Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, would President Gore be in the Oval Office today if he'd used Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:39 PM
Original message
So, would President Gore be in the Oval Office today if he'd used Clinton
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 05:24 PM by villager
on the campaign trail in '00?

Does today's Clinton-capture of the news-cycle from the Darkside show that?

Or did Bill lack the particular, angry "fire in the belly" then? Remember Clinton's recent library-opening comments about "liking" both Bush and Kerry...

Maybe ol' Grande Woof wouldn'ta been capable, or allowed himself, to unleash (so to speak?) that way in earlier campaigns...

And: Will he keep at 'em, now that they're momentarily dazed in the late rounds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
boolean Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nobody knew how bad * would be back then...
I don't think it would've made a difference. People only cared about a blowjob and what it would do to the "children" back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. no one would've listened, true -- but some of us
knew exactly how bad Bush would be -- you could see the psychosis in his eyes, during the "debates." Really... I kept having "Dead Zone" type moments of what it would mean for America if that psychopath got it...

And I wasn't alone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I was with you

*I* didn't like the little shit from the very first time I saw him on the tube. I had a feeling
that bunnypants was lying when he said that he was a "compassionate conservative" and a "uniter, not
a divider". When I told my friends this, they all told me he would follow in his dads footsteps
and be, at most, a corporatist... and that nominating Cheney for the Veep spot was a sop to his
right wing base and a signal that GHW presidency would be continued by the dimson. But I argued
that there wasn't something "right" about *, and that Gore and * were really waaay different beasts,
not two sides of the same coin (I was arguing with fellow Greenies that wanted to vote for Nader).

Never in my life have I been more sorry about being right.

* has turned out to be the opposite of Gore, and the worst thing to challenge our democracy in the
entire history of the US (including the civil war).

I resigned my Green party membership the day the supreme court ruled on Bush V. Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. yeah, I wish I'd been wrong about the exact same set of vibes
Alas, if anything, the "vibestream" underestimated how mean/vindictive/amoral the little shit would be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Also, way back during the 2000 "debates" some of us were very suspicious
that Chimpyshit was being fed his answers through an earpiece...

I knew he was going to be BAD, but didn't imagine it would get THIS bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
37. I saw the vacuous POS as TX governor
People in TX especially knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
42. Oh yes they did
A LOT of people knew. Just not enough, thanks to the media worship and NO investigation of Bush's past record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, Gore didn't stand a chance, neither did Kerry.
They're honorable men fighting rats that have no morals. In a dirty fight, the cheater wins everytime.

I love what Al Gore has become and feel sorry (like I always do) for Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. so how do we fight amoral rightwing nihilists, then?
he asked, out of curiosity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. We don't, we lay down and die.
We wait until they kick in OUR door, before we officially declare fascism. Until then, we just bide our time like a clock counting down the days.

Hey, look on the brightside! American Empire sounds so much more manly!!!!

Actually we don't need to fight it, Bush is on a self-fulfilling prophesy of failure. We (Dems), unfortunately (like we did for Reagan) will be leftover to 'clean up the mess'. Like always.

The Repukers 'crash the party' and we get left with the bill and cleaning up the mess they make.

Like always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. when the actual grown-ups are in charge again?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. YES!!!
At least until the children find a way to outsmart the grown-ups again. It does happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. yet my children have way more ethics & compassion that GOPpers...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. That's true, we should NEVER call them children.
It is an insult to kids everywhere. Let us be honest, Bush/Cheney are evil men who love death and suffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. it's "thanatos syndrome" all the way with this cabal!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Gore didn't stand a chance? - Supreme court stopped count, appointed
Bush the winner when Dade County Florida wasn't finished counting !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. And to this day, history records Gore as the 2000 winner.
But, as we all know, history can be rewritten and 'facts' altered for world domination organizations like Carlyle and Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton's lapses were the reason Bush "won".
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 05:39 PM by MidwestTransplant
Edited to add quotation marks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. true enough -- Clinton's weaknesses hampered Gore, but:
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 04:50 PM by villager
would Gore's margin of actual victory been more tamper-proof if Clinton had campaigned in the south?

Or has it taken this long for Clinton to "wake up" from his careful political persona? (Which he may have been rebelling against with the whole Lewinsky thing, but enuff armchair shrinking...)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Oh man! I'm glad I'm wearing my boots!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
39. The Republicans would have had no argument in 2000
if not for Clinton. I like him very much, think he was a great president but he is to blame. Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Bush didn't win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. True. I shold revise to say "reason Bush assumed the presidency."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes...
...not only that, his choice of "Holy Joe" Lieberman as his running mate, to "distance" himself from Clinton, was a huge error.

Granted it's hindsight and Monday morning quarterbacking, still, a smart politician should have realized two things: (a) Clinton and Gore had an *excellent* record to present that Gore could have used; and (b) Clinton was still hugely popular (66-67% approval ratings, even at the height of the impeachment proceedings).

Man oh man, I surely wish he'd have made some different choices.

But that was then and this is now, we can't rewrite history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton got impeached because media wanted him to. Gore got impeachmented
next. And then Kerry got impeachmented.

This is the new corporate media REALITY.

Clinton couldn't stop the media from impeaching him, and couldn't stop the media move against Gore, and post 9-11 media was NEVER going to honestly cover another Democrat or American issue - no matter what.

THAT's the reality. That's our real battle. They are the front line of offense and defense for BushInc, and it's past time the Dem party start exposing them, or risk never being heard fairly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. blm....you and I know "Dem Party" wil Never Expose this ...so why would
you think that getting Dems in would cause this to be exposed? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boolean Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. And guys...Let's not forget that Gore actually may have WON
Voter disenfranchisement in Florida, a stacked supreme court...I don't know if the voting machines were rigged in 2000 (Though they were in 2002 and in 2004).

And Gore won the popular vote, remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bush said, I won Florida, My Brother told me I would
win Florida.... I don't think it would of mattered....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Can't we remember that
Gore won. And given what happen in Ohio, Kerry probably also won. Could Clinton have stopped Rove from fixing the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. What is the point of this question?
I just don't believe we can analyze exactly the politics and the media at that time. Gore is not sitting in the White House for many reasons and I blame the media for most of it. I also blame the campaign for thinking the media was neutral but I don't believe many of us would have thought otherwise at that time. We are too frustrated, angry, too close to truly analyze what happened. I have my theories but I wonder if it's what I'll believe in a few decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. this very conversation's the point -- as well as a rumination on Clinton's
late-found explosiveness....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. Clinton has said from the beginning that the impeachment issue was
strictly partisan politics...With the Clinton approval rating still high Gore would have benefited with Clinton campaigning..(he probably would have carried Arkansas)but Gore would have benefited even more had he not chose Lieberman as VP..
But the fact is Gore didn't lose...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. all true --
A stronger ticket without Lieberman, a chance to carry Arkansas if Clinton had campaigned there, and in spite of it, he actually won anyway...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. If he WON HIS HOME STATE. It's not about Clinton. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Uh, election fraud did not happen only in FL, Plenty of questionable
things occurred in Tennessee as well, though it hasn't gotten much publicity. Gore may very well have won TN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebuzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
40. I live in Tennessee.
Edited on Tue Sep-26-06 09:42 AM by peacebuzzard
people who live here know why he lost.

Gore is a progressive liberal. Most Tennesseans are not.

In order to live here, one must really enjoy other diversions rather than sensible current affairs dialogs while you are out and about.

Oh, you can talk about the weather, the football games, holidays, children........But global impact, or even local dilemmas are tough to hash out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. Gore could have won New Hampshire had Nader not run
But Nader wasn't the only factor in getting Bush in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. I know this may sound strange like I am bragging of claiming
Psychic ability but way back in 99 I predicted that bush would win(and my phrase then was) by hook or by crook.
But it was not clairvoyant ability but something I saw in poppy bush that made me realize that he was supposed to win against Clinton in 92 to finish his agenda (which at the time I did not know just what that was) He counted on his popularity rating and his war in the gulf and figured wrongly that he was a shoo in.
So when boy george ran and got the nomination I was sure he would be the next president because the stakes for the neo cons were too high to rely on winning fairly. Boy george was going to win no matter how many votes they would have to steal, but the trick was to steal just enough to win and make it close so as not to be obvious.
Mission accomplished and again in 04.
So there we are and in06 the stakes are still high unless they can get the War Crimes Protection Act passed. That is there plan B in case something goes wrong in the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. er, have you "seen" "Plan B" then?
Anything we should know about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. No of course not
But it seems to me that the legislation could be a get out of jail free card if something should go wrong and the democrats win the election.
My point in this is to say that the neo cons have a lot riding on this election...they could wind up on trail for some of the things they did so I expect them to pull out every dirty trick in there bag to win it.
The biggest mistake we could make is to underestimate them because of a tin foil hat you may see on my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. well, no, their side is capable of anything...
going back to the "lone nut" assassinations of the 60's -- so yes, praise the Lord and pass the tinfoil!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
29. That was then, this is now. Monica wasn't a footnote in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
32. NO!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
38. No, but maybe if they chose someone other than JoMentum he would be. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
41. You shall have no wine before its time...
No. That time was different from today. Circumstances have changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
44. gore
He blew it by making Lieberwoman his VP choice...........period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
45. President Gore needed to distance himself from corporat rule and Clinton's
corporatocracy/globalization enabling......... his numbers would have pulled away from the ripoff perpetrated by Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. yeah, he needed to shed the DLC cloak...
which, it appears, he finally has...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC