Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSM directs people's thoughts...they have succeeded in

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NotGivingUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:22 AM
Original message
MSM directs people's thoughts...they have succeeded in
keeping a lot of discussion of Chavez' speech to one focused little area...he called bush the devil...how dare he! I say let's beat them at their own game...let's not let them have their day. Chavez came forward and said what had to be said. He brought up a lot of important issues. We'll never run out of worthwhile discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. They sure didn't mention his "standing O". . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotGivingUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah...it's funny how we never heard a word about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Columnist Trudy Rubin in the Phila Inquirer talks about it today
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/editorial/15592446.htm

She's a thoughtful and knowledgeable critic of this administration. Her column today doesn't exactly overflow with approval for Chavez, but she notes the UN reaction to his speech and then explores the reasons for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Briefly - only in "why did they DO that?" and "I don't understand why they
would DO that!"

and

"Isn't that .just HORRIBLE?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hugo explains...
Edited on Sun Sep-24-06 08:43 AM by Karenina
http://www.pbs.org/kcet/tavissmiley/archive/200609/20060922_transcript.html

Tavis: The first question of this conversation I think has to be your comment calling President Bush the devil. There are some who have labeled your speech at the U.N. just days ago the most undiplomatic speech ever given at the U.N. To the American public, clarify or share with us why you chose to call George Bush the devil.

Chavez: Thank you very much for your question. Allow me to make the following comment. In order to come here, some considered my speech undiplomatic. How diplomatic is it to bombard cities? Is it diplomatic to command the killing of thousands of innocent people? I think today some stirred or smiled when I say what I said. I think it was rather a humoristic speech and caused no damage, no aggression. I said I smelled sulfur here. I think people were having a good time. They were smiling.

Now let's go to the bottom of the issue. Is it not a devilish action to order the invasion of a country? Lying to your own citizens? Throwing high-position bombs and highly destructive bombs against houses filled with people? Against entire peoples? You see, it is really an act of devils to use weapons of mass destruction, to use chemical weapons, against entire cities, poisoning the air, poisoning the water. In Fallujah, even the birds died. Cockroaches died. All traces of life disappeared in Fallujah. That's an act of devils.

My words are worth nothing. What matters is the truth and my words only reflect reality. It is nothing personal. It is something coming from ethics and morality. My words are just a cry, a scream, a clamor for justice, for reflection on the citizens that cannot support gross actions conducted by President Bush.

Tavis: Words do have meaning...

Chavez: Well, that's a perspective. That's a point of view. It's very confusing that what you have said has some value, I might also say. There are words, in this case, one word that says very clearly what we can say with a thousand words and perhaps because it is a strong word, and it is indeed, it might move the consciousness of the people, of some people. But from my perspective, they're a little bit sleepy. They're sleeping.

They are not realizing what is going on or they are confounded and the United States president is supported by a powerful media mechanism or equipment power. It even manipulates in some religious ideas. He said, one, that he was the mandate of God. He considers himself a God and that's a terrible manipulation since this is obeying the interests that are against God. I think he considers himself like God. When I call him devil, it's just to strike a balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotGivingUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thanks for posting this EXCELLENT interview! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep-in the context of strategic influence-- perception management,
propaganda, mind control, psy-ops are MSM.

MSM Owners (from Columbia Journalism Review)
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/

"Reality vs. perception management: the tinfoil controversy"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x71919#top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Of course
The purpose of the MSM was always to direct our thoughts. There's a beguiling theory that the MSM exists to deliver news (it's product) to consumers (us). It doesn't. In actuality, we are the product, the advertisers are the consumers. And the news the MSM covers is always going to be shaped around attracting the right kind of consumers to it's product. What the corporate news has only realised in the last fifty years or so is that the process works both ways: While they can attract the right kind of consumer to their product, they can also create more of the right kind of consumer. Since it's in the corporate interest to not have a Democratic president, that means creating more Republican consumers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. This Is Part Of A Bigger Astroturf Job
Chavez is being demonized as another "enemy" in this world full of "terror". It's all based on characatures and false information eminating inside the beltway and is said ad hominum until it's "assumed" this is fact.

I can't recall how many times I've heard Chavez refered to as a "dictator"...when he was more fairly elected than his assholiness, mr. booosh. They paint broad strokes as if the entire world is "out to get us"...which plays right into the major meme Rove and his henchmen are trying to spread. It's fear, and nothing but. We don't know Chavez is "out to kill us", but we know he is...just as much as every other demon is. It's the strawman game they play so well.

Of course the corporate media is gonna focus on what Chavez said and how he said it. First...like the Dean scream, they have a soundbite they can run endlessly and re-inforce the "madman" impression. Then they look for an "enemy" that stirs the pot that generates the ratings.

Issues be damned...and it's time for Democrats to realize we're not in a campaign of ideas here...it's rapidly turning into one of base emotions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Offered for consideration, from UN recognized expert on nonlethal
weapons and human rights activist Cheryl Welsh.
"The 1950's Secret Discovery of the Code of the Brain: U.S. and Soviet Scientists Have Developed the Key to Consciousness for Military Purposes" by Cheryl Welsh May 1998
http://www.mindjustice.org/book_frameset.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-24-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Swiftboating Chavez
GOP doesn't seem to like legally elected leaders of foreign countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC