Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING NEWS: 100% of lung cancer victims were exposed to automobile

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 10:59 PM
Original message
BREAKING NEWS: 100% of lung cancer victims were exposed to automobile
exhaust.

For the last 100 years.

Leading us to believe that automobiles are the leading cause of cancer.

STOP DRIVING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is the point of this?
Is it supposed to be funny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No... it's logic.
Not funny. True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. I still can't tell if you're being serious or not
Though I suppose it doesn't really matter, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. everyone who breathes car exhaust doesn't die. my dad just died
from cancer started by smoking. I have nothing but contempt for smoking and compassion for smokers. I will however never let one in my house or stand beside one. I LOATHE smoking in the way only someone who has lost a father, a grandfather, two uncles, two aunts and four cousins to cancer from smoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. i think you meant to respond to the OP
I agree with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #33
61. sorry. I meant to. Sometimes you think you are right under them when you
Edited on Sat Sep-23-06 01:00 AM by roguevalley
post and then you aren't. :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. No.... If you live in this or the last century, you have breathed car
exhaust. And, I promise, you will die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #38
64. If you've lived in any century in any place in the world
you drink water and will die (if you haven't already.)

Doesn't mean that the water killed you, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #38
79. You promise? Really?
It reminds me of the old joke -- what is the leading cause of death? Life.

Then, there's the song "Cancer," by Joe Jackson: "Everything, gives you cancer. There's no cure, there's no answer, everything gives you cancer."

No one here gets out alive. I thought we all knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #26
59. Not right away
it takes a while, but many people do end up getting sick from it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. No, it's not logic.
Because 100 % of those who did NOT develop lung cancer also were exposed to car exhaust.

By your type of "logic," that would mean that car exhaust has been shown to protect people against lung cancer.

You need to take a logic class. What you have described is a fallacy, not a logically true statement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
50. By your logic then...
Oxygen is carcinogenic.

Water is carcinogenic.

Vegetables are carcinogenic.

Freakin' BEEF is carcinogenic, as is baby-food, breast milk, and a cool morning breeze.

Let us not forget dirt, fish, poultry, and gravity.

Good logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #50
62. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #50
74. I think you're right.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #50
87. Actually, Oxygen IS carcinogenic.
Breathing is the leading cause of cancer. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
81. I believe that is a Logical Fallacy
I believe that is a Logical Fallacy called a "Spurious Correlation"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
58. We need more research on lung cancer
Lots of people get it who never smoked cigarettes. And many who get it didn't smoke before, either.

Imagine all the pioneer folk who lived in cabins and houses with little or no venting for fireplaces, etc. They didn't get cancer, according to ACS. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Show_Me _The_Truth Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #58
73. I'm sure your logic has accounted for the fact
Edited on Sat Sep-23-06 07:09 AM by Show_Me _The_Truth
that they were only expected to live into their late 30's or early 40's right?

So again, using your logic, we see that the added pollution in the air actually serves to increase our life-spans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
75. He's trying to justify smoking
And that second hand smoke isn't a big deal... thread after thread on this same thing the last few years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Shhhhh....
That's not what people want to hear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. They probably don't want to hear this, either
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/centers/2002News/news6.htm

(the above-linked article mentions automobile exhaust specifically; the earlier one only mentioned coal-fired power plants, factory emissions and diesel exhaust.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, 100% of deaths are related to being born. What's you're point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Carcinogens, mother*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Ah, that's clearer. I thought you were just making a flip comment.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
43. Who... me?
Never! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. LOL
This is perfect. In my comp classes I'm teaching the "causal argument" unit and we're just getting into logical fallacies and the complexities of arguing causal relationships. Think I might throw this in on Monday as an example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. composition classes? or compensation classes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Personally, I think that would be a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. There's plenty of research...
that indicates that atmospheric pollution in the form of automobile exhaust is a significant contributing factor to lung cancer and other respiratory diseases; so it's not entirely fallacious (since a causal relationhip has been determined).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. No, but it would be a good example of what seems like
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 11:29 PM by blonndee
a hasty generalization. If there indeed is statistical evidence, we can also discuss it in terms of correlation. Could lead to a bigger discussion--we'll have to see how it goes. Right now we're still discussing "cause" very generally and the potential for mistaking correlation or precedence for cause, so I can use this as we review on Monday. I'll be sure to mention (in passing, of course ;-) ) that all the focus on secondhand smoke raises questions of causality when it comes to pollution and other factors. I'm trying to get them beyond the linear type of thinking (A causes B causes C, etc) and more into an exploratory type of analysis, and toward being open to tentative conclusions and to questioning "commonly held" causal explanations (good way to bring in newsmedia and propaganda in an indirect and nonpreachy way).

But thanks for that! You're helping me with my lesson plan. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ah, but how do you discount the effect of...
exposure to the notorious DiHydrogen Oxide? Doesn't this pose a far more ominous threat than mere automobiles? Detroit has nothing on the DiHydrogen Oxide industry - their product is worldwide!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Okay.... I'm not a chemist.
What is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. H2O
Water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. LOL... Yeah.. Guilty of that indulgance as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spacelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. WATER, it can kill you in large quantities. DO NOT overdose. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. One of the most dangerous chemicals known to man!
It has been responsible for trillions of dollars of damage to our cities, because the government refuses to properly regulate it. Thousands of people die every year from exposure to this malignancy while our government sits on its hands.

Did you know that you can get DiHydrogen Oxide in a store without a prescription? They'll even sell it to (gasp) children!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. 8 hydrogens can connect to a chain of 3 carbons.
Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. What does that have to do with anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. About as much as the op has to do with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Ah, got it
cheers :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. LOL
cheers :toast: People are being rough on Joad tonight. He meant no harm. lighten up folks for shit sakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. And when combusted, it produces DHO as a byproduct!
DiHydrogen Oxide (DHO) is one of the products of combustion from the alkane you mention and IMHO should be regulated - think of the children!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Yes, so I'm supposed to ride my bike 40 miles per day? Not.
I'm too old!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. Riding your bike...
risks exposure to DHO emissions. Some areas are so saturated with this that you probably shouldn't leave the house. Seattle, for example, has massive amounts of DHO pollution every year. Here in southern Arizona it is only bad for a month or two out of the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. We are all cooked. Civilization is nearing an end by it's own
undoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
42. Shit, You're Probably Right! More People Probably Even Die More Per Year
from DiHydrogen Oxide then cigarettes. Wonder what those numbers are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
46. I never touch the stuff
fish fornicate in it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. You ever seen a commie drink a glass of DHO?
How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hard-core Commie works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #46
55. ewwww!
wait a minute. alcohol kills germs, right?

I guess I'm ok then. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. I hear what you are saying. I also have to tell you that back in the
70's when they switched from regular leaded gas to this NEW unleaded and started putting catalytic converters on cars, I noticed I couldn't stand even near a car that was just idling and not begin to choke. Now, I'm not saying it was GREAT to inhale exhaust from the old cars, but there was a definite difference!

How many of you have ever waited at a popular bus stop on the way home from work and wanted to gag when the old bus pulled away? I HAVE!

How about driving down the road following a truck that was belching black smoke of a poor running diesel? Ever shut your windows, even on a beautiful spring day????

I don't know what causes the most cancer. I don't think anyone does. But exhaust sure isn't a help!

Is it worse than smoking? I don't know. There sure are more vehicles than there are smokers, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Actually, there's good circumstantial evidence to link auto exhaust
and childhood asthma.

In this country, asthma is most common among children who live along busy highways and rare in rural areas.

It jumps sharply in Third World countries as more people acquire cars. It's soaring in China and India right now.

It's common in Western Europe and uncommon in Eastern Europe.

Some say that exposure to animals confers immunity, but city children in the Third World aren't necessarily exposed to animals.

Some say that excessive cleanliness causes asthma, but no one ever accused China and India of excessive cleanliness.

Some say that rising asthma rates in the Third World are a matter of better diagnosis, but there's been no change in the training given to doctors.

Some say that air pollution per se causes asthma, but Eastern Europe has notoriously bad pollution.

What it didn't have until recently was a lot of cars.

And I'm speaking as one who had no allergy problems until my family moved from a quiet residential street to the side of a state highway when I was in elementary school.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Intreating. Sad that few ever hear about studies like that.
I honestly wonder what the American people would do if they found out that many of the health problems they were having were traced back to the car? Obviously they wouldn't give up their car!

I'd really love to know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Big difference between air pollution leading to asthma
which is undoubtedly true (though I'd suggest that the unregulated industry factories in places like China may have just as much of an impact than car pollution) and suggesting that car exhaust is the leading cause of lung cancer. I suppose big tobacco would probably like it, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Oh, I wasn't agreeing with the OP at all
n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. heh...ok
your point is well taken, as a note. i used to work at a hospital in washington heights in NYC and the levels of asthma there were just ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Come on, I usually love your posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. Jesus, does nicotine kill the logic centers of the brain?
Posting idiotic arguments in favor of your nasty habit isn't going to make anybody suddenly realize that smoking is neither disgusting nor carcinogenic. Give it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Its amazing, but some people are really Republican on some issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
37. Jesus Christ, is this gonna be more of that
"I'm better than you cause I don't drive" bullshit I always see on this forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. I drive like a sonnofabitch...
your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. so you really double down on those carcinogens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
40. Cars Kill
3. Cars kill people
During the twentieth century, 250 million Americans were maimed or injured in automobile accidents. Every single day in the U.S., an average of 121 people are killed in car accidents. The leading cause of death for children aged 5 to 14 in New York City is pedestrian automobile accidents.

4. Cars kill animals
Automobiles, SUVs, trucks, and other fossil field-burning vehicles kill a million wild animals per week in the U.S.-not counting tens of thousands of family pets.

5. Sprawling for dollars
During the last century, an area equal to all the arable land in Ohio, Indiana, and Pennsylvania was paved in the U.S. This area requires maintenance costing over $200 million a day. (The surreptitious cost of the car culture totals nearly $464 billion a year in the U.S. alone, much of that going to the sustentation of a military presence in the Persian Gulf.)

6. Getting warmer?
Automobiles emit one-quarter of U.S. greenhouse gases.

7. Oil in our veins
The U.S. spends $60 billion per year on foreign oil. Eight million barrels of oil per day is combusted in U.S. cars. That’s 450 gallons per person per year.

8. They’re all wasted
Cars create 7 billion pounds of un-recycled scrap and waste annually.

http://www.selvesandothers.org/article15214.html

So do cigs. Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
48. The life insurance industry doubles your premiums if you smoke.
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 11:55 PM by Swede
They don't care if you live in LA or Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Because they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
53. 100% of all people who die are born.
Big whoop.

There is no denying cigarette smoke increases lung cancer. This is on the same level as Holocaust deniers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. People die...
Edited on Sat Sep-23-06 12:10 AM by Tom Yossarian Joad
Equating this to the holocaust is stupid. Me: in my 50's. Grandpa (that is dead) in his 90's.

It's genetics, Some people are so fucking weak that they are an invitation to cancers.

Darwin, Mother******!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. And 100% of all people who are born die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stardust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
60. You need a nap, TYJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. Awww, not yet, my freind!
The dirt ain't calling yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
65. you're not trying to deny smoking causes cancer, are you?
Edited on Sat Sep-23-06 05:53 AM by wyldwolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. I would never "rry" that!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. oh, a spelling nazi.
A pointless post and a spelling lesson from you - all in one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. technically, that would make him a typo nazi, not a spelling nazi
unless you actually THOUGHT "rry" was correct.

and this post would make me a nazi of some sort as well....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #67
69. LOL... I bow to your superior posting acumenn...
Damn, you got me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
70. what about the years before the automobile were invented? People have die
died of cancer since forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. That's true, you *****, but we need villians! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
72. A doctor once told me that nobody who gets lung cancer
has not smoked or lived in a home with a smoker, except in very rare situations, like living in a home with very high radon levels, but it's often the case that they have both radon and cigarette exposure.

And, clearly, a lot of people exposed to car exhaust do not get lung cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #72
76. Quit the logic -- wtf is wrong with you???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #72
77. Okay... Now I have told you that people wha have looked at daisies
have gotten high blood pressure.

Happy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #72
90. 'A doctor told you once'...
Edited on Sat Sep-23-06 03:59 PM by Spider Jerusalem
that's nice. However, there's quite a bit of research that indicates that automobile exhaust, diesel exhaust, factory emissions and pollution from coal-fired power plants are significant contributing factors to lung cancer (and emphysema and childhood asthma, too). It might help to know a little more about what you're talking about than just 'some guy told me once'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
78. Still bragging about your stupidity I see
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
80. There is a link between the athsma increase...
and parents/grandparents smoking, maybe that's because of smog as well, but
i'm dubious, the smoking theory seems likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
82. 100% of lung cancer victims were exposed to water
logic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
83. Both my parents died from smoking....
and had torturous quality of life in their last years. I resent you for making a joke of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #83
84. I'm not making a joke out of it.
And I resent your insinuating that.

I have had people in my family die of environmental issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #84
85. You are being flip, sarcastic, and dismissive.
There are volumes of scientific studies proving the direct corrolation between smoking and several diseases. You act like a repuglican, denying good science. Do you believe in ID too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
86. It takes nothing
but a silly statement for tightly wound people to explode their own heads. Everything is so gd serious now a days that no joke will be taken that way until the holy crap has been beaten out of you. Geez louise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
88. 100% who never contracted lung cancer were exposed to automobile exhaust
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
89. That sounds like something Philip Morrs would bring up
Edited on Sat Sep-23-06 03:57 PM by Jack Rabbit
Of course, Lee Raymond at Exxon used the some reasoning making arguments about global warming for many years.

ON EDIT

Please click here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. Please click HERE:
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/centers/2002News/news6.htm

After factoring in such known risk factors as cigarette smoking, bad diet, obesity, and occupational exposure to toxins, researchers found that air pollution significantly increased risk of death from lung cancer and heart disease.

"The increased risk of lung cancer and heart disease from air pollution was clearly far less than the risks associated with active cigarette smoking," says Pope. "However, we found that the risk of dying from lung cancer as well as heart disease in the most polluted cities was comparable to the risk associated with nonsmokers being exposed to second-hand smoke over a long period of time."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. I lived in LA in the late sixties
Tell me about it.

Forest Lawn Cemetary had a grotesque (in its brighter meaning) series of radio ads in those days; the one I remember was a woman talking about how breathing LA air was like smoking two packs of cigarettes a day. "That means my husband smokes three packs a day."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
93. News flash:
Studies show that 100% of people who eat bread will later die. Bread kills! Also, historians have confirmed that Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin all consumed bread throughout their lives. It's highly likely that bread is the root of all evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC