Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GALLOP: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 07:56 AM
Original message
GALLOP: Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden
September 27, 2006
Bush Blamed More Than Clinton for Failure to Capture Bin Laden
Views are predictably partisan; independents mostly blame Bush

by Lydia Saad

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- The recent firestorm over former President Bill Clinton's culpability for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks was fueled on Tuesday when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice contrasted President Bush's efforts to pursue al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden with Clinton's efforts. Clinton has strongly denied various suggestions that his administration missed key opportunities to kill bin Laden and left the Bush administration without a comprehensive anti-terrorism strategy. However, Bush -- whom Clinton says did nothing about al-Qaeda for the first eight months of his presidency -- has the bigger image problem with Americans on the issue.

According to a recent Gallup Panel survey, the American public puts the primary blame on Bush rather than Clinton for the fact that bin Laden has not been captured. A majority of Americans say Bush is more to blame (53%), compared with 36% blaming Clinton.

more at:
http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=24733
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. 36% is way too high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. 36% sounds about right to me.
That's only one percent higher than I would ever expect it to be-35% is the floor as far as the sheep are concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. That's right.. that's the 33 percenters, plus a few other idiots who don't
know the truth of the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think that 36% would back Bush if he ate a baby. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. a live one, on national TV
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 08:17 AM by BlueEyedSon
"eating them over here so we don't have to eat them over there...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. While wearing stockings and a dress....
I tell you that thirty something percent just thinks he is God....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. As long as they have their tax-cuts
...and that the administration reaffirms their own prejudices, then that's all that matters. I think even if Bush was caught having sex with stray animals, his voters would proclaim it a "left-wing conspiracy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. after the one-sided rape he's been receiving for 5 years
it's not too horrible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. What did * do in first 8 months to pursue bin Laden?
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 08:48 AM by CJCRANE
Should be the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark E. Smith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. You mean Bush lounging about his vanity ranch in 2001
... for almost that entire summer wasn't enough for the American people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. bush is 100% more to blame. He had 100% backing of Congress.
Congress hogtied Clinton. Also, Clinton's NSA did not demote Richard Clarke.

Clinton released (or is willing to release) documentation to prove his assertions. bush refuses.

Wake up, 36 percenters. You are being lied to, BIG-TIME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. They like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. he is doing nothing now
he did nothing then, pretended to do something, and is doing nothing now - he is a do nothing guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. AMEN!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. 9/11 happened on the chimp's watch...
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 09:26 AM by Virginia Dare
that fact can never be denied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
15. wow
This is very encouraging news.I think they opened up a can of worms with 'The Path to 9/11' that they weren't prepared for.
They - ABC/Disney/RightWing NUTS - said it would open up a dialogue?Ha!It sure as hell has.I don't think they thought it would go this way though.

Yes Sir,the Truth is coming out...and it's not lookin' good for the idiot Prez. :kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. Oops! Sorry, Didn't See Your Post, I Just Posted This Too!
Oh well, it's good news and you can never get too much of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC