Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Jesus Camp Banner on the DU Home Page appropriate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:39 AM
Original message
Is the Jesus Camp Banner on the DU Home Page appropriate?
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 07:52 AM by Perky
This is not a defense of the Movie or the Fundy right. I certainly am not suggesting the movie is anthing other than as described. I start with the assumnption that it is accurate in what it says. I DO NOT IN ANYWAY THINK THAT THIS IS "PERSECUTION".

Having said that and given the notable back and forth between Christians DUers and those who don't like or perhaps trust Christians, all I am asking is whether or not the admins have stepped over the some sort of line here.

I don't diagree with the admins view but I am somehow offended that they would banner this movie themselves rather than let it play out on the board while staying above the fray in more of a neutral stance.

Thoughts? And lets keep this civil?

edit for typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. If you research it, it is not a 'fundie' flick.
Quite the opposite, actually. So yeah it's appropriate, IMO.


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I never said it was
I recogonize it is an expose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. This flick is not complimentary
which you'd know if you'd watched the trailer.

I can see why a lot of people would find the banner offensive. Fanatacism and training children in hatred and violence are usually offensive.

However, I found the neon floozie on an MSRNC sex expose ad last summer more offensive.

That's the problem with censorship. We're all offended by different things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Jesus Camp Movie Trailers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. The as does not bother me. In fact, I am glad that someone is
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 07:56 AM by GreenPartyVoter
revealing the dark things that go on in the name of Christ, such as spiritual abuse and brainwashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I guess my question is
whether or not the admins should be doing this or the community should be doing this in the forums Note that I am not certain why I am offended. It may just be that it amps up the infighting here on DU and its not the proper role for the admins to throw oil on the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. All the ads get ppl wound up, but we know the ads are a necessary thing
to keep DU afloat.

I am sure I would be ticked if a "Greens are really Repukes" ad turned up, but I know why the ads are there so I would just suck it up rather than start a flamefest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. nevermind
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 08:20 AM by blogslut
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peteatomic Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is fundamentalism able to co-exist with democratic society?
I don't believe so, imho. The prescription of strict religious law is anti-democratic because it is based on the acceptance of that law by a community of believers who explicitly advocate conversion of non-believers-- and in that atmosphere a pluralistic society ceases to exist. The fundamentalist movement in the US is struggling for a fundamentalist society.

Note that I didn't write that the fundamentalist movement is struggling for a Christian society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. A bit off topic and a bit of an overreach inho
There is a differernce bewteen Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism and Dominionism.

The fundies want the world to follow the dictates set out in scripture and they seek to push that doctrine into the public square through political work or policy.
But evangelicals believe that we can not ask the world to do do anything if they are not in our community already and even then you get into many many different shades of grey.

THe DOminionist think they have the God given right to simply take over.

In essence, the fundies and the dommionist to a greater degree have seased to care about conversion at all. Nvermind aout Jesus. JUst follow our rules and we will all be better off for it. It is truly very scary for the evangelcial community
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peteatomic Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. Sure, there are political struggles within the religious fundie..
conservative movement, and certainly, there are fundie types who are outside their subgroup and actually leftist or left-leaning (maybe few, I don't know), however many of these people have very similar end goals, whether they are fundie/evangelical,etc..for example, it is very difficult to make a political slice off someone like Pat Robertson, who is on one hand very literal in his understanding of the Canon, and somehow seperate that from his worldwide proslytization (sic) efforts.

The common thread to these types are their fundamentalism, with the idea of evangelizing a means to an end of spreading fundamentalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think the admin have put it there themselves
Because I don't see it at all - I suspect it's just another of the advertisements. Or perhaps it has only just disappeared - I don't normally go to the front page, but I don't see it there now. If it was just another of the advertisements, then different people (eg me, in the UK) get different ads, and it's not up to Skinner et al.

I have had Karl Rove's ugly mug appearing on DU pages with ads for the past week, and from a purely aesthetic point of view, I hate that ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Fair point. If it is just advertising I am ok with it
It is now gone. But it was a very large ad in the middle of the page. not one of the small ones on the left. I am bookedmarked to the G-d page not the home page so I do not go there all that often.... it was large centered and very prominent. I amy well have made an incorrect assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's a movie that should be of interest to our members...
...including our Christian members. Which is why they have chosen to advertise the movie here.

I don't think we have any DUers that would fit the "Jesus Camp" mold. Having watched the trailers and read reviews, I'm feeling quite confident that even DUers of faith would be alarmed by the extremists in this movie.

I guess I don't really get any of the controversy here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Thanks for the clarifcation skinner , Irwas in fact an advert. (edits)
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 08:26 AM by Perky
I thought incorrectly that it was something that the admins had put together. My mistake.

you can kill this thread if you wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I'm going to leave the thread open for now.
Because a number of people still seem confused about the ad.

To be clear, I'm not picking on you. But I am genuinely perplexed by the fact that there is *any* controversy about the ad (other than the fact that it shows up a lot).

In case anyone hasn't figured it out yet, this isn't a film that glorifies the Religious Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I don't care for tne name of the movie
MOstly because Fundamentalism shockingly has less and less to do with Jesus and more and more to do with the imposition of Old Testament Moral standards on a pluralistic society. It infers that Jesus was as miliant as these pharasaical zealots are and it disparages Jesus.

Other than that....let her rip...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Gee the radical religious right is organizing an army
of brainwashed idiots to kill us. But we best be polite and not mention it so as not to offend the religiously sensitive. OK. See you in the camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Now that would be flame bait. haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. There are a lot of ads here for things that I have no interest in but
that is just the nature of advertising.

"Republican ringtones"?! -- at least the Jesus Camp thing is somewhat accurately targeted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. yes, I think this should be there for informational purposes
this movie is about the politization of religion...and shows quite clearly what some of these people might desire to do if they are able to break down separation of church and state. I am a Christian (and probably a 'fundie' by the standards of many here...except I swear like a sailor) and this scares me...badly.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holboz Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. Now now! Let's not be what we dispise...!
We often critize the other side for attacking and be critical of things they haven't fully researched themselves.

The attacks on the Jesus Camp movie here at DU stem from not fully researching the movie.

I haven't seen it but the clips that I have seen on the website appear to shine a light on a movement that is disturbing and nothing short of brainwashing. It looks like these adults are turning these kids into Chrstian-fascists who are willing to "lay down their life for the Gospel".

It looks like this is a very enlightening movie and needs to be shown as this is what the Republican party has wrought!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC