Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

C SPAN Vote coming up. Currently discussion of detainee treatment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:05 PM
Original message
C SPAN Vote coming up. Currently discussion of detainee treatment
and Trials Bill. No agreement to consideration of dems ammendment re Habeas Corpus. Repiglicans want to adjourn w/o conducting the business they were elected to do and w/o fucking discussion. They are just disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. As Louise Slaughter has pointed out
They put up 15 amendments in the Rules Committee, and got nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are going to get nowhere today either. Just outnumbered,
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 12:10 PM by lonestarnot
but not outgunned! SCOTUS strikes as unconstitutional, then we detain people we can neither prosecute, let go or detain, so then what the fuck do we do with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry amendment dealing with habeus corpus and interrogation -

SA 5056. Mr. KERRY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 5036 proposed by Mr. FRIST to the bill H.R. 6061, to establish operational control over the international land and maritime borders of the United States; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

On page 96, after line 19, add the following:

SEC. 11. EXPEDITED REVIEW.

(a) In General.--

(1) THREE-JUDGE DISTRICT COURT HEARING.--Any civil action challenging the legality of any provision of, or any amendment made by, this Act, shall be heard by a 3-judge panel in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia convened under section 2284 of title 28, United States Code. The exclusive venue for expedited review under this section shall be the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

(2) APPELLATE REVIEW.--An interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order of the court of 3 judges in an action under paragraph (1) shall be reviewable as a matter of right by direct appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. Any such appeal shall be taken by a notice of appeal filed not later than 10 calendar days after such order or judgment is entered and the jurisdictional statement shall be filed not later than 30 calendar days after such order or judgment is entered.

(3) EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION.--It shall be the duty of the District Court for the District of Columbia and the Supreme Court of the United States to advance on the docket and to expedite to the greatest possible extent the disposition of any matter brought under paragraph (1).

(b) Other Provision.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, section 950k(b) of title 10, United States Code, shall read as follows:

``(b) Review of Military Commission Procedures and Actions.--Except as otherwise provided in this chapter or section 11 of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and notwithstanding any other provision of law (including section 2241 of title 28 or any other habeas corpus provision), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever, including any action pending on or filed after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of military commissions under this chapter.''.



SA 5057. Mr. KERRY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 5036 proposed by Mr. FRIST to the bill H.R. 6061, to establish operational control over the international land and maritime borders of the United States; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

At the end, add the following:

SEC. 11. ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERROGATION OF ALIEN UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANTS UNDER CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES.

(a) Annual Report Required.--Not later than January 31 each year, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to Congress a report on the interrogation of alien unlawful enemy combatants under the custody or control of the United States during the preceding calendar year.

(b) Elements.--Each report under subsection (a) shall set forth, for the year covered by such report, the following:

(1) The types of interrogation methods utilized.

(2) The types of information gathered as a result of the interrogations.

(c) Form of Reports.--

(1) INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEES.--Each report under subsection (a) shall be provided to all members of the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives in the form of a written and oral classified briefing.

(2) CONGRESS GENERALLY.--Each report under subsection (a) shall be otherwise submitted to Congress in unclassified form, with a classified annex if appropriate.

(d) Unlawful Enemy Combatant Defined.--In this section, the term ``unlawful enemy combatant'' has the meaning given that term in section 948a(1) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 3 (as added by Senate amendment No. 5036).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Another 5 minute vote! No deliberation! Fuckers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They are not interested in homeland security. That is obvious
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 12:21 PM by lonestarnot
here. Port security is something that can wait as demonstrated by their inaction. 222 to 194 now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. This whole thing is a railroading.
No decent amendment is allowed a hearing. How did the system get so out of whack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. is this CSPAN2? thanks.
Fristy is bsing there. OMG, fighting a blind war without adequate intellegence and terrorists can't be tried without this bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's still in comittee, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. debating on the floor -
well - not really debating. More like constant maneuvering and moving the goalposts around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. oh okay thanks! I'm gonna tune in to Cspan 2 then
I see this as historic. It's also NOWHERE in our press :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent argument by Jeff Binghaman (D)
If indeed as the guvmint syas, these detainees are the worst of the worst, surely putting them through a decent trial will show that to be the case!

But I think a lot of them are WRONGFULLY imprisoned...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Binghaman reads letter by 30 diplomats he received
saying that to not stand by the most important relief avenue against wrongfull imprisonement would not be acceptable to a country promoting democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Warner : aliens do not have the rights of a US citizen, but we consider
them human" - "strike a balance"
:puke:
Soooooo there are 2 classes of people when it comes to the aplication of democracy : US citzizens, and "others".

Bleh.

followed by 9/11 an nauseam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Levin (D) : with 56 seconds left (OMG at that)
saying the bill before them now is critically different from the bill that passed comittee.

2 examples of fundamental principles violated :
1) americans can be searched without warrant
2) cruel and degrading treatment is allowed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Levin and Warner are now having a debate over some wording
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Warner and Levin battling
Warner : torture is not allowed
Levin : but cruel and degrading is allowed

Levin also states that it's okay to admit illegally obtained evidence in court, in the case of aliens, as there the coercing may have happened outside the US, and they don't have the fourth...

sorry, but :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC