Is it possible to Impeach a "Unitary Executive"?

[Bandit]

A President yes of course but a "Unitary Executive" by definition is the sole power. :shrug:

[Warpy]

1. No, once the checks and balances

of a constitutional government are no longer in place, he can't be impeached.

He can only be violently overthrown.

Stupid needs to think about that one. So do all his enablers.

[ThomWV]

2. There Is No Such Thing As A "Unitary Executive"

It is just a pharse made up to serve an illegal purpose. The Constitution speaks to the 'Executive", and makes no reference to Bush's version of the power's of that office.

[treestar]

3. I am sure that Dubya will opine, and so will Gonzalez

that the unitary executive cannot be changed in midstream while he is protecting us during war by fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here.

[thereismore]

4. Stupid should give himself to law while there is any. Mob rule is a bitch.

[Jack Rabbit]

5. The unitary executive was refuted ages ago

In 1974, when Nixon resigned while facing certain impeachment and removal, to be precise.

[The Deacon]

6. Unresolved Question

The last one resigned when he realized his pension was at risk.

[Danascot]

7. AKA king, dictator, tyrant, despot

Take your pick

[soothsayer]

8. Not only possible, it is ESSENTIAL.