Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Cover Story That Newsweek Doesn't Want to Sell to America

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:24 PM
Original message
The Cover Story That Newsweek Doesn't Want to Sell to America
The Cover Story That Newsweek Doesn't Want to Sell to America

Thanks to truthout for flagging this story on "Losing Afghanistan: The Rise of Jihadistan," which appears on the cover of international editions of Newsweek, but not the U.S. version. Truthout explains

snip>>Editor's Note: Newsweek has scrubbed the cover of its United States edition for October 2, 2006. The cover of its international editions, aimed at Europe and other world regions, has maintained the original title of the story, "Losing Afghanistan." The new cover for the United States edition features photographer Annie Leibovitz and is titled "My Life in Pictures." We offer the European edition cover and story here. - vh/TO
Although I haven't seen the printed Newsweek, I will note that the website still labels the in-depth feature on the regression in Afghanistan as its "cover story," and I assume that it did appear in print (commenters can please alert me if it did not). It's an important and timely story about the inroads the Taliban is making while the US-backed Afghan government crumbles.

Jabar Shilghari, one of Ghazni's members of Parliament, is appalled by his province's rapid reversal of fortune. Only a year ago he was freely stumping for votes throughout the province. Today it's not safe for him to return to his own village. In a recent meeting he asked Karzai for more police and soldiers; he was rebuffed by the deputy director of intelligence, who told him the Taliban threat in Ghazni is minimal. "We have patiently waited five years for change, for an end to official corruption and abuse of power and for economic development," says Shilghari, who now lives in the increasingly sequestered capital of Kabul. "But we've received nothing."
As a former magazine editor, I can make an educated guess why the folks at Newsweek opted for a celebrity cover rather than a news cover: a better shot at big newstand sales. Celeb covers nearly always sell far more than mere news -- you don't need to sit through the seminars I've endured to figure that one, but the actual differences in sales can be huge. And a foreign news story, in particular, is the kiss of death for newstand sales, regardless of how important the story is.

So the powers-that-be at Newsweek figure that they can attract readers in Europe, Asia and Latin America with a dramatic cover depicting an Islamist armed with an evil-looking rocket-propelled grenade launcher that seems to be aimed right at the reader, who -- it is to be assumed -- would be thus "grabbed" by the prospect of a hard-hitting news story. American readers, on the other hand, are assumed to prefer the soft pap of Newsweek Entertainment. "The audience is stupid" is the prevailing sentiment among the people at the top of the MSM, as Harry Shearer pointed out last week: "Whether or not they actually started out stupid, your programming decisions may help make them stupid." It's a self-fulfilling belief.<<snip.

LINK: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nellie-b/the-cover-story-that-news_b_30343.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. self kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rude Horner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just so you know, ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rude Horner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No problem
I just didn't want you to think people were ignoring your very good post. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. "while the US-backed Afghan government crumbles" "Losing Afghanistan."
The fact that Afgan is in trouble once again when Bush pulled out to fight another war based on fabricated intel. I remember Rummy stating there were better targets in Iraq...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drewskie Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. the same article appears in both editions...
I own the American version of that particular issue and it's in there. Not sure what to think about the cover, but any news consumer with any sort of curiosity looks beyond that anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. The reason we're losing Afghanistan is because we're in Iraq
No one's saying it, but what gave the Taliban their second wind was the wave of antiAmericanism that swept the region after Iraq--and every day Iraq is in the news, Afghanistan becomes more endangered too. Afghanistan was this administration's one success. Now it's down the tubes too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC