Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I phoned both my Senators' offices and my Congressperson's office...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:00 AM
Original message
I phoned both my Senators' offices and my Congressperson's office...
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 09:02 AM by Eric J in MN
...this morning against the Military Tribunals bill.

During one of the calls, I said I hope the Senator will vote against the bill because I share the concerns in an editorial in today's Washington Post, "Rush to Error."


Congress should not allow itself to be pushed into approving a flawed plan for holding terrorist suspects.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006; Page A26

AFTER BARELY three weeks of debate, the Senate today will take up a momentous piece of legislation that would set new legal rules for the detention, interrogation and trial of accused terrorists. We have argued that the only remedy to the mess made by the Bush administration in holding hundreds of detainees without charge at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere since 2001 was congressional action. Yet rather than carefully weigh the issues, Congress has allowed itself to be stampeded into a vote on hastily written but far-reaching legal provisions, in a preelection climate in which dissenters risk being labeled as soft on terrorism.

...Foremost among (the bill's problems) is the legislation's attempt to prevent U.S. courts from ruling on the treatment of prisoners in the future, including any procedures the Bush administration might adopt for interrogations. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) fought for language in the bill that he believes would stop practices such as simulated drowning, prolonged sleep deprivation and induced hypothermia, but many lawyers believe the administration could interpret the law to permit such abuse.

...A second major problem with the bill is its definition of who could be regarded as an enemy combatant and thus be subject to the exceptional detention and trial procedures. Another hasty agreement over the weekend would allow foreign civilians in the United States or even U.S. citizens to be arrested and held without charge indefinitely on grounds that they "supported hostilities against the United States."


Contact info for Senators:
http://contactcongress.blogspot.com/

You can use Google or www.vote-smart.org to find your Congressperson's contact info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hi Eric.
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 09:03 AM by myrna minx
:hi: What did Coleman's office say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I called Senator Norm Coleman's office and asked
...to speak to someone about the Military Tribunals bill.

I was told that the people involved with the bill were in a meeting, and I was connected to someone's voice-mail. I left a message saying I share the concerns in "Rush to Error" editorial in today's Washington Post that the torture would contine and that the definition of who can be detained indefiniately is too broad, and that I hope the Senator will vote against the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Please contact Congress against the Military Tribunals bill.
It would allow torture to continue.

http://contactcongress.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. If you don't want to phone, then please email...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC