold them indefinately and SECRETLY! WITHOUT A WRIT TO CHALLENGE YOUR DETENTION, HOW CAN THIS BE PREVENTED!!!
Hopefully it kills the bill altogether, God help us if we codify torture


I have faith, we must always have faith
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC