Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Am Against Torture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:42 AM
Original message
I Am Against Torture

I am against torture; clearly and unequivocally. It is time for everyone to come out and say it. In the land of the free home of the brave, United States of America is actually bringing to a vote in Congress, a bill allowing torture. This cannot endure.

I am fifty five years old, born in USA, served in the USA military and have two purple hearts. A person actually has to come out and stand in opposition to his government's sponsoring torture.


How in the world did it come to this?


I am an America loving American proudly wearing the honorable label of liberal. "What ever happened to the 'land of the free - home of the brave?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am against torture too.
Now what are we going to do about it?

Did you know that on Sept 25th, 2005 over a quarter of a million people surrounded the White House in protest of the war? You probably didn't hear about it. It wasn't televised and the corporate media didn't mention it.

If we have a protest against torture, we need to do more than just surround the WH. We need to stay for days and we need to do it in large numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinkfoot Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another Vet Against Torture
I am a Vietnam Vet who faced the prospect of torture if captured, and I echo this sentiment. I am appalled that our glorious nation has sunk to the level of advocating torture. I am equally appalled that our democratic representatives are so afraid of being labeled "soft on terrorism" that they are ready to surrender our honor and our liberty. If our leaders won't stand up against torture, what will they stand up for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hello and Welcome to the Democratic Underground!
:hi: and Welcome! I agree with you 100%. What has this nation of ours come to if it endorses torture? We must all ask ourselves this question for we know it is wrong and I certainly to not approve of it on any level whatsoever.

What does the USA stand for? Torture. :evilfrown:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Welcome To DU. - Stand For Freedom From Fear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. "If our leaders won't stand up against torture,"
They refuse to fight for their country when the chips are really down! When the country needs them most, they are cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Welcome to DU... and thanks for your service
:toast: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. I am against torture.
I am ashamed that I have to stand up and say this. Torture is not an American value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am too, unclearly and equivocally... help me get right on this.

Ok. I've mostly not been saying anything about torture because I want to be clearly and unequivocally against it, but I'm not. Sure, I'm against torture for confessions (past deeds) and, of course, the innocent, but what about those situations where you know you have a knowledgeable person with time urgent information that can save lives?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. There is already a law on the books to deal with the
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 10:25 AM by Spike from MN
situation you mentioned. In a nutshell, the law states that in the event of a dire emergency, imminemt attack, etc., torture can be used as a means to extract information that can be used to save lives. I wasn't aware of this law either until I heard KO mention it on his show last week.

Of course, that still doesn't address the issue that information gained through torture is notoriously unreliable. Victims will say absolutely anything to get the pain to stop so it's rather difficult to assume that information gathered under the "emergency" clause would be any different. However, the law is there nonetheless, most likely because in a dire emergency where lives are at stake and time is of the essence, it wouldn't be realistic to wait for a court ruling on the issue before proceeding with "aggressive interrogation." Also, since we have the "emergency" clause already on the books, they can't claim they don't have the tools they need to defend us and that's probably another reason the law was put into place.

I'm against any and all forms of torture and, though I see what you're saying aikoaiko, I don't think torture doled out even under an "emergency" situation would actually help save lives because, as stated above, information gathered through torture is notoriously unreliable. KO has been covering this a lot lately so if you want some more info, you might want to check out the transcripts of his show for the last week or so on the MSNBC website. The interview with the ex-CIA agent on Wednesday was particularly good. Here's a link to the transcripts page. (Scroll down to the Keith Olbermann section and click away. I believe the "emergency" clause was discussed on Friday's show but the transcript for that one isn't up yet.)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3719710/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. thanks for the helpful response.


I didn't know about the emergency clause either. I'll have to look that up. KO is really on the ball lately, but I've missing his show due to work.

The issue of the effectiveness of tortore is an interesting one. I too heard many "experts" in news shows talk about it being unreliable around the time of Abu Ghraib, but they never explain how they came up with that conclusion. Did they actually torture people and compared the accuracy rates of info gleaned from non-tortured individuals? Based on what information do the anti-torture proponents make their claims.

I know this question is replusive in many ways, but I guess these are the times we live in. Even if it is effective, the high moral road may be to still ban it completely. The quetion of whether or not torture works has an empirical answer and I haven't seen an data or reports on the matter. I suppose that sort of information isn't provided to the average citizen.

Thanks again for the helpful and sympathetic response.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. No problem.
Here's the quote by President Clinton from Friday's show:

Like you take this interrogation deal, we might all say the same thing, if, let‘s say, Osama bin Laden‘s No. 3 guy were captured and we knew a big bomb was going off in America in three days. Turns out, right now, there‘s an exception for those kinds of circumstances in an immediate emergency that‘s proven in the military ranks. But that‘s not the same thing as saying, we want to abolish the Geneva Conventions and practice torture as a matter of course. All it does is make soldiers vulnerable to torture and make us more likely to get bad not good information.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14999415/


Unfortunately he doesn't go into detail so it's not all that informative but the emergency exception was news to me nonetheless.

The uselessness of info gained through torture is borne out not by comparing it to "non-tortured individuals" but rather on the basis of the actual info itself. A classic example would be the case of the Canadian that has been in the news recently. This individual was "renditioned" to Syria where he was tortured and "confessed" to having been in an Al Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan. He was eventually released and, as it turns out, not only is he not a member of Al Qaeda, he has never even been to Afghanistan. Here's a quote:

Hours later, he said, he was taken to Syria and there he was forced to write that he had been to a training camp in Afghanistan. "They kept beating me, and I had to falsely confess," he said. "I was willing to confess to anything to stop the torture."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A522-2003Nov4¬Found=true


His is but one in a case of many that have have "confessed" under torture to things they didn't do. Here's a quote from KO's interview with former CIA agent Jack Rice that further serves to demonstrate just how useless info gained under torture really is.

OLBERMANN: That—this is not that tough, is it? I mean, you torture somebody, and basically he will tell you whatever it is he thinks you want to know?

RICE: Absolutely. It‘s that simple. I mean, when you look at a story like this, any of these stories, you push hard enough, you hurt long enough, you‘re going to get what you want. I can use a waterboard on you, and I guarantee, you‘ll tell me you‘re Bill O‘Reilly. That‘s a scary thought.

OLBERMANN: Yes, indeed, and I‘ll do it within a minute and a half, by the way. But (INAUDIBLE), its value, then, torture, or if we want to use any of the euphemisms for it, torture‘s value as a means of gaining information, as opposed to just as a tool for sadism, is what, exactly?

RICE: Well, it‘s useless. I mean, when you think about this, let‘s pull back to something in the States, admissibility of evidence. When we look at that, we realize that we don‘t allow torture or abuse because we want reliability. That‘s the reason we have that standard.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14938435/


If torture could make KO say that he's O'Reilly, well, I think that more than proves the point. If you'll read through the entire interview as well as some of the other transcripts from KO's recent shows on the subject, I believe you'll find that the experts are in agreement that info gained through torture is notoriously unreliable.

LOL, I don't know that you could call my response "sympathetic" as I in no way support torture, even under the "emergency" clause. By "I see what you're saying", I meant that the issue that you brought up is a common argument that is used to justify torture but, as others have stated, it's also a false one. Perhaps I should have clarified that in my earlier post. Note that I am not "flaming" you for bringing it up but I just wanted to make it clear where I stand on the torture issue and also (hopefully) demonstrate that while the "emergency" clause is there, any info that may be garnered through it is actually rather useless. Thus the clause itself is rather useless and should in no way be used to justify torture. In my view, there is nothing that justifies treating another human being (or animal, for that matter) in an inhumane manner and I am absolutely appalled at what the current administration has been doing. I am also shocked that they can find so many people that are apparently willing to dole out torture at the drop of a hat. It is truly beyond me how anyone can treat another human being like that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emanymton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Never Accept Torture. This Is A BS Scenario For Sake Of Smoke
screne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't know how we got to this point, and I never could have
ever dreamed that we'd see this debate even taking place!

What has happened?

Are these terrorists really more dangerous to our country than our old enemies were?

Is terrorism really more dangerous to our security than the Cold War with its constant threat of nuclear annihilation?

We are on the brink of losing that which has made our country unique in the world, and it breaks my heart.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. kcik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. We came to this via a bushitler diablo smelling of sulfur!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. I too am against torture.
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 01:05 PM by notadmblnd
Hell, I don't even smack my kids. I ignore spiders and will go out of my way to swish a fly out of the house instead of smashing him with the swatter and wonder if my plants are in pain when I pick fruit or flowers from the garden. I just can't stand the thought of inflicting pain on another living being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-25-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hate Torture? Protest on Oct 5th!
Edited on Mon Sep-25-06 03:32 PM by petgoat
Nationwide day of repudiation.



http://www.worldcantwait.net/




Get your orange jumpsuit on ebay and a pillowcase for your head and
you're a one-person demonstration.

I like to kneel across the street outside churches when the 10:00 is
letting out and the 11:00 is going in. In half an hour I can influence
several hundred people to consider the hypocrisy of professing "turn the
other cheek" and "love thine enemy" when we torture people.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-26-06 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
17. I hate torture
I don't care why,it's ALWAYS WRONG. Torture is EVIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC