Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Email this NY TIMES editorial to Congress.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:32 AM
Original message
Email this NY TIMES editorial to Congress.
My email to both my Senators and my Rep:


Please oppose creating kangaroo courts in Cuba.

We should continue to try terrorists in the real federal courts we have in the US.

Please oppose letting Bush choose secret acts of cruelty to use against prisoners.

It will result in false confessions.

I agree with this NY TIMES editorial.

================================================
A Bad Bargain

Published: September 22, 2006

Here is a way to measure how seriously President Bush was willing to compromise on the military tribunals bill: Less than an hour after an agreement was announced yesterday with three leading Republican senators, the White House was already laying a path to wiggle out of its one real concession.

About the only thing that Senators John Warner, John McCain and Lindsey Graham had to show for their defiance was Mr. Bush’s agreement to drop his insistence on allowing prosecutors of suspected terrorists to introduce classified evidence kept secret from the defendant. The White House agreed to abide by the rules of courts-martial, which bar secret evidence. (Although the administration’s supporters continually claim this means giving classified information to terrorists, the rules actually provide for reviewing, editing and summarizing classified material. Evidence that cannot be safely declassified cannot be introduced.)

...On other issues, the three rebel senators achieved only modest improvements on the White House’s original positions. They wanted to bar evidence obtained through coercion. Now, they have agreed to allow it if a judge finds it reliable (which coerced evidence hardly can be) and relevant to guilt or innocence. The way coercion is measured in the bill, even those protections would not apply to the prisoners at Guantánamo Bay.
================================================


I emailed them the entire editorial, which continues at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/opinion/22fri1.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm trying to think of
what depravity these rightards won't march in lockstep to. But I know I won't have to wait very long to find out. They sink to new lows as regularly as the tides ebb and flow. They're beyond disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We've seen in the past 24 hours how the Republican Senators...
...who were presented as principled caved to Bush, and are allowing bogus trials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. kicking for human rights (NT)
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC