"Hugo and Mahmoud make the Dems look bad"

[UTUSN]

The local radio wingnut talkshow host (a 29%er) is interviewing a wingnut professor and just said, "It's just luck, but just when it looked like the Dems were going to take the House, these two nutcases, Hugo and Mahmoud, come to the U.N. and lash out against (Shrub) and it makes the Dems look bad even if they didn't have anything to do with it."

The prof says, "CHAVEZ, like a clown, a buffoon, while (the Iran dude) is much more sinister, more calculating with his words..."


PLEASE: No "why-do-you-listen-to-this-crap" posts, PLEASE. Thank you.

[ClassWarrior]

1. Why do you listen to...

...oh you know the rest.

NGU.

[Parche]

10. Bryan Kennedy

GO BRYAN KENNEDY WE NEED TO DEFEAT SENSENBRENNER

And after I saw him on C-span last night with the judiciary committee, acting like the a$$
that he is, I want to defeat him even more.
He was so rude to Rep Jackson-Lee

[w4rma]

2. Ignore the wingnut propagandists. They are going to say *something*. (nt)

[petronius]

3. I'd say they earned the 'grasping at straws' award for that one...

Especially when you consider that Bush also spoke at the U.N, making Republicans look bad...

(As if Hugo and Mahmoud had anything to do with Dems anyway.)

[UTUSN]

6. Excellent!!! "Shrub speaking makes Repukes look bad"!!!!1 n/t

[eallen]

4. At least he said that those two have nothing to do with us.

I have no doubt that there are plenty of other wingnuts who will try to associate Chavez and Ahmadinejad with Democrats, merely because all are critics of Bush.

[earth mom]

5. The correct statement is: SHRUB MAKES THE U.S. LOOK BAD!

What's more important? Let's get the story straight here. :grr:

[MamaBear]

7. That's the clumsiest talking point yet.

It will only have life within the 29% bracket anyway. Look at it this way: at least they didn't blame Clinton.

Yet ...

[Hong Kong Cavalier]

8. So...what?

You agree with them?

:shrug:

Two leaders from foreign countries address the U.N., criticize Bush, and somehow that makes a political party
which has practically nothing to do with either of them "look bad".
That's Chaos Theory at its finest.

Howzat again?

:shrug:

[UTUSN]

14. Why would you take the leap, "You agree with them?"

You're not impugning a fellow DUer, are you?

[Hong Kong Cavalier]

16. 'cause you posted it without any commentary at all.

And I was just curious.

:shrug:

Not that much of a leap.

[William769]

9. They don't make the Dem's look bad

It's the Dem's that praise them that look bad.

[geek tragedy]

13. Fortunately, no Democrats of any significance

profess admiration for those guys.

[xchrom]

11. i just stopped by on my way to get some popcorn...

:popcorn:

[alfredo]

12. bush's actions created both. Would Mahmoud be president if bush

hadn't scared the people into the arms of the right wing nationalistics? Would Chavez be as popular as he is if it wasn't for bush?

Iran was slowly moderating. The Imans were losing control of society. Young people were gaining influence. bush changed all that. Nationalism is a natural response to outside threats. Would Chavez have won if American corporate interests hadn't abused the people of Venezuela?

[liberalmuse]

15. So the people who think Bush is a righteous man of God...

Are the same who think Hugo Chavez is a clown. Repubs really do turn things upside down, don't they? I can't help but admire Chavez every time he speaks the harsh truth about the Bush administration.

[hashibabba]

17. Here, here, if Americans aren't going to do it...

someone has to point out that the emperor has no clothes.

[mmonk]

18. G.W. makes the republicans look bad.

[oc2002]

19. Bush makes America look bad...real bad...

nt.,